Ontario Multidetector Computed Tomographic (MDCT) Coronary Angiography Study (OMCAS)
The Ontario Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) Coronary Angiography Study (OMCAS)
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
168
1 country
4
Study Start
September 2006
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
June 2009
Actual (reported)Study Completion
June 2009
Actual (reported)Multidetector Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography (MDCTCA) has been recently demonstrated to be accurate and may be used as a potential alternative to conventional invasive coronary angiography, which requires cardiac catheterization, for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. The purpose of this study is to see if MDCTCA can identify significant coronary artery disease as good as or better than conventional coronary angiography (CICA). The study is designed to enroll 900 subjects and is being conducted in 6 hospitals in Ontario. Subjects scheduled for conventional cardiac catheterization and coronary angiography will receive an additional test using MDCTCA. The information gathered during the MDCTCA will be compared to the results of the scheduled conventional invasive coronary angiogram.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
June 2009
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
September 2006
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
September 1, 2006
Actual (reported)September 4, 2006
Actual (reported)June 2009
Actual (reported)June 2009
Actual (reported)Sensitivity and specificity of MDCTCA as compared to CICA
After both MDCTCA and CICA are completed
Descriptive statistics (rates and proportions) will be calculated for the number of "avoidable" diagnostic cardiac catheterizations.
After both MDCTCA and CICA are completed
The accuracy of MDCTCA to CICA will be compared in categorizing patients inot single, double, triple vessel, left main disease or no coronary stenosis.
After both MDCTCA and CICA are completed
The accuracy of MDCTCA to eliminate correctly the need for CICA will be calculated.
After both MDCTCA and CICA are completed
1 Multidetector Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
University of Ottawa Heart Institute
Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4W7, Canada
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada
University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada
Chow BJ, Freeman MR, Bowen JM, Levin L, Hopkins RB, Provost Y, Tarride JE, Dennie C, Cohen EA, Marcuzzi D, Iwanochko R, Moody AR, Paul N, Parker JD, O'Reilly DJ, Xie F, Goeree R. Ontario multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography study: field evaluation of diagnostic accuracy. Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jun 13;171(11):1021-9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.74. Epub 2011 Mar 14.
Michael Freeman, MD
Unity Health Toronto
Alan Moody, MD
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Benjamin Chow, MD
Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation
Ronald Goeree, MA
Program for Assessment of Technology in Health, St. Joseph's Healthcare/McMaster University
168 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
September 1, 2006
First Posted
September 4, 2006
Study Start
September 2006
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Improved Diagnosis of Congenital Heart Disease by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Vasovist
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Narinder Paul, MD
University Health Network, Toronto
Primary Completion
June 2009
Actual (reported)Study Completion
June 2009
Actual (reported)Last Updated
November 25, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-11
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: