Low Dose Sirolimus or CsA-Based Maintenance Immunosuppression After Induction With Campath-1 in Kidney Transplantation
A Prospective, Randomized Study to Compare the Effect of Campath-1,Low Dose Sirolimus Versus Campath-1H, Low Dose CsA Both in Addition to Low Dose Mycophenolate Mofetil on Phenotypic and Functional Profiles of PBMCs in Kidney Transplant Recipients in a Steroid-Free Regimen
1 other identifier
interventional
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
During the past 15 years, however, the superior immunosuppressive efficacy of CsA and the well-known toxicity of long-term steroid therapy have prompted trials of steroid withdrawal from renal allograft recipients at various intervals after transplantation. Steroid withdrawal or avoidance must be balanced against the associated risk of precipitating acute allograft rejection. Moreover, with the current immunosuppressive regimens, by 10 years approximately 50% of grafts will have been lost due mainly to chronic rejection or the side-effects of immunosuppressive therapy. Thus, the quest for therapies that might induce specific immune tolerance - ideally via short-term interventions that would target only the pathogenic immune response and leave the protective host immune response unimpaired - has provided a "holy grail" for transplant immunologists. The humanized IgG monoclonal antibody Campath-1H has been hypothesized to provide enough immunosuppression that would allow maintenance therapy with low-dose CsA, and possibly reprogramming the immune system so to encourage tolerance processes. Despite Campath-1H immunosuppressive regimens have been claimed to induce a condition of "almost tolerance", this has not been proved nor evidence of development of persistent regulatory immune responses long-term post transplant has been provided. Thus, characterizing phenotypically and functionally distinct subsets of T-regulatory cells possibly generated selectively in non-rejecting transplant recipients in Campath-1H-based immunosuppressive regimens may help to find new noninvasive markers of immune system activation to tailor immunosuppressive protocols. The primary aim of the study is to compare the effect of Campath-1H, low dose sirolimus versus Campath-1H, low dose CsA, both in addition to low dose MMF on phenotypic and functional profiles of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in kidney transplant recipients in a steroid-free regimen.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Feb 2003
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2003
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 30, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 31, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2010
CompletedMay 22, 2006
March 1, 2006
March 30, 2006
May 18, 2006
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Time course of immunophenotyping and lymphocyte function assays in the two groups of kidney transplant recipients randomized to low-dose sirolimus or CsA- based maintenance immunosuppression after Campath-1H induction therapy
Graft function and survival
Safety of induction therapy with Campath-1H and low-dose maintenance immunosuppressive regimen
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Eligible kidney transplant according to standard criteria
- Recipient of first kidney transplant
- Cadaver or living-related donor
- Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Panel reactive antibodies titer \>50%
- HLA identical
- High risk of recurrence of renal disease (FSGS, vasculitis, membranous nephropathy)
- Primary and secondary hyperlipidemia
- Platelet count \<150000/microliter
- Specific contraindication to the study drug
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital "Ospedali Riuniti" of Bergamo
Bergamo, 24128, Italy
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Norberto Perico, MD
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 30, 2006
First Posted
March 31, 2006
Study Start
February 1, 2003
Study Completion
April 1, 2010
Last Updated
May 22, 2006
Record last verified: 2006-03