Ahmed Versus Baerveldt Comparison Study
ABC
2 other identifiers
interventional
276
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to compare the long-term safety and efficacy of the Ahmed and the Baerveldt implants in patients who are undergoing aqueous shunt implant surgery for glaucoma. One eye of eligible patients will be randomized. Outcome measures include intraocular pressure, visual acuity, visual field, number of glaucoma medications, glaucoma reoperations, and complications, including suprachoroidal hemorrhage, endophthalmitis, choroidal effusion, diplopia, corneal edema, and shunt/tube erosion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2005
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 14, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 4, 2015
CompletedAugust 20, 2015
July 1, 2015
8.1 years
September 13, 2006
May 17, 2015
July 25, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Intraocular Pressure
intraocular pressure mmHg at 5 years
5 years
Failure Rate
5-year failure rate measured by Kaplan-Meier, defined as IOP\>21 mm Hg or less than a 20% reduction below baseline on 2 consecutive study visits after 3 months, reoperation for glaucoma, loss of light perception, or removal of implant
5 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Visual Acuity
5 years
Study Arms (2)
Ahmed implant,1
ACTIVE COMPARATORAhmed glaucoma drainage implant for intraocular pressure control
Baerveldt implant
ACTIVE COMPARATORBaerveldt glaucoma drainage implant for intraocular pressure control
Interventions
placement of glaucoma drainage device to control intraocular pressure
placement of glaucoma drainage device to control intraocular press
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 to 85 years, inclusive.
- Glaucoma that is inadequately controlled on tolerated medical therapy with intraocular pressure greater than or equal to 18 mm Hg.
- Glaucoma drainage implant as planned surgical procedure.
- POAG with previous failed trabeculectomy or other intraocular surgery.
- Secondary glaucoma with or without previous intraocular surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Unwilling or unable to give consent or unwilling to accept randomization.
- Patient out of area and potentially unavailable for follow-up visits
- No light perception.
- Uveitis secondary to Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
- Previous cyclodestructive procedure or previous aqueous shunt device implanted in the same eye.
- Supero-temporal buckling or other external impediment to supero-temporal aqueous shunt implantation.
- Silicone oil-filled eyes or sufficient residual intraocular silicone oil to preclude supero-temporal aqueous shunt implantation.
- Vitreous sufficient to require a vitrectomy present in the anterior chamber at the time of surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Miamilead
- National Eye Institute (NEI)collaborator
- Research to Prevent Blindnesscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Miami, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute
Miami, Florida, 33136, United States
Related Publications (11)
Coleman AL, Hill R, Wilson MR, Choplin N, Kotas-Neumann R, Tam M, Bacharach J, Panek WC. Initial clinical experience with the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995 Jul;120(1):23-31. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)73755-9.
PMID: 7611326BACKGROUNDTopouzis F, Coleman AL, Choplin N, Bethlem MM, Hill R, Yu F, Panek WC, Wilson MR. Follow-up of the original cohort with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999 Aug;128(2):198-204. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00080-x.
PMID: 10458176BACKGROUNDLloyd MA, Baerveldt G, Fellenbaum PS, Sidoti PA, Minckler DS, Martone JF, LaBree L, Heuer DK. Intermediate-term results of a randomized clinical trial of the 350- versus the 500-mm2 Baerveldt implant. Ophthalmology. 1994 Aug;101(8):1456-63; discussion 1463-4. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31152-3.
PMID: 8058290BACKGROUNDBritt MT, LaBree LD, Lloyd MA, Minckler DS, Heuer DK, Baerveldt G, Varma R. Randomized clinical trial of the 350-mm2 versus the 500-mm2 Baerveldt implant: longer term results: is bigger better? Ophthalmology. 1999 Dec;106(12):2312-8. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90532-8.
PMID: 10599663BACKGROUNDWang JC, See JL, Chew PT. Experience with the use of Baerveldt and Ahmed glaucoma drainage implants in an Asian population. Ophthalmology. 2004 Jul;111(7):1383-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.11.005.
PMID: 15234141BACKGROUNDTsai JC, Johnson CC, Dietrich MS. The Ahmed shunt versus the Baerveldt shunt for refractory glaucoma: a single-surgeon comparison of outcome. Ophthalmology. 2003 Sep;110(9):1814-21. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00574-8.
PMID: 13129882BACKGROUNDNguyen QH, Budenz DL, Parrish RK 2nd. Complications of Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implants. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998 May;116(5):571-5. doi: 10.1001/archopht.116.5.571.
PMID: 9596491BACKGROUNDBarton K, Gedde SJ, Budenz DL, Feuer WJ, Schiffman J; Ahmed Baerveldt Comparison Study Group. The Ahmed Baerveldt Comparison Study methodology, baseline patient characteristics, and intraoperative complications. Ophthalmology. 2011 Mar;118(3):435-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.07.015. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
PMID: 20932581RESULTBudenz DL, Barton K, Feuer WJ, Schiffman J, Costa VP, Godfrey DG, Buys YM; Ahmed Baerveldt Comparison Study Group. Treatment outcomes in the Ahmed Baerveldt Comparison Study after 1 year of follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2011 Mar;118(3):443-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.07.016. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
PMID: 20932583RESULTBarton K, Feuer WJ, Budenz DL, Schiffman J, Costa VP, Godfrey DG, Buys YM; Ahmed Baerveldt Comparison Study Group. Three-year treatment outcomes in the Ahmed Baerveldt comparison study. Ophthalmology. 2014 Aug;121(8):1547-57.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.01.036. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
PMID: 24768240RESULTBudenz DL, Barton K, Gedde SJ, Feuer WJ, Schiffman J, Costa VP, Godfrey DG, Buys YM; Ahmed Baerveldt Comparison Study Group. Five-year treatment outcomes in the Ahmed Baerveldt comparison study. Ophthalmology. 2015 Feb;122(2):308-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.043. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
PMID: 25439606RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Donald Budenz
- Organization
- University of North Carolina
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Donald L Budenz, M.D.,M.P.H.
University of North Carolina
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Keith Barton, M.D.
Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
William J Feuer, M.S.
University of Miami
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Study Chairman
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2006
First Posted
September 14, 2006
Study Start
November 1, 2005
Primary Completion
December 1, 2013
Study Completion
October 1, 2014
Last Updated
August 20, 2015
Results First Posted
June 4, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-07