Comparison of Papillary Balloon Dilatation Vs.Sphincterotomy for Lithotripsy in Difficult Sphincterotomy or Distal CBD Tapering
Comparison of Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilatation and Sphincterotomy for CBD Stones With Difficult Sphincterotomy or Distal CBD Tapering
1 other identifier
observational
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Compare endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation vs. endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in:
- when sphincterotomy is difficult (periampullary diverticulum, prior sphincterotomy or Billroth II anastomosis)
- when there is distal CBD tapering.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Mar 2006
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 24, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 25, 2006
CompletedMay 25, 2006
April 1, 2006
May 24, 2006
May 24, 2006
Conditions
Keywords
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Choledocholithiasis with
- Difficult sphincterotomy:periampullary diverticulum, prior sphincterotomy or Billroth II anastomosis
- or distal CBD tapering.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients in whom no endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation or endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed for lithotripsy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, 100, Taiwan
Related Publications (1)
1. Minami A, Nakatsu T, Uchida N, Hirabayashi S, Fukuma H, Morshed SA, Nishioka M. Papillary dilation vs sphincterotomy in endoscopic removal of bile duct stones. A randomized trial with manometric function. Dig Dis Sci 1995;40:2550-4. 2. Bergman JJ, Rauws EA, Fockens P, van Berkel AM, Bossuyt PM, Tijssen JG, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K. Randomised trial of endoscopic balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile duct stones. Lancet 1997;349:1124-9. 3.Komatsu Y, Kawabe T, Toda N, Ohashi M, Isayama M, Tateishi K, Sato S, Koike Y, Yamagata M, Tada M, Shiratori Y, Yamada H, Ihori M, Kawase T, Omata M. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for the management of common bile duct stones: experience of 226 cases. Endoscopy 1998;30:12-7. 4. Fujita N, Maguchi H, Komatsu Y, Yasuda I, Hasebe O, Igarashi Y, Murakami A, Mukai H, Fujii T, Yamao K, Maeshiro K. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation for bile duct stones: A prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57:151-5.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wei Chih Liao, MD.
National Taiwan University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- DEFINED POPULATION
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 24, 2006
First Posted
May 25, 2006
Study Start
March 1, 2006
Study Completion
May 1, 2006
Last Updated
May 25, 2006
Record last verified: 2006-04