NCT00359164

Brief Summary

To determine if Visudyne photodynamic therapy (low or very low fluence rate) combined with intravitreal injections of bevacizumab (Avastin) compared with bevacizumab alone will, with similar safety and efficacy, delay time to retreatment with bevacizumab after the initial treatment, in subjects with new wet AMD Hypothesis: PDT in combination with Avastin at either the low or very low fluence rate will delay time to retreatment and reduce the average number of treatments required, compared to Avastin alone, but will have a similar safety and efficacy profile.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
36

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2006

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2006

Completed
27 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 28, 2006

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 1, 2006

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2008

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2008

Completed
Last Updated

August 14, 2008

Status Verified

August 1, 2008

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

July 28, 2006

Last Update Submit

August 12, 2008

Conditions

Keywords

AMDAvastinVisudyneMedical condition being studied AMD

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • To determine if Visudyne therapy (low or very low fluence rate) combined with bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab alone will, with similar safety and efficacy, delay time to retreatment with bevacizumab

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • To determine if Visudyne therapy (low or very low fluence rate) combined with bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab alone will, with similar safety and efficacy, reduce the average number of bevacizumab treatments

Study Arms (3)

1

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Bevacizumab with verteporfin at Low Fluence Photodynamic Therapy.

Drug: Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy (Low Fluence) and bevacizumab

2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Bevacizumab with verteporfin at Very Low Photodynamic Therapy.

Drug: Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy (Very Low Fluence) and bevacizumab

3

SHAM COMPARATOR

Bevacizumab with verteporfin with Sham Photodynamic Therapy.

Drug: Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy (SHAM) and bevacizumab

Interventions

Bevacizumab 1.25 mg with verteporfin at Low Fluence (300 mW/cm2 delivered for 83 seconds \[light dose of 25 J/cm2\]) Photodynamic Therapy. Treatment at Baseline visit, followed by an "as needed" basis. Assessments monthly for bevacizumab and at 3-month intervals for combination therapy with verteporfin or sham.

Also known as: Verteporfin = Visudyne, Bevacizumab = Avastin
1

Bevacizumab 1.25 mg with verteporfin at Low Fluence (150 mW/cm2 delivered for 83 seconds \[light dose of 12.5 J/cm2\]) Photodynamic Therapy. Treatment at Baseline visit, followed by an "as needed" basis. Assessments monthly for bevacizumab and at 3-month intervals for combination therapy with verteporfin or sham.

Also known as: Verteporfin = Visudyne, Bevacizumab = Avastin
2

Bevacizumab with SHAM (150 mW/cm2 delivered for 83 seconds \[light dose of 12.5 J/cm2\]) Photodynamic Therapy. Treatment at Baseline visit, followed by an "as needed" basis. Assessments monthly for bevacizumab and at 3-month intervals for combination therapy with verteporfin or sham.

Also known as: Verteporfin = Visudyne, Bevacizumab = Avastin
3

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • new wet AMD

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Vancouver General Hospital Eye Care Centre (UBC)

Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 3N9, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Macular Degeneration

Interventions

BevacizumabVerteporfinsalicylhydroxamic acid

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Retinal DegenerationRetinal DiseasesEye Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodiesImmunoglobulinsImmunoproteinsBlood ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsSerum GlobulinsGlobulinsPorphyrinsTetrapyrrolesPyrrolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingMacrocyclic CompoundsPolycyclic Compounds

Study Officials

  • Michael Potter, MD

    The University of British Columbia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 28, 2006

First Posted

August 1, 2006

Study Start

July 1, 2006

Primary Completion

June 1, 2008

Study Completion

August 1, 2008

Last Updated

August 14, 2008

Record last verified: 2008-08

Locations