Safety and Effectiveness of the Medtronic Resting Heart Bypass System in Heart Surgery Patients
A Prospective Randomized Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of the Medtronic Resting Heart System
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if the Medtronic Resting Heart Bypass system is safer and results in less inflammatory reaction than traditional bypass machines used in coronary artery bypass surgery. We hypothesize that the new Medtronic Resting Heart System is safer and results in much less systemic inflammatory reaction in comparison to the standard cardiopulmonary bypass systems currently in use.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Nov 2004
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 15, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 17, 2006
CompletedAugust 28, 2017
August 1, 2017
1 year
March 15, 2006
August 25, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
C-reactive protein
Cell count
Cytokine levels
Complement
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative blood loss, units of blood transfused, re-operation for bleeding, chest tube drainage, length of ICU stay, neurologic and renal function, infection, atrial fibrillation and overall length of postoperative hospital stay
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Consenting patients undergoing elective surgical coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with use of the cardiopulmonary bypass machine
You may not qualify if:
- Patients unable to provide written informed consent
- Emergency CABG surgery
- Concomitant CABG + Valvular surgery
- Off-pump CABG surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada
Related Publications (9)
Kirklin JK, Westaby S, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW, Chenoweth DE, Pacifico AD. Complement and the damaging effects of cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983 Dec;86(6):845-57.
PMID: 6606084BACKGROUNDWehlin L, Vedin J, Vaage J, Lundahl J. Activation of complement and leukocyte receptors during on- and off pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Jan;25(1):35-42. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(03)00652-3.
PMID: 14690730BACKGROUNDEdmunds LH Jr. Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Nov;66(5 Suppl):S12-6; discussion S25-8. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)00967-9.
PMID: 9869435BACKGROUNDMatata BM, Sosnowski AW, Galinanes M. Off-pump bypass graft operation significantly reduces oxidative stress and inflammation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Mar;69(3):785-91. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)01420-4.
PMID: 10750762BACKGROUNDGu YJ, Mariani MA, van Oeveren W, Grandjean JG, Boonstra PW. Reduction of the inflammatory response in patients undergoing minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Feb;65(2):420-4. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)01127-2.
PMID: 9485239BACKGROUNDFransen E, Maessen J, Dentener M, Senden N, Geskes G, Buurman W. Systemic inflammation present in patients undergoing CABG without extracorporeal circulation. Chest. 1998 May;113(5):1290-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.113.5.1290.
PMID: 9596308BACKGROUNDJewell AE, Akowuah EF, Suvarna SK, Braidley P, Hopkinson D, Cooper G. A prospective randomised comparison of cardiotomy suction and cell saver for recycling shed blood during cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003 Apr;23(4):633-6. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00834-5.
PMID: 12694789BACKGROUNDAldea GS, Soltow LO, Chandler WL, Triggs CM, Vocelka CR, Crockett GI, Shin YT, Curtis WE, Verrier ED. Limitation of thrombin generation, platelet activation, and inflammation by elimination of cardiotomy suction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting treated with heparin-bonded circuits. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Apr;123(4):742-55. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2002.120347.
PMID: 11986603BACKGROUNDKaza AK, Cope JT, Fiser SM, Long SM, Kern JA, Kron IL, Tribble CG. Elimination of fat microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Feb;75(2):555-9; discussion 559. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04540-x.
PMID: 12607672BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bob Kiaii, MD, FRCSC
Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Western Ontario and the London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 15, 2006
First Posted
March 17, 2006
Study Start
November 1, 2004
Primary Completion
November 1, 2005
Study Completion
February 1, 2006
Last Updated
August 28, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08