A Study of Safety and Effectiveness of Golimumab in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Methotrexate Therapy
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of Golimumab, a Fully Human Anti-TNFa Monoclonal Antibody, Administered Intravenously, in Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Methotrexate Therapy
3 other identifiers
interventional
643
15 countries
72
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of golimumab intravenous (IV) infusions every 12 weeks with or without Methotrexate (MTX), compared with MTX alone, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite concurrent MTX treatment. In addition, the safety of subcutaneous (SC) golimumab injections following transition from IV golimumab infusions will also be evaluated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 rheumatoid-arthritis
Started Sep 2006
Typical duration for phase_3 rheumatoid-arthritis
72 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 4, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 8, 2006
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 24, 2012
CompletedJuly 29, 2014
July 1, 2014
1.2 years
August 4, 2006
February 24, 2010
July 23, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Week 14
An ACR 50 response is defined as a greater than or equal to 50 percentage improvement from baseline in: 1. Swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) 2. greater than or equal to 50 percentage improvement in 3 of the following 5 assessments: a. Patient's assessment of pain (VAS) (0-10 cm) b. Patient's Global Assessment of Disease activity (VAS) (0-10 cm) c. Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS) (0-10 cm) d. Patient's assessment of physical function as measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) e. C reactive protein (CRP).
Week 0 to Week 14
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Week 24
Week 0 to Week 24
Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 14
Week 0 to Week 14
Number of Participants With a Disease Activity Index Score 28 (Using C-reactive Protein)Moderate or Good Response at Week 14
Week 0 to Week 14
Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) at Week 14
Weeks 0 to Week 14
Study Arms (5)
Group I: 2mg/kg Golimumab + MTX
EXPERIMENTALIntravenous (IV) infusions of 2mg/kg golimumab at Week 0 and every 12 weeks thereafter with early escape (an additional 2mg/kg IV infusion of golimumab) and dose regimen adjustment (switch to 4mg/kg IV golimumab), depending on joint assessment results, at Week 16 and 24, respectively. The duration of the combined IV treatment period (initial treatment plus early escape and/or dose regimen adjustment) will be a minimum of 48 weeks. The IV treatment period will be followed by the option of subcutaneous (SC) injections of 50mg golimumab every 4 weeks for a further 24 weeks (Extension Study). In addition, patients will receive methotrexate (MTX) at the same dose as that before study entry
Group II: 2mg/kg Golimumab only
EXPERIMENTALIV infusions of 2mg/kg golimumab at Week 0 and every 12 weeks thereafter with early escape (addition of MTX) and dose regimen adjustment (addition of MTX or switch to 4mg/kg IV golimumab), depending on joint assessment results, at Week 16 and 24, respectively. The duration of the combined IV treatment period (initial treatment plus early escape and/or dose regimen adjustment) will be a minimum of 48 weeks. The IV treatment period will be followed by the option of SC injections of 50mg golimumab every 4 weeks for a further 24 weeks (Extension Study). In addition, patients will receive placebo (sham MTX) capsules
Group III: 4mg/kg Golimumab + MTX
EXPERIMENTALIV infusions of 4mg/kg golimumab at Week 0 and every 12 weeks thereafter for a minimum of 48 weeks followed by the option of SC injections of 50mg golimumab every 4 weeks for a further 24 weeks (Extension Study). In addition, patients will receive MTX at the same dose as that before study entry.
Group IV: 4mg/kg Golimumab only
EXPERIMENTALIV infusions of 4mg/kg golimumab at Week 0 and every 12 weeks thereafter with early escape (addition of MTX) and dose regimen adjustment (addition of MTX), depending on joint assessment results, at Week 16 and 24, respectively. The duration of the combined IV treatment period (initial treatment plus early escape and/or dose regimen adjustment) will be a minimum of 48 weeks. The IV treatment period will be followed by the option of SC injections of 50mg golimumab every 4 weeks for a further 24 weeks (Extension Study). In addition, patients will receive placebo (sham MTX) capsules.
Group V: IV Placebo + MTX
PLACEBO COMPARATORIV infusions of placebo at Week 0 and Week 12 with early escape (switch to 4mg/kg IV golimumab) and dose regimen adjustment (switch to 4mg/kg IV golimumab), depending on joint assessment results, at Week 16 and 24, respectively. The duration of the combined IV treatment period (placebo plus golimumab) will be a minimum of 48 weeks. The IV treatment period will be followed by the option of SC injections of 50mg golimumab every 4 weeks for a further 24 weeks (Extension Study). In addition patients will receive MTX at the same dose as that before study entry. Participants still receiving placebo injections at Week 48 are not eligible to enter the Extension Study.
Interventions
2mg/kg or 4mg/kg will be administered as an IV infusion over 30 minutes
Active MTX capsules, filled with microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel PH 102) and a 2.5 mg MTX tablet, will be administered at the same dose as before the study entry.
Placebo solution will be administered through IV infusion in Group V and oral placebo capsules (sham MTX) filled with microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel PH 102) will be administered in Group II and IV.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Must have a diagnosis of active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (according to the revised 1987 criteria of the ARA (American Rheumatism Association) with at least 4 swollen and 4 tender joints for at least 3 months prior to screening - Have been treated with and tolerated methotrexate (MTX) at a dose of at least 15 mg per week for at least 3 months prior to screening - Have been on a stable MTX dose of greater than or equal to 15 mg per week and less than or eual to 25 mg per week for at least 4 weeks prior to screening - If using non steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (such as naproxen) or other pain relievers for RA, must be on a stable dose for at least 2 weeks prior to the first administration of study agent
You may not qualify if:
- \- Participants having known hypersensitivity (severe allergy) to human immunoglobulin proteins or other components of golimumab - Having known clinically serious adverse reaction to a biologic anti-TNF agent - Have had history of latent or active granulomatous infection, including tuberculosis, histoplasmosis, or coccidioidomycosis, prior to screening
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Centocor, Inc.lead
- Schering-Ploughcollaborator
Study Sites (72)
Unknown Facility
Peoria, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Aventura, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Orlando, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Tampa, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
Unknown Facility
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Unknown Facility
Voorhees Township, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Albany, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Roslyn, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Norristown, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
West Reading, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Amarillo, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Fort Worth, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Lubbock, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Spokane, Washington, United States
Unknown Facility
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Córdoba, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Rosario, Argentina
Unknown Facility
San Juan, Argentina
Unknown Facility
San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Santa Fe, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Fitzroy, Australia
Unknown Facility
Heidelberg, Australia
Unknown Facility
Maroochydore, Australia
Unknown Facility
Melbourne, Australia
Unknown Facility
Perth, Australia
Unknown Facility
Woodville, Australia
Unknown Facility
Barranquilla, Colombia
Unknown Facility
Bogotá, Colombia
Unknown Facility
Bucaramanga, Colombia
Unknown Facility
Floridablanca, Colombia
Unknown Facility
Erlangen, Germany
Unknown Facility
Hamburg, Germany
Unknown Facility
Magdeburg, Germany
Unknown Facility
München, Germany
Unknown Facility
Budapest, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Szolnok, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Daugavpils, Latvia
Unknown Facility
Riga, Latvia
Unknown Facility
Kaunas, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Klaipėda, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Šiauliai, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Vilnius, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Ipoh, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Kuching, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Precinct 7, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Selangor Darul Ehasan, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Msd06 Gwardiamangia, Malta
Unknown Facility
Colonia del Valle, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Guadalajara, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Guadalajara Jalisco, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Monterrey, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Christchurch, New Zealand
Unknown Facility
Dunedin, New Zealand
Unknown Facility
Rotorua, New Zealand
Unknown Facility
Takapuna Auckland, New Zealand
Unknown Facility
Timaru, New Zealand
Unknown Facility
Lima, Peru
Unknown Facility
Bialystok, Poland
Unknown Facility
Elblag, Poland
Unknown Facility
Krakow, Poland
Unknown Facility
Warsaw, Poland
Unknown Facility
Włoszczowa, Poland
Unknown Facility
Kiev, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Kyiv, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Symferpol, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Zhaporizhzhya, Ukraine
Related Publications (5)
George MD, Ostergaard M, Conaghan PG, Emery P, Baker DG, Baker JF. Obesity and rates of clinical remission and low MRI inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Oct;76(10):1743-1746. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211569. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
PMID: 28606966DERIVEDBaker JF, Conaghan PG, Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Shults J, Emery P, Baker DG, Ostergaard M. Development and validation of modified disease activity scores in rheumatoid arthritis: superior correlation with magnetic resonance imaging-detected synovitis and radiographic progression. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Apr;66(4):794-802. doi: 10.1002/art.38304.
PMID: 24757132DERIVEDBaker JF, Baker DG, Toedter G, Shults J, Von Feldt JM, Leonard MB. Associations between vitamin D, disease activity, and clinical response to therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012 Sep-Oct;30(5):658-64. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
PMID: 22776409DERIVEDTaylor PC, Ritchlin C, Mendelsohn A, Baker D, Kim L, Xu Z, Mack M, Kremer J. Maintenance of efficacy and safety with subcutaneous golimumab among patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who previously received intravenous golimumab. J Rheumatol. 2011 Dec;38(12):2572-80. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.110570. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
PMID: 22089463DERIVEDKremer J, Ritchlin C, Mendelsohn A, Baker D, Kim L, Xu Z, Han J, Taylor P. Golimumab, a new human anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha antibody, administered intravenously in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: Forty-eight-week efficacy and safety results of a phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Apr;62(4):917-28. doi: 10.1002/art.27348.
PMID: 20131276DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The count of patients with any nonserious adverse events (NAE) excludes patients who only had NAE that occurred in \<=5% of patients.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Senior Director Clinical Research
- Organization
- Centocor, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Centocor, Inc. Clinical Trial
Centocor, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 4, 2006
First Posted
August 8, 2006
Study Start
September 1, 2006
Primary Completion
December 1, 2007
Study Completion
September 1, 2009
Last Updated
July 29, 2014
Results First Posted
August 24, 2012
Record last verified: 2014-07