A Double-Blind, Paralleled Study Comparing Efficacy/Safety of Solifenacin to Tolterodine in Overactive Bladder Patients
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Paralleled, Active Controlled, Multi-Center Study of the Efficacy and Safety of 5mg Solifenacin Succinate Compared to Tolterodine in Patients With Overactive Bladder
1 other identifier
interventional
246
1 country
4
Brief Summary
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of solifenacin succinate (Vesicare) 5mg OD in subjects with overactive bladder compared to tolterodine wmg, bid
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Sep 2006
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 24, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 25, 2006
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2008
CompletedApril 10, 2008
April 1, 2008
1.5 years
August 24, 2006
April 9, 2008
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline in mean number of micturitions per 24 hours
8 Weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change from baseline in mean volume voided per micturition
8 Weeks
Change from baseline in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours
8 Weeks
Change from baseline in mean urgency frequency per 24 hours
8 Weeks
Change from baseline in mean nocturia episodes per 24 hours
8 Weeks
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTAL2
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients willing and able to complete the micturition diary correctly
- Patients experiencing frequency of micturition as verified in the diary
- Patients experiencing significant post void residual volume
- OAB symptoms including urinary frequency, urgency or urge incontinence for 3 months or more.
You may not qualify if:
- Significant post void residual volume
- Patients with indwelling catheters or practicing intermittent self- catheterization
- Known or suspected hypersensitivity to solifenacin succinate or other anticholinergics or lactose
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Unknown Facility
Beijing, 100000, China
Unknown Facility
Chongqing, 404000, China
Unknown Facility
Hangzhou, 310000, China
Unknown Facility
Shanghai, 200000, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Use Central Contact
Peking University First Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 24, 2006
First Posted
August 25, 2006
Study Start
September 1, 2006
Primary Completion
March 1, 2008
Study Completion
March 1, 2008
Last Updated
April 10, 2008
Record last verified: 2008-04