Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel Open-Label Study in Advanced Parkinson's Disease
An Open-Label, 12-Month Safety and Efficacy Study of Levodopa - Carbidopa Intestinal Gel in Levodopa-Responsive Subjects With Advanced Parkinson's Disease and Severe Motor Fluctuations Despite Optimized Treatment With Available Parkinson's Disease Medications
2 other identifiers
interventional
354
16 countries
83
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study will be to provide further evidence of the long-term safety and tolerability of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (Duodopa®) over 12-months in participants with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) and severe motor fluctuations.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Jan 2008
Typical duration for phase_3
83 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 8, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 9, 2006
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 16, 2015
CompletedJanuary 16, 2015
January 1, 2015
4.4 years
June 8, 2006
January 12, 2015
January 12, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (13)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs
AE=any untoward medical occurrence which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that: results in death; is life-threatening (an event in which the subject was at risk of death at the time of the event); requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or other important medical events. Treatment-emergent events (TEAE or TESAE)=those starting after the first dose of study drug. Severe=severity reported as 'severe' or missing. Possibly or Probably Treatment Related=drug-event relationship reported as 'possible', 'probable' or missing. Death=a fatal outcome of an SAE or AE.
Screening through Day 378 + 30 days
Number of Participants With Device Complications During the Nasojejunal (NJ) Test Period
Complications of the infusion device were collected during the NJ Test period. Pump, intestinal tube, NJ tube, and other complications included (but were not limited to) device breakage, device leakage, device malfunction, device misuse, device occlusion, intentional and unintentional device removal by participant, complication of device insertion, device dislocation, device breakage, device dislocation, and post-procedural hemorrhage.
NJ Test Period (from 2 to 14 days)
Number of Participants With Device Complications During the Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy - With Jejunal Extension Tube (PEG-J) Surgery and Post-PEG Long Term Treatment Periods
Complications of the infusion device were collected during the PEG-J Surgery and Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment periods. Pump, PEG-J, stoma, and other complications included (but were not limited to) device breakage, device leakage, device malfunction, device misuse, device occlusion, intentional and unintentional device removal by participant, complication of device insertion, device dislocation, device breakage, device dislocation, and post-procedural hemorrhage.
PEG-J Surgery Period (from 2 to 14 days) through the Long Term Treatment Period (Day 28 to Day 378)
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology Parameters
Potentially clinically significant values for red blood cells (RBCs), hemoglobin, and hematocrit are specified for females (f) and males (m) separately in the category rows.
Screening through Day 378
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry Parameters
Terms abbreviated in the table include aspartate aminotransferase (AST), upper limit of normal (ULN), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), female (f), and male (m).
Screening through Day 378
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign Parameters
Terms abbreviated in the table include supine systolic blood pressure (SuSBP), standing systolic blood pressure (StSBP), orthostatic systolic blood pressure (OSBP), supine diastolic blood pressure (SuDBP), standing diastolic blood pressure (StDBP), orthostatic diastolic blood pressure (ODBP), supine pulse (SuP) in beats per minute (bpm), standing pulse (StP), and body temperature (Temp). Increase and decrease are signified by ↑ and ↓, respectively.
up to 56 weeks
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters
Terms abbreviated in the table include heart rate (HR) in beats per minute (bpm), PR interval (PRI), QT interval corrected for heart rate using Bazett's formula (QTcB), and QT interval corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula (QTcF). Increase and decrease are signified by ↑ and ↓, respectively.
Screening through Day 378
Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks at Baseline
To prospectively monitor for the possible development of sleep attacks, participants were asked if they had experienced any events in which they fell asleep suddenly or unexpectedly, including while engaged in some activity (e.g., eating/drinking, speaking, or driving) or at rest, with or without any previous warning of sleepiness. Those participants who reported 1 or more sleep attacks were asked to report the number of sleep attacks they experienced, whether they experienced sleepiness or drowsiness prior to the sleep attack, whether they experienced a 'bad' outcome or problem due to a sleep attack, and if so, how many 'bad' outcomes or problems they experienced.
Baseline
Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks During the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment Period
To prospectively monitor for the possible development of sleep attacks, participants were asked if they had experienced any events in which they fell asleep suddenly or unexpectedly, including while engaged in some activity (e.g., eating/drinking, speaking, or driving) or at rest, with or without any previous warning of sleepiness. Those participants who reported 1 or more sleep attacks were asked to report the number of sleep attacks they experienced, whether they experienced sleepiness or drowsiness prior to the sleep attack, whether they experienced a 'bad' outcome or problem due to a sleep attack, and if so, how many 'bad' outcomes or problems they experienced.
During the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment Period (Day 28 through Day 378)
Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and During the Post-PEG Long-term Treatment (PPLT) Period
The MIDI is a validated assessment of impulsive behavior consisting of a semistructured clinical interview assessing pathological gambling, trichotillomania (compulsive hair-pulling), kleptomania (compulsive stealing), pyromania (compulsive fire setting), intermittent explosive disorder, compulsive buying, and compulsive sexual behavior.
Baseline, during the Post-PEG Long-term Treatment Period (Day 28 through Day 378)
Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score at Endpoint
The AIMS is an investigator-completed rating scale that has a total of 12 items rating involuntary movements of various areas of the participant's body. Items 1 through 10 are rated on a 5-point scale of severity from 0 (none), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), to 4 (severe), and items 11 and 12 are yes/no questions regarding issues with teeth or dentures. The total AIMS score was calculated by summing items 1-10, with a possible range of 0-40; a negative change indicates improvement. The AIMS was to be performed at consistent times, when the subject was experiencing his/her worst "On" time (dyskinesia \[involuntary muscle movement\]).
Baseline, Endpoint (last Post-PEG Long-Term Period visit up to Day 378)
Number of Participants With Confirmed Cases of Melanoma
A comprehensive assessment for the presence of melanoma was performed during the screening period and at early termination or end of study by a dermatologist experienced with the diagnosis of the condition. If a suspicious lesion was present, a biopsy was obtained for proper diagnosis.
Screening up to Day 378
Number of Participants Taking at Least 1 Concomitant Medication During the Study
Concomitant medications include those started on or after the first open-label LCIG infusion as well as medications started prior to the first open-label infusion but continued during the study.
Screening up to Day 378
Secondary Outcomes (21)
Change From Baseline in Average Daily "Off" Time at Endpoint
Baseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Normalized "On" Time With Troublesome Dyskinesia at Endpoint
Baseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)
Change From Baseline in Average Daily "On" Time Without Troublesome Dyskinesia at Endpoint
Baseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)
Clinical Global Impression - Status (CGI-S) Score at Baseline and Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Endpoint
Baseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)
Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part I Score at Month 12
Baseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)
- +16 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)
EXPERIMENTALAll participants were to receive LCIG, via the NJ tube during the nasojejunal (NJ) Test Period and delivered to the proximal small intestine via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy - with jejunal extension tube (PEG-J) during the Post-PEG-J Long-Term Treatment Period. The starting dose was individually determined based on the daily dose of oral levodopa prior to study enrollment. The infusion dose was individually optimized for each participant on the basis of response and potential adverse events. During the Post-PEG-J Long-Term Treatment Period, LCIG was expected to be infused continuously over approximately 16 hours daily with a rate of infusion ranging from 1 to 10 mL/hour (20 to 200 mg of levodopa/hour), in most instances.
Interventions
Infusion should be kept within a range of 0.5-10 mL/hour (10-200 mg levodopa/hour) and is usually 2-6 mL/hour (40-120 mg levodopa/hour).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) according to United Kingdom Parkinson's Disease Society (UKPDS) Brain Bank Criteria
- Levodopa-responsive with severe motor fluctuations
- Recognizable off and on state (motor fluctuations) confirmed by diary
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosis is unclear or a suspicion of other parkinsonian syndromes exists such as secondary parkinsonism
- Undergone surgery for the treatment of PD
- Contraindications to levodopa (such as narrow angle glaucoma)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)lead
- Quintiles, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (83)
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50065
Birmingham, Alabama, 35222, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50059
Fountain Valley, California, 92708, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50048
Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50076
Oceanside, California, 92056, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50061
Englewood, Colorado, 80113, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50079
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50077
Bradenton, Florida, 34205, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50060
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33308, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50049
Gainesville, Florida, 32610, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50047
Jacksonville, Florida, 32209, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50068
Port Charlotte, Florida, 33890, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50046
Tampa, Florida, 33613, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50062
Augusta, Georgia, 30912, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50050
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50078
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50064
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50075
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71103, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50080
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50074
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50073
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50042
Omaha, Nebraska, 68198-2045, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50072
Manhasset, New York, 11030, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50067
New York, New York, 10029, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50066
New York, New York, 10032, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50069
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50063
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50043
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50044
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195-0001, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50058
Burlington, Vermont, 05401, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50045
Kirkland, Washington, 98034, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50070
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46429
Adelaide, 5000, Australia
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46427
Heidelberg, 3084, Australia
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46425
Westmead, 2145, Australia
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 54545
Edmonton, T6G 2B7, Canada
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46433
Montreal, H2L 4M1, Canada
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46434
Toronto, M5T 2S8, Canada
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46436
Brno, 65691, Czechia
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46438
Hradec Králové, 500 05, Czechia
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46435
Pardubice, 532 03, Czechia
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46437
Prague, 128 08, Czechia
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46439
Prague, 15006, Czechia
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 48003
Lahti, 15850, Finland
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 48028
Berlin, 12200, Germany
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 48029
Berlin, 13088, Germany
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 48036
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106, Germany
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 48034
Göttingen, 37075, Germany
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 48022
Hanau, 63450, Germany
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 48024
Hanover, 30625, Germany
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 48035
Mainz, 55131, Germany
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 49882
Tel Aviv, 64239, Israel
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50131
Arcugnano, 36057, Italy
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50132
Catania, 95125, Italy
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50128
Genoa, 16132, Italy
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50129
Lido di Camaiore, 55043, Italy
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50130
Naples, 80131, Italy
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50127
Rome, 00163, Italy
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50138
Nijmegen, 6532 SZ, Netherlands
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50126
Auckland, 1010, New Zealand
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50123
Christchurch, 8011, New Zealand
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50124
Hamilton, 3204, New Zealand
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50125
Wellington, 6002, New Zealand
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50140
Lodz, 93-113, Poland
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50139
Poznan, 61-485, Poland
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50136
Almada, 2805-267, Portugal
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50134
Coimbra, 3000-075, Portugal
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50135
Lisbon, 1649-035, Portugal
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50137
Porto, 4200-319, Portugal
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50143
Kazan', 420061, Russia
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50141
Moscow, 125367, Russia
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50145
Saint Petersburg, 193312, Russia
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50142
Saint Petersburg, 194044, Russia
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50147
Saint Petersburg, 197089, Russia
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50146
Saint Petersburg, 197706, Russia
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50154
Barcelona, 08003, Spain
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50152
Barcelona, 08025, Spain
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50202
Barcelona, 08035, Spain
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50155
Barcelona, 08036, Spain
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50153
Madrid, 28034, Spain
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50150
Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50151
Bangkok, 10700, Thailand
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50149
Liverpool, L9 7LJ, United Kingdom
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 50148
London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom
Related Publications (3)
Chang FC, Kwan V, van der Poorten D, Mahant N, Wolfe N, Ha AD, Griffith JM, Tsui D, Kim SD, Fung VS. Intraduodenal levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel infusion improves both motor performance and quality of life in advanced Parkinson's disease. J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Mar;25:41-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.05.059. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
PMID: 26777085DERIVEDLew MF, Slevin JT, Kruger R, Martinez Castrillo JC, Chatamra K, Dubow JS, Robieson WZ, Benesh JA, Fung VS. Initiation and dose optimization for levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel: Insights from phase 3 clinical trials. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2015 Jul;21(7):742-8. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.04.022. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
PMID: 25962554DERIVEDFernandez HH, Standaert DG, Hauser RA, Lang AE, Fung VS, Klostermann F, Lew MF, Odin P, Steiger M, Yakupov EZ, Chouinard S, Suchowersky O, Dubow J, Hall CM, Chatamra K, Robieson WZ, Benesh JA, Espay AJ. Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel in advanced Parkinson's disease: final 12-month, open-label results. Mov Disord. 2015 Apr;30(4):500-9. doi: 10.1002/mds.26123. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
PMID: 25545465DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Global Medical Services
- Organization
- AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Janet Benesh
AbbVie
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 8, 2006
First Posted
June 9, 2006
Study Start
January 1, 2008
Primary Completion
June 1, 2012
Study Completion
June 1, 2012
Last Updated
January 16, 2015
Results First Posted
January 16, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-01