NCT00348569

Brief Summary

To compare computed tomography (CT) images (pictures) of the coronary arteries using the General Electric (GE) LightSpeed VCT scanner with x-ray coronary angiography in patients with typical or atypical chest pain suspected of coronary artery disease (CAD).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
245

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2006

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2006

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 30, 2006

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 4, 2006

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 31, 2007

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 31, 2007

Completed
Last Updated

April 29, 2019

Status Verified

April 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

June 30, 2006

Last Update Submit

April 25, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

CTCoronaryCardiacAngiographyX-rayCADChest pain

Study Arms (1)

64 Channel VCT

EXPERIMENTAL

All subjects underwent Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography (CCTA) after receiving an intravenous (IV) administration of Visipaque (320 mgI/mL), to be followed 2 to 21 days later by catheter coronary angiography (CATH).

Device: 64 Channel VCT

Interventions

64 Channel VCT

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The subject has typical or atypical chest pain suspected of CAD and is referred for an elective coronary angiography.
  • The subject must be scheduled to undergo a CATH procedure between 48 hours and 3 weeks post CCTA procedure.
  • The subject must not undergo any cardiac interventional treatment between the 2 procedures.
  • The subject must have sinus rhythm with stable heart rate of ≤65 beats per minute (bpm) or if heart rate was \>65 bpm, the subject must agree to the use of beta-blocker(s) prior to the CT scan procedure to achieve stable heart rate of ≤65 bpm.

You may not qualify if:

  • The subject had an established diagnosis of CAD by a) previous CATH, b) prior myocardial infarction confirmed by ECG, or c) prior revascularization (balloon angioplasty, stent placement, or CABG).
  • The subject had a known allergy to iodinated contrast agent, including but not limited to hives, anaphylactoid or cardiovascular reactions, laryngeal edema and bronchospasm.
  • The subject had impaired renal function with a serum creatinine level of 1.7 mg/dL (150 μmol/L) or above.
  • The subject had atrial fibrillation/flutter or any irregular heart rhythm considered by the investigator to interfere with temporal acquisition of cardiac CT images.
  • The subject had a resting heart rate of \>100 bpm and/or a resting systolic blood pressure of \<100mm Hg.
  • The subject had an artificial heart valve(s).
  • The subject has had prior pacemaker or internal defibrillator lead implantation.
  • The subject's resting heart rate was \>65 bpm and beta-blocker therapy was contraindicated.
  • The subject had a contraindication to verapamil when beta-blocker therapy could not be administered. The subject had a contraindication to nitroglycerin.
  • The subject had evidence of ongoing or active clinical instability.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Robert Centofanti, MS

Princeton, New Jersey, 08540, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Min JK, Edwardes M, Lin FY, Labounty T, Weinsaft JW, Choi JH, Delago A, Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Budoff MJ. Relationship of coronary artery plaque composition to coronary artery stenosis severity: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY trial. Atherosclerosis. 2011 Dec;219(2):573-8. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.05.032. Epub 2011 May 31.

  • Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E, Scherer M, Bellinger R, Martin A, Benton R, Delago A, Min JK. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Nov 18;52(21):1724-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.031.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery DiseaseChest Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular DiseasesPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Robert Centofanti, MS

    GE Healthcare

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 30, 2006

First Posted

July 4, 2006

Study Start

May 1, 2006

Primary Completion

January 31, 2007

Study Completion

January 31, 2007

Last Updated

April 29, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-04

Locations