Project RESPECT: The Efficacy of HIV/STD Prevention Counseling
Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of HIV/STD Prevention Counseling and Testing in Preventing High Risk Behaviors and New Sexually Transmitted Diseases (Project RESPECT)
6 other identifiers
interventional
6,000
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The efficacy of counseling to prevent infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) has not been definitively shown. This multi-center randomized controlled trial (Project RESPECT) sought to compare the effects of 2 interactive HIV/STD counseling interventions with didactic prevention messages typical of current practice. A total of 5758 STD clinic patients were enrolled from 5 public STD clinics (Baltimore, Md; Denver, Colo; Long Beach, Calif; Newark, NJ; and San Francisco, Calif) between July 1993 and September 1996. Eligible participants were heterosexual, HIV-negative patients aged 14 years or older who came for full STD examinations. Using a block design, participating men and women were randomzied separately to 1 of 3 individual face-to-face interventions. Arm 1 received "enhanced counseling" consisting of 4 interactive counseling sessions based on the Theory of Reasoned Action and Health Belief Model. Arm 2 received "brief counseling", consisting of 2 interactive risk-reduction sessions based on CDC's client-centered counseling model. Arms 3 and 4 each received 2 brief didactic messages about HIV/STD prevention messages typical of current care at that time. Participants assigned to Arms 1, 2, and 3 were actively followed up after enrollment with questionnaires at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and STD laboratory examinations and tests at 6 and 12 months. An intent-to-treat analysis was used to compare interventions. Arm 4 participants were followed passively to determine potential effects of active study follow-up. The main outcome measures were self-reported condom use and new diagnoses of STDs (gonorrhea, chlamydia, syphilis, HIV) defined by laboratory tests. Results: At the 3- and 6-month follow-up visits, self-reported 100% condom use was higher (P\<.05) in both the enhanced counseling and brief counseling arms compared with participants in the didactic messages arm. Through the 6-month interval, 30% fewer participants had new STDs in both the enhanced counseling (7.2%; P = .002) and brief counseling (7.3%;P=.005) arms compared with those in the didactic messages arm (10.4%). Through the 12-month study, 20% fewer participants in each counseling intervention had new STDs compared with those in the didactic messages arm (P = .008). Consistently at each of the 5 study sites, STD incidence was lower in the counseling intervention arms than in the didactic messages intervention arm. Reduction of STD was similar for men and women and greater for adolescents and persons with an STD diagnosed at enrollment. Subset analyses found that Based on these results, we conclude that short counseling interventions using personalized risk reduction plans can increase condom use and prevent new STDs. Effective counseling can be conducted even in busy public clinics.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable hiv
Started Apr 2003
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2003
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 8, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 10, 2006
CompletedAugust 10, 2006
July 1, 2005
August 8, 2006
August 9, 2006
Conditions
Keywords
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- patients who came to the STD clinic and who were eligible in routine clinic practice to undergo confidential HIV testing
You may not qualify if:
- residence outside the clinics' catchment areas
- had made firm plans (e.g., can give a new address) to move outside the clinic catchment area during the next 12 months
- unable to provide informed consent to be tested for HIV and take part in the follow up aspect of the study (e.g., incarcerated, mental status changes from drugs, alcohol, medication)
- reported that he or she had tested positive for HIV in the past
- did not speak and comprehend English well enough to participate in the interventions
- came to the clinic for something other than a full routine STD clinic examinations
- was a man who reported sex with a man in the past 12 months
- had been approached for study participation on a previous clinic visit, and hd already enrolled or refused participation
- age \< 14 years.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Centers for Disease Control and Preventionlead
- San Francisco Department of Public Healthcollaborator
- City of Long Beach Department of Health and Human Servicescollaborator
- Colorado Department of Public Health and Environmentcollaborator
- Baltimore City Health Departmentcollaborator
- City of Newark Health Departmentcollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mary L Kamb, MD, MPH
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- FED
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 8, 2006
First Posted
August 10, 2006
Study Start
April 1, 2003
Study Completion
July 1, 2005
Last Updated
August 10, 2006
Record last verified: 2005-07