Docetaxel Compared With Observation in Treating Patients Who Have Undergone Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer
An Open Randomized Phase III Trial of Six Cycles of Docetaxel Versus Surveillance After Radical Prostatectomy in High Grade Prostate Cancer Patients With Margin Positive T2 or T3 Tumours
6 other identifiers
interventional
396
5 countries
8
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as docetaxel, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving docetaxel after surgery may kill any tumor cells that remain after surgery. Sometimes, after surgery, the tumor may not need more treatment until it progresses. In this case, observation may be sufficient. It is not yet known whether giving docetaxel after surgery is more effective than observation in treating prostate cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying docetaxel to see how well it works compared with observation in treating patients who have undergone radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 prostate-cancer
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 15, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedAugust 26, 2013
June 1, 2009
7.2 years
September 13, 2006
August 23, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression
Secondary Outcomes (4)
PSA doubling time
Quality of Life
Metastasis-free survival
Overall survival
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (8)
Aarhus Universitetshospital - Aarhus Sygehus
Aarhus, DK 8200, Denmark
Copenhagen County Herlev University Hospital
Copenhagen, DK-2730, Denmark
Tampere University Hospital
Tampere, 33521, Finland
Landspitalinn University Hospital
Reykjavik, 125, Iceland
Ullevaal University Hospital
Oslo, 0407, Norway
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Trondheim, N-7005, Norway
Lund University Hospital
Lund, SE-22185, Sweden
Malmo University Hospital
Malmo, S-20502, Sweden
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Goran Ahlgren, MD, PhD
Skane University Hospital
Per Flodgren, MD, PhD
Lund University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2006
First Posted
September 15, 2006
Study Start
October 1, 2005
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
August 26, 2013
Record last verified: 2009-06