Prevalence of Ambivalence Regarding Prenatal Testing
Facilitating Informed for Prenatal Testing: The Role of Ambivalence
2 other identifiers
observational
N/A
1 country
6
Brief Summary
This study will examine how women think and feel about prenatal testing (amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling), how those thoughts and feelings change over time, and how they contribute to the decision whether or not to undergo prenatal testing. Prenatal diagnostic testing is offered to pregnant women at increased risk of carrying a baby affected with a genetic or chromosomal abnormality. Although these tests are well established, standard-of-care procedures, much remains unknown about how best to ensure that women make decisions about whether or not to undergo testing that are consistent with their beliefs and values. This study will explore the extent to which women are ambivalent about prenatal testing and determine how they might benefit from counseling aimed at improving the quality of their decision-making. Women 18 years of age and older who are scheduled for a prenatal genetics visit at clinics in Baltimore, MD; Minneapolis, MN; Binghamton, NY; Salt Lake City, UT; Washington, DC; and Bellevue, WA, and are at increased risk for having a baby with trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) may be eligible for this study. Participants complete two short questionnaires and a telephone interview about their thoughts and feelings regarding prenatal testing. The first two surveys examine the women's thoughts and feelings before and after prenatal counseling. Both are completed at the prenatal clinic-one before and one after the counseling session. The third survey is done by telephone a few weeks after the prenatal visit to find out if the participant did or did not have prenatal testing and learn about her thoughts and feelings regarding her decision.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Dec 2004
Typical duration for all trials
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 17, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 19, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 21, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 10, 2007
CompletedJuly 2, 2017
December 10, 2007
June 19, 2006
June 30, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women must be equal to or greater than or equal to 18 years of age, speak English and be competent to consent to participate in the study.
- Participants must be pregnant women at increased risk for carrying a fetus with trisomy 21 determined by maternal age or an abnormal screening test, such as ultrasound and/or triple tests.
You may not qualify if:
- Women will be excluded form participation if they have ever previously undergone prenatal (in current pregnancy or in a past pregnancy) or participated in prenatal genetic counseling.
- Women will also be excluded from the study if they have a family history (at least one first degree relative) of a genetic condition and are seeking prenatal testing for genetic indication including trisomy 21.
- Women at increased risk for other chromosomal or genetic conditions will be excluded.
- Children and men are excluded as women are the patients in prenatal genetics clinic and the ultimate decision-makers about prenatal testing.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
Georgetown University
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007-2197, United States
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
Abbott Northwestern Hospital
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407, United States
Genetic Counsel Program
Binghamton, New York, 13905, United States
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112, United States
Eastside Maternal Fetal Medicine
Bellevue, Washington, 98004, United States
Related Publications (1)
Conner M, Povey R, Sparks P, James R, Shepherd R. Moderating role of attitudinal ambivalence within the theory of planned behaviour. Br J Soc Psychol. 2003 Mar;42(Pt 1):75-94. doi: 10.1348/014466603763276135.
PMID: 12713757BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 19, 2006
First Posted
June 21, 2006
Study Start
December 17, 2004
Study Completion
December 10, 2007
Last Updated
July 2, 2017
Record last verified: 2007-12-10