NCT00368849

Brief Summary

The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the effect of atomoxetine (also known as Strattera) compared to placebo (inactive substance) on daily activities such as attention and focus, thinking ability and muscle movements in subjects with early Huntington Disease (HD) and attention deficit disorder (ADD).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2005

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2005

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 24, 2006

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 29, 2006

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2008

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2008

Completed
4.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 27, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

December 20, 2012

Status Verified

December 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

August 24, 2006

Results QC Date

May 9, 2011

Last Update Submit

December 18, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

Huntington DiseaseChoreaAttentionADHDADDStratteraAtomoxetine

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Conners' Adult Attention Rating Scale (CAARS)

    The Conners' Adult Attention Rating Scale (CAARS) is one of the most frequently used self-rating measures for adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and was given as a self-report measure of attention. It has 66 items with each item ranging from 0 to 3 points. Higher total scores represent greater impairment. The outcome reported was change in score from baseline for each treatment arm.

    There are two time points for this measure: baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment

  • Attention Composite Score

    The attention composite comprises performance on Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale III Symbol-Digit and Letter Number Sequencing Subtests, Trail Making Test Part A, computerized simple-choice reaction time, and computerized working memory (i.e., 2-Back). The composite score is the average combined z score for each test. Higher, positive values indicate better than average performance and negative and lower values indicate worse than average. The outcome reported was change in score from baseline for each treatment arm.

    There are two time points for this measure: baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment

  • Executive Composite Score

    The executive composite comprises performance on Trail Making Test Part B, Stroop Color and Word Test, and the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (i.e., Verbal Fluency). The composite score is the average combined z score for each test. Positive values indicate better than average performance and negative values worse than average. The outcome reported was change in score from baseline for each treatment arm.

    There are two time points for this measure: baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R)

    There are two time points for this measure: baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment

  • Unified Huntington Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) Total Motor Score

    There are two time points for this measure: baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment

Study Arms (2)

40 milligram twice a day atomoxetine

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received 40 milligram twice a day atomoxetine for 4 weeks.

Drug: atomoxetine

Twice a day matching placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants received twice a day matching placebo for 4 weeks.

Drug: Matching Placebo

Interventions

This study utilizes a crossover design. Accordingly, half of the participants receive 40 milligram twice a day atomoxetine at arm one while the remaining half receive this intervention at arm two.

Also known as: Strattera
40 milligram twice a day atomoxetine

This study utilizes a crossover design. Accordingly, half of the participants receive twice a day matching placebo at arm one while the remaining half receive this intervention at arm two.

Also known as: Sugar pill
Twice a day matching placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Confirmed Huntington's disease (HD) diagnosis
  • Age 18 to 65
  • Must have mild HD
  • Must have complaints of poor attention

You may not qualify if:

  • Childhood history of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms
  • Diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder, dementia, delirium or severe anxiety
  • Current use of a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) medication
  • Pregnancy
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Tachycardia
  • Cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease
  • History of a loss of consciousness for greater than (or equal to) 5 minutes
  • Having any neurological disorder or insult other than Huntington disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The University of Iowa

Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States

Location

Related Publications (16)

  • A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington's disease chromosomes. The Huntington's Disease Collaborative Research Group. Cell. 1993 Mar 26;72(6):971-83. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90585-e.

    PMID: 8458085BACKGROUND
  • Campodonico JR, Aylward E, Codori AM, Young C, Krafft L, Magdalinski M, Ranen N, Slavney PR, Brandt J. When does Huntington's disease begin? J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1998 Sep;4(5):467-73. doi: 10.1017/s1355617798455061.

    PMID: 9745236BACKGROUND
  • Lawrence AD, Hodges JR, Rosser AE, Kershaw A, ffrench-Constant C, Rubinsztein DC, Robbins TW, Sahakian BJ. Evidence for specific cognitive deficits in preclinical Huntington's disease. Brain. 1998 Jul;121 ( Pt 7):1329-41. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.7.1329.

    PMID: 9679784BACKGROUND
  • Paulsen JS, Zhao H, Stout JC, Brinkman RR, Guttman M, Ross CA, Como P, Manning C, Hayden MR, Shoulson I; Huntington Study Group. Clinical markers of early disease in persons near onset of Huntington's disease. Neurology. 2001 Aug 28;57(4):658-62. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.4.658.

    PMID: 11524475BACKGROUND
  • Marder K, Zhao H, Myers RH, Cudkowicz M, Kayson E, Kieburtz K, Orme C, Paulsen J, Penney JB Jr, Siemers E, Shoulson I. Rate of functional decline in Huntington's disease. Huntington Study Group. Neurology. 2000 Jan 25;54(2):452-8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.54.2.452.

    PMID: 10668713BACKGROUND
  • Gomez-Tortosa E, MacDonald ME, Friend JC, Taylor SA, Weiler LJ, Cupples LA, Srinidhi J, Gusella JF, Bird ED, Vonsattel JP, Myers RH. Quantitative neuropathological changes in presymptomatic Huntington's disease. Ann Neurol. 2001 Jan;49(1):29-34.

    PMID: 11198293BACKGROUND
  • Beglinger, L. et al. The association between speed of processing and cerebral white matter volume in patients with mild Huntington's disease [abstract]. Poster session accepted at the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, April, 2004

    BACKGROUND
  • Halliday GM, McRitchie DA, Macdonald V, Double KL, Trent RJ, McCusker E. Regional specificity of brain atrophy in Huntington's disease. Exp Neurol. 1998 Dec;154(2):663-72. doi: 10.1006/exnr.1998.6919.

    PMID: 9878201BACKGROUND
  • Nopoulos, P. et al., (under review). Structural Brain Abnormalities in pre-symptomatic Huntington's disease.

    BACKGROUND
  • Aylward EH, Anderson NB, Bylsma FW, Wagster MV, Barta PE, Sherr M, Feeney J, Davis A, Rosenblatt A, Pearlson GD, Ross CA. Frontal lobe volume in patients with Huntington's disease. Neurology. 1998 Jan;50(1):252-8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.50.1.252.

    PMID: 9443488BACKGROUND
  • Casey BJ, Castellanos FX, Giedd JN, Marsh WL, Hamburger SD, Schubert AB, Vauss YC, Vaituzis AC, Dickstein DP, Sarfatti SE, Rapoport JL. Implication of right frontostriatal circuitry in response inhibition and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997 Mar;36(3):374-83. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199703000-00016.

    PMID: 9055518BACKGROUND
  • Hale TS, Hariri AR, McCracken JT. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: perspectives from neuroimaging. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2000;6(3):214-9. doi: 10.1002/1098-2779(2000)6:33.0.CO;2-M.

    PMID: 10982499BACKGROUND
  • Heilman KM, Voeller KK, Nadeau SE. A possible pathophysiologic substrate of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Child Neurol. 1991;6 Suppl:S76-81. doi: 10.1177/0883073891006001s09.

    PMID: 2002218BACKGROUND
  • Spencer T, Biederman J, Wilens T, Prince J, Hatch M, Jones J, Harding M, Faraone SV, Seidman L. Effectiveness and tolerability of tomoxetine in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 1998 May;155(5):693-5. doi: 10.1176/ajp.155.5.693.

    PMID: 9585725BACKGROUND
  • Michelson D, Adler L, Spencer T, Reimherr FW, West SA, Allen AJ, Kelsey D, Wernicke J, Dietrich A, Milton D. Atomoxetine in adults with ADHD: two randomized, placebo-controlled studies. Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Jan 15;53(2):112-20. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01671-2.

    PMID: 12547466BACKGROUND
  • Conners, CK et al. Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales (CAARS). 1999. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.

    BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Huntington DiseaseChoreaAttention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity

Interventions

Atomoxetine HydrochlorideSugars

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Basal Ganglia DiseasesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesDementiaDyskinesiasMovement DisordersHeredodegenerative Disorders, Nervous SystemNeurodegenerative DiseasesGenetic Diseases, InbornCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesCognition DisordersNeurocognitive DisordersMental DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsAttention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior DisordersNeurodevelopmental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PropylaminesAminesOrganic ChemicalsCarbohydrates

Limitations and Caveats

We cannot rule out carryover effects. Additionally, the sample size may be too low to detect small treatment changes, the treatment duration may have been too brief, and our participants had only early-stage HD which may have limited the drug effect.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Leigh J. Beglinger, Ph.D.
Organization
The University of Iowa

Study Officials

  • Leigh J Beglinger, Ph.D.

    University of Iowa

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2006

First Posted

August 29, 2006

Study Start

November 1, 2005

Primary Completion

February 1, 2008

Study Completion

February 1, 2008

Last Updated

December 20, 2012

Results First Posted

November 27, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-12

Locations