Comparison of Airway Clearance Efficacy of Two High Frequency Chest Wall Oscillation (HFCWO) Devices in Cystic Fibrosis
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) must perform daily bronchial drainage therapy (BD) to keep their airways clear of secretions. Many different techniques are available to achieve this and there is currently no agreement as to which form of therapy is most effective. High frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO is used for this purpose by CF patients throughout the United States and abroad. To perform this therapy, the patient wears a vest which fits over the entire torso and is connected to an air compressor. The compressor generates oscillating air pulses that are transmitted to the lungs, thereby mobilizing secretions. The oscillations produced by the most commonly used device have a sinusoidal wave form (The Vestâ„¢ Airway Clearance System, Hill-Rom Inc, St Paul, MN). Previous studies indicate this form of therapy is as effective as more traditional and cumbersome forms of therapy. The design of the pulse generator has been recently modified so that the oscillations produced have a triangular wave form (Respitech Inc, MN). Studies done at the University of Minnesota found that the air flows induced in the airways can vary substantially depending on the wave form applied to the chest. At present, the impact of using a triangular wave form on mucus removal is unknown. The proposed study will compare mucous clearance using a device generating sine wave oscillations to a device generating triangular wave oscillations. Hypothesis: Bronchial drainage using a triangular wave form of HFCWO will result in superior sputum production compared to HFCWO using a sine wave form. Secondary Hypotheses: Bronchial drainage using a triangular wave form of HFCWO may result in sputum with rheologic properties distinct from sputum produced while using sine wave HFCWO. Bronchial drainage using a triangular wave form of HFCWO may result in superior post-therapy pulmonary function tests compared to pulmonary function tests obtained following therapy with sine wave HFCWO. Subjects will perceive bronchial drainage using a triangular wave form of HFCWO as more comfortable than airway clearance using sine wave HFCWO.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2006
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 28, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 30, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2006
CompletedMay 30, 2013
May 1, 2013
6 months
March 28, 2006
May 28, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Average sputum production, as assessed by sputum wet and dry weights, during each treatment session.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in pulmonary function parameters (Forced Vital Capacity and Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second and Single-breath Nitrogen Washout) before and after therapy session for each of the treatment periods.
Sputum rheologic properties (adhesivity, cohesivity and viscoelastic parameters) for each treatment period.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of CF established by sweat chloride \> 60 mmol/L.
- Age older than 18 years.
- History of chronic daily sputum production.
- Currently on a home therapeutic regimen that includes some form of BD performed at least 2 times daily that also includes concomitant use of an inhaled mucolytic and inhaled bronchodilator.
- FVC and FEV1 \> 40%-predicted, and with stable lung function (no greater than a 10% variation in lung function parameters over the preceding 4 months).
- Evaluated at the University of Minnesota CF Center 3 or more times in the preceding 12 months.
You may not qualify if:
- Hospitalization for CF pulmonary complications in the 2 months preceding enrollment.
- Hemoptysis \> 60 cc in a single episode in the 4 weeks preceding enrollment.
- Chronic chest pain.
- Participation in another clinical trial in the previous 30 days.
- Use of intravenous antibiotics in the 2 months preceding enrollment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Minnesota Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
Related Publications (1)
Kempainen RR, Williams CB, Hazelwood A, Rubin BK, Milla CE. Comparison of high-frequency chest wall oscillation with differing waveforms for airway clearance in cystic fibrosis. Chest. 2007 Oct;132(4):1227-32. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1078. Epub 2007 Sep 21.
PMID: 17890465DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robert R Kempainen, MD
University of Minnesota
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 28, 2006
First Posted
March 30, 2006
Study Start
February 1, 2006
Primary Completion
August 1, 2006
Study Completion
August 1, 2006
Last Updated
May 30, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-05