Comparison Between Radiofrequency Versus Ethanol Injection for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Comparative Study Between Radiofrequency and Ethanol Injection for the Ablation of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Associated With Liver Cirrhosis
1 other identifier
interventional
240
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Ethanol injection has been for many years the standard approach as percutaneous treatment of non-surgical early hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients. Radiofrequency ablation has been proposed as an alternative approach and some retrospective and prospective comparative trials indicated its better performance for the local control of the disease in comparison to ethanol injection. Some prospective randomized studies from Japan and from Taiwan reported also an increase of overall survival in the patients treated by Radiofrequency. Aim of this study is to compare the two techniques in a prospective randomized trial in western patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Jan 2001
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2001
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 19, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 21, 2006
CompletedJuly 25, 2006
March 1, 2006
July 19, 2006
July 21, 2006
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sustained complete response at one year after the treatment.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
early complete response(forty days after treatment)
overall survival at the fourth year after the first treatment
complications
costs.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Included were cirrhotic patients in Child-Pugh class A/B with 1 to 3 HCC nodes of ≤ 30mm in diameter.
You may not qualify if:
- Excluded were patients without liver cirrhosis, in Child-Pugh class C, with a platelets count \<40000, INR \>1.75, PTT \>40sec, hypo vascular HCC, lesions not detectable by ultrasonography (US), lesions close (≤1cm) to the gallbladder, hepatic hilum, colon or stomach, with venous invasion or metastatic disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Battista di Torino
Torino, 10126, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Lencioni RA, Allgaier HP, Cioni D, Olschewski M, Deibert P, Crocetti L, Frings H, Laubenberger J, Zuber I, Blum HE, Bartolozzi C. Small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: randomized comparison of radio-frequency thermal ablation versus percutaneous ethanol injection. Radiology. 2003 Jul;228(1):235-40. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2281020718. Epub 2003 May 20.
PMID: 12759473BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Franco Brunello, MD
Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Battista di Torino
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 19, 2006
First Posted
July 21, 2006
Study Start
January 1, 2001
Study Completion
March 1, 2006
Last Updated
July 25, 2006
Record last verified: 2006-03