NCT00342069

Brief Summary

This study will examine how women think and feel about prenatal testing (amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling), how those thoughts and feelings change over time, and how they contribute to the decision whether or not to undergo prenatal testing. Prenatal diagnostic testing is offered to pregnant women at increased risk of carrying a baby affected with a genetic or chromosomal abnormality. Although these tests are well established, standard-of-care procedures, much remains unknown about how best to ensure that women make decisions about whether or not to undergo testing that are consistent with their beliefs and values. This study will explore the extent to which women are ambivalent about prenatal testing and determine how they might benefit from counseling aimed at improving the quality of their decision-making. Women 18 years of age and older who are scheduled for a prenatal genetics visit at clinics in Baltimore, MD; Minneapolis, MN; Binghamton, NY; Salt Lake City, UT; Washington, DC; and Bellevue, WA, and are at increased risk for having a baby with trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) may be eligible for this study. Participants complete two short questionnaires and a telephone interview about their thoughts and feelings regarding prenatal testing. The first two surveys examine the women's thoughts and feelings before and after prenatal counseling. Both are completed at the prenatal clinic-one before and one after the counseling session. The third survey is done by telephone a few weeks after the prenatal visit to find out if the participant did or did not have prenatal testing and learn about her thoughts and feelings regarding her decision.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2004

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

6 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 17, 2004

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 19, 2006

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 21, 2006

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 10, 2007

Completed
Last Updated

July 2, 2017

Status Verified

December 10, 2007

First QC Date

June 19, 2006

Last Update Submit

June 30, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Decision MakingGenetic CounselingPregnancy OptionsAttitudes Toward Reproductive OptionsBeliefs About Down Syndrome RiskDown Syndrome RiskPregnancy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Women must be equal to or greater than or equal to 18 years of age, speak English and be competent to consent to participate in the study.
  • Participants must be pregnant women at increased risk for carrying a fetus with trisomy 21 determined by maternal age or an abnormal screening test, such as ultrasound and/or triple tests.

You may not qualify if:

  • Women will be excluded form participation if they have ever previously undergone prenatal (in current pregnancy or in a past pregnancy) or participated in prenatal genetic counseling.
  • Women will also be excluded from the study if they have a family history (at least one first degree relative) of a genetic condition and are seeking prenatal testing for genetic indication including trisomy 21.
  • Women at increased risk for other chromosomal or genetic conditions will be excluded.
  • Children and men are excluded as women are the patients in prenatal genetics clinic and the ultimate decision-makers about prenatal testing.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (6)

Georgetown University

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007-2197, United States

Location

Johns Hopkins University

Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States

Location

Abbott Northwestern Hospital

Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407, United States

Location

Genetic Counsel Program

Binghamton, New York, 13905, United States

Location

University of Utah

Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112, United States

Location

Eastside Maternal Fetal Medicine

Bellevue, Washington, 98004, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Conner M, Povey R, Sparks P, James R, Shepherd R. Moderating role of attitudinal ambivalence within the theory of planned behaviour. Br J Soc Psychol. 2003 Mar;42(Pt 1):75-94. doi: 10.1348/014466603763276135.

    PMID: 12713757BACKGROUND

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Sponsor Type
NIH

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 19, 2006

First Posted

June 21, 2006

Study Start

December 17, 2004

Study Completion

December 10, 2007

Last Updated

July 2, 2017

Record last verified: 2007-12-10

Locations