FCM Versus R-FCM Followed by R-Maintenance or Observation Only
Treatment of Relapsed CBCC, CC and LPIC Lymphoma With FCM Chemotherapy Alone or in Combination With the Monoclonal Anti CD 20 Antibody Rituximab Followed by Anti-CD 20 Maintenance or Observation Only
1 other identifier
interventional
319
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this phase III trial is to assess the safety and efficacy of treatment with rituximab in combination with FCM chemotherapy (R-FCM) versus FCM chemotherapy alone for remission induction and to asses the safety and efficacy of rituximab maintenance versus observation only after response to induction therapy. Both questions are addressed in way of a prospective randomized comparison in patients with relapsed FL, MCL and LP lymphoma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Nov 1998
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 1998
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2001
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 20, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 24, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2021
CompletedMay 7, 2021
May 1, 2021
2.6 years
April 20, 2006
May 6, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Remission rate
Event free interval
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Time to Progression
Overall survival
adverse events
serious infectious complications
Study Arms (4)
FCM
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll patients underwent a central randomization procedure. Randomization was done by a Computer program stratified for histology, Response to the preceding chemotherapy, and the number of previous chemotherapies using the method of permutuated blocks. The FCM combination comprised: 25 mg/m2 fludarabine per day iv over 30 minutes, days 1 to 3 200 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide per day as a 4-hour-infusion, days 1 to 3 8 mg/m2 mitoxantrone per day iv over 30 minutes, day 1 4 treatment Cycles á 4 weeks per cycle In patients with peripheral lymphocyte Counts more than 20.000/mm3 and/or a large Tumor mass (ie, bulky disease more than 10 cm) a cytoreductive pre-phase could be performed, comprising cyclophosphamide at a dose of 200 mg/m2 as a 1-hour-infusion over 3 to 5 days.
R-FCM
EXPERIMENTALAll patients underwent a central randomization procedure. Randomization was done by a Computer program stratified for histology, Response to the preceding chemotherapy, and the number of previous chemotherapies using the method of permutuated blocks. The R-FCM combination comprised: 375 mg/m2 rituximab on the day before the respective FCM course. 25 mg/m2 fludarabine per day iv over 30 minutes, days 1 to 3 200 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide per day as a 4-hour-infusion, days 1 to 3 8 mg/m2 mitoxantrone per day iv over 30 minutes, day 1 4 treatment Cycles á 4 weeks per cycle In patients with peripheral lymphocyte Counts more than 20.000/mm3 and/or a large Tumor mass (ie, bulky disease more than 10 cm) a cytoreductive pre-phase could be performed, comprising cyclophosphamide at a dose of 200 mg/m2 as a 1-hour-infusion over 3 to 5 days.
Observation only
OTHERPatients achieving a complete or partial remission after FCM or R-FCM underwent a subsequent randomization for 2 courses of rituximab to be given 3 and 6 months after completion of salvage therapy versus observation only. This second randomization was stratified for the type of salvage therapy with FCM or R-FCM, the Response to this Treatment (CR or PR), and histology.
rituximab maintenance
OTHERPatients achieving a complete or partial remission after FCM or R-FCM underwent a subsequent randomization for 2 courses of rituximab to be given 3 and 6 months after completion of salvage therapy versus observation only. Courses of rituximab consisted of 4 doses of 375 mg/m2 per day given at 4 consecutive weeks. This second randomization was stratified for the type of salvage therapy with FCM or R-FCM, the Response to this Treatment (CR or PR), and histology.
Interventions
2 courses of rituximab maintenance after completion of salvage therapy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients with histologically proven stage III/IV centroblastic/centrocytic (FL), centrocytic (MCL)or lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma (LPIC).
- relapsed disease after initial chemotherapy or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation
- two-dimensionally measurable lesion outside a previously irradiated area (osteoblastic bone lesions, ascites, and pleural effusions are not evaluable)
- age \> 18 years
- Karnofsky-index \> 60
- life expectancy of at least 3 months
- effective contraception in female premenopausal patients
- patient's written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- age \< 18 years
- Karnofsky-index \< 60
- treatment with fludarabine or mitoxantrone within the preceding three months
- active auto-immune hemolytic anemia at the start of FCM chemotherapy
- participation in another clinical trial during the last 4 weeks
- participation in this study before
- previous treatment with murine antibodies
- concurrent diseases which exclude the administration of therapy as outlined by the study protocol
- non-compensated heart failure
- dilatative cardiomyopathy
- coronary heart disease with ST segment depression in ECG
- myocardial infarction during the last 6 months
- chronic lung disease with hypoxemia
- severe non-compensated hypertension
- severe non-compensated diabetes mellitus
- +8 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
German Low Grade Study Group (Glsg)
Munich, D-81377, Germany
Related Publications (2)
Forstpointner R, Dreyling M, Repp R, Hermann S, Hanel A, Metzner B, Pott C, Hartmann F, Rothmann F, Rohrberg R, Bock HP, Wandt H, Unterhalt M, Hiddemann W; German Low-Grade Lymphoma Study Group. The addition of rituximab to a combination of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone (FCM) significantly increases the response rate and prolongs survival as compared with FCM alone in patients with relapsed and refractory follicular and mantle cell lymphomas: results of a prospective randomized study of the German Low-Grade Lymphoma Study Group. Blood. 2004 Nov 15;104(10):3064-71. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-04-1323. Epub 2004 Jul 29.
PMID: 15284112RESULTForstpointner R, Unterhalt M, Dreyling M, Bock HP, Repp R, Wandt H, Pott C, Seymour JF, Metzner B, Hanel A, Lehmann T, Hartmann F, Einsele H, Hiddemann W; German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group (GLSG). Maintenance therapy with rituximab leads to a significant prolongation of response duration after salvage therapy with a combination of rituximab, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and mitoxantrone (R-FCM) in patients with recurring and refractory follicular and mantle cell lymphomas: Results of a prospective randomized study of the German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group (GLSG). Blood. 2006 Dec 15;108(13):4003-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-04-016725. Epub 2006 Aug 31.
PMID: 16946304RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hiddemann Wolfgang, PhD
University Hospital Großhadern/LMU, Dept. of Medicine III
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Hiddemann
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 20, 2006
First Posted
April 24, 2006
Study Start
November 1, 1998
Primary Completion
June 1, 2001
Study Completion
June 1, 2021
Last Updated
May 7, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-05