A Clinical Trial to Compare Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant 250mg, 250mg (Plus 250mg Loading Regimen) and 500mg
FINDER I
Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant 250mg, 250mg (Plus 250mg Loading Regimen) and 500mg in Postmenopausal Women With ER +ve Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy
2 other identifiers
interventional
143
1 country
35
Brief Summary
This study will assess the relationship between fulvestrant dose and efficacy, and determine the dosing regimen as a second line therapy for Japanese postmenopausal women with oestrogen receptor positive advanced breast cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Mar 2006
Longer than P75 for phase_2
35 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 20, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 22, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 29, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2012
CompletedFebruary 15, 2012
February 1, 2012
2 years
March 20, 2006
March 17, 2009
February 14, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
An objective response (OR) is defined as a patient having a best overall response of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). A patient has best overall response of CR if she had overall response of CR or PR on one visit and met the confirmation criteria per RECIST. ORR is defined as percentage of patients with objective response. Each patient with measurable disease at baseline was assessed for OR from the sequence of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) scan data up to data cut-off. RECIST scans were performed every 12 weeks (+/- 2weeks) from randomization
baseline and every 12 weeks (+/- 2weeks) from randomization data up to data cut-off (19th march 2008)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Time to Progression (TTP)
every 12 weeks from randomization (+/- 2 weeks) until data cut-off (19th march 2008)
Duration of Response (DoR)
RECIST tumour assessments carried out every 12 weeks from randomisation (+/- 2 weeks) until data cut-off on19th March 2008.
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
every 12 weeks(+/- 2 weeks) from randomization to data up to data cut-off, 19th March 2008.
Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Mean Population Clearance, a Measure of the Efficiency With Which Fulvestrant is Eliminated From the Body
Baseline to 12 weeks
Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Mean Volume of Distribution at Steady State, a Measure of the Apparent Volume in the Body Into Which Fulvestrant Distributes
Baseline to 12 weeks
Study Arms (3)
1
EXPERIMENTALFulvestrant 250 mg intramuscular injection
2
EXPERIMENTALFulvestrant 250mg (Plus 250mg Loading Regimen)
3
EXPERIMENTALFulvestrant 500 mg
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Breast Cancer has continued to grow after having received treatment with an anti-estrogen hormonal treatment such as tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor
- Requiring hormonal treatment
- Postmenopausal women defined as a woman who has stopped having menstrual periods
You may not qualify if:
- Treatment with more than one previous regimen of systemic anticancer therapy other than endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer
- Treatment with more than one previous regimen of endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer
- An existing serious disease, illness, or condition that will prevent participation or compliance with study procedures
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- AstraZenecalead
Study Sites (35)
Research Site
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan
Research Site
Asahi, Chiba, Japan
Research Site
Chiba, Chiba, Japan
Research Site
Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan
Research Site
Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan
Research Site
Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
Research Site
Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
Research Site
Daito, Fukushima, Japan
Research Site
Kōriyama, Fukushima, Japan
Research Site
Ōta, Gunma, Japan
Research Site
Fukuyama, Hiroshima, Japan
Research Site
Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan
Research Site
Kure, Hiroshima, Japan
Research Site
Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Research Site
Amagasaki, Hyōgo, Japan
Research Site
Matsubaracho, Kagoshima-ken, Japan
Research Site
Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
Research Site
Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
Research Site
Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
Research Site
Kumamoto, Kumamoto, Japan
Research Site
Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
Research Site
Niigata, Niigata, Japan
Research Site
Ōita, Oita Prefecture, Japan
Research Site
Kurashiki, Okayama-ken, Japan
Research Site
Izumisano, Osaka, Japan
Research Site
Osaka, Osaka, Japan
Research Site
Sakai, Osaka, Japan
Research Site
Suita, Osaka, Japan
Research Site
Morohongō, Saitama, Japan
Research Site
Shinden, Saitama, Japan
Research Site
Shizuoka, Shizuoka, Japan
Research Site
Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan
Research Site
Chūō, Tokyo, Japan
Research Site
Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Research Site
Kawasaki, Japan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Gerard Lynch
- Organization
- Astrazeneca
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
AstraZeneca Japan Medical Director, MD
AstraZeneca
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2006
First Posted
March 22, 2006
Study Start
March 1, 2006
Primary Completion
March 1, 2008
Study Completion
February 1, 2012
Last Updated
February 15, 2012
Results First Posted
August 29, 2011
Record last verified: 2012-02