NCT00362791

Brief Summary

The efficacy of counseling to prevent infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) has not been definitively shown. This multi-center randomized controlled trial (Project RESPECT) sought to compare the effects of 2 interactive HIV/STD counseling interventions with didactic prevention messages typical of current practice. A total of 5758 STD clinic patients were enrolled from 5 public STD clinics (Baltimore, Md; Denver, Colo; Long Beach, Calif; Newark, NJ; and San Francisco, Calif) between July 1993 and September 1996. Eligible participants were heterosexual, HIV-negative patients aged 14 years or older who came for full STD examinations. Using a block design, participating men and women were randomzied separately to 1 of 3 individual face-to-face interventions. Arm 1 received "enhanced counseling" consisting of 4 interactive counseling sessions based on the Theory of Reasoned Action and Health Belief Model. Arm 2 received "brief counseling", consisting of 2 interactive risk-reduction sessions based on CDC's client-centered counseling model. Arms 3 and 4 each received 2 brief didactic messages about HIV/STD prevention messages typical of current care at that time. Participants assigned to Arms 1, 2, and 3 were actively followed up after enrollment with questionnaires at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and STD laboratory examinations and tests at 6 and 12 months. An intent-to-treat analysis was used to compare interventions. Arm 4 participants were followed passively to determine potential effects of active study follow-up. The main outcome measures were self-reported condom use and new diagnoses of STDs (gonorrhea, chlamydia, syphilis, HIV) defined by laboratory tests. Results: At the 3- and 6-month follow-up visits, self-reported 100% condom use was higher (P\<.05) in both the enhanced counseling and brief counseling arms compared with participants in the didactic messages arm. Through the 6-month interval, 30% fewer participants had new STDs in both the enhanced counseling (7.2%; P = .002) and brief counseling (7.3%;P=.005) arms compared with those in the didactic messages arm (10.4%). Through the 12-month study, 20% fewer participants in each counseling intervention had new STDs compared with those in the didactic messages arm (P = .008). Consistently at each of the 5 study sites, STD incidence was lower in the counseling intervention arms than in the didactic messages intervention arm. Reduction of STD was similar for men and women and greater for adolescents and persons with an STD diagnosed at enrollment. Subset analyses found that Based on these results, we conclude that short counseling interventions using personalized risk reduction plans can increase condom use and prevent new STDs. Effective counseling can be conducted even in busy public clinics.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
6,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable hiv

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2003

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2003

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2005

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 8, 2006

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 10, 2006

Completed
Last Updated

August 10, 2006

Status Verified

July 1, 2005

First QC Date

August 8, 2006

Last Update Submit

August 9, 2006

Conditions

Keywords

voluntary counseling and testingHIV/STD prevention counselingHIV/STD prevention interventioncounseling efficacy

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age14 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \- patients who came to the STD clinic and who were eligible in routine clinic practice to undergo confidential HIV testing

You may not qualify if:

  • residence outside the clinics' catchment areas
  • had made firm plans (e.g., can give a new address) to move outside the clinic catchment area during the next 12 months
  • unable to provide informed consent to be tested for HIV and take part in the follow up aspect of the study (e.g., incarcerated, mental status changes from drugs, alcohol, medication)
  • reported that he or she had tested positive for HIV in the past
  • did not speak and comprehend English well enough to participate in the interventions
  • came to the clinic for something other than a full routine STD clinic examinations
  • was a man who reported sex with a man in the past 12 months
  • had been approached for study participation on a previous clinic visit, and hd already enrolled or refused participation
  • age \< 14 years.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Interventions

Health Belief Model

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Communicable DiseasesInfectionsGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Models, TheoreticalInvestigative TechniquesModels, Psychological

Study Officials

  • Mary L Kamb, MD, MPH

    US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
FED

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2006

First Posted

August 10, 2006

Study Start

April 1, 2003

Study Completion

July 1, 2005

Last Updated

August 10, 2006

Record last verified: 2005-07