Dichotic Listening as a Predictor of Medication Response in Depression
3 other identifiers
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Depressed patients will have hearing tests and then be treated with up to three treatments (i.e., Fluoxetine, Imipramine) until remitted, to see whether test results predict specific outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Apr 1994
Longer than P75 for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 1994
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 24, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 27, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 15, 2019
CompletedMay 30, 2019
May 1, 2019
17.2 years
February 24, 2006
August 31, 2017
May 15, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D)
The HAM-D is a commonly used measure of the severity of depression. While several versions exist consisting of different numbers of items, virtually all include the original 17. Each item is scored from on a 3 or 5 point scale (so, from 0-2 or 0-4), with 0 indicating the item is not present and the highest item score indicating it is present nearly all the time to the severest extent. Item scores are added to obtain a total HAM-D score. Minimum possible score is 0 (indicating none of the 17 items is present), maximal possible score is 52. By convention, scores of \<=7 are accepted as indicating "remission" and scores that have decreased \>= 50% from pre-treatment indicate positive "response". Higher scores indicate worse depression, while lower scores indicate milder depression or lack of depressive symptoms.
6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Positive Response as Assessed by the Clinical Global Impression -Global Improvement Scale (CGI-I)
6 weeks.
Study Arms (1)
fluoxetine / Imipramine
EXPERIMENTALfluoxetine or Imipramine
Interventions
Phase 1: Fluoxetine: wk 1: 10 mg/day; wks 2-3: 20 mg/day; wks 4-5: 40 mg/day; wk 6: 60 mg/day; wks 7-12: 80 mg/day \*All increases only if tolerated.
Phase 2: Imipramine wk 1: 25 mg/day; wk 2: 50 mg/day; wk 3: 100 mg/day, 150 mg/day after 3 days; wk 4: 200 mg/day, 250 mg/day after 3 days; wks 5-6: 300 mg/day. \*All increases only if tolerated.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Ages between 18-65
- Meets Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 4th Edition criteria for current Major Depression, Dysthymia or Depression Not Otherwise Specified
You may not qualify if:
- Known hearing impairment
- Active suicidal ideation (history of suicide attempts will be evaluated on a case by case basis)
- Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 17-item version \> 20
- Current (past six months) alcohol and/or drug abuse or dependence
- Medical condition likely to require intervention contraindicated with study medication (e.g., known arrhythmia likely to be exacerbated by Imipramine)
- Bipolar I
- Psychosis
- If currently taking antidepressants or mood stabilizers, cannot be off psychotropic medication for 7 weeks (10 weeks for Prozac) or felt to require other psychiatric medication (other than occasional sleep or Anxiety medication)
- Premenopausal women not using known effective birth control
- Not currently depressed (whether considered due to current treatment or not)
- Nonresponse to adequate trial of both study medications (i.e., \> 4weeks on \> escitalopram 30 mg/d, and imipramine 200 mg/d); patients having an inadequate response to one study medication could be enrolled and receive the other; patients having responded to an adequate trial of either study medication would be offered a retrial; also excluded will be subjects having non responded to an adequate trial with citalopram (i.e., \> 4 weeks on \> citalopram 60 mg/d)
- Left-handed
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Depression Evaluation Service, New York State Psychiatric Institute
New York, New York, 10032, United States
Related Publications (6)
Bruder GE, Otto MW, McGrath PJ, Stewart JW, Fava M, Rosenbaum JF, Quitkin FM. Dichotic listening before and after fluoxetine treatment for major depression: relations of laterality to therapeutic response. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1996 Aug;15(2):171-9. doi: 10.1016/0893-133X(95)00180-L.
PMID: 8840353BACKGROUNDBruder GE, Stewart JW, Tenke CE, McGrath PJ, Leite P, Bhattacharya N, Quitkin FM. Electroencephalographic and perceptual asymmetry differences between responders and nonresponders to an SSRI antidepressant. Biol Psychiatry. 2001 Mar 1;49(5):416-25. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(00)01016-7.
PMID: 11274653BACKGROUNDBruder GE, Stewart JW, McGrath PJ, Deliyannides D, Quitkin FM. Dichotic listening tests of functional brain asymmetry predict response to fluoxetine in depressed women and men. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004 Sep;29(9):1752-61. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300519.
PMID: 15238992BACKGROUNDStewart JW, Quitkin FM, McGrath PJ, Bruder GE. Do tricyclic responders have different brain laterality? J Abnorm Psychol. 1999 Nov;108(4):707-10. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.108.4.707.
PMID: 10609436BACKGROUNDBruder GE, Stewart JW, Voglmaier MM, Harrison WM, McGrath P, Tricamo E, Quitkin FM. Cerebral laterality and depression: relations of perceptual asymmetry to outcome of treatment with tricyclic antidepressants. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1990 Feb;3(1):1-10.
PMID: 2306330BACKGROUNDBruder GE, Sedoruk JP, Stewart JW, McGrath PJ, Quitkin FM, Tenke CE. Electroencephalographic alpha measures predict therapeutic response to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant: pre- and post-treatment findings. Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Jun 15;63(12):1171-7. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.10.009. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
PMID: 18061147DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Open, non-randomized treatment and ratings; small sample size
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jonathan W. Stewart, M.D., Principle Investigator
- Organization
- New York State Psychiatric Institute
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jonathan W. Stewart, MD.
New York State Psychiatric Institute - Columbia University Department of Psychiatry
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Psychiatrist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 24, 2006
First Posted
February 27, 2006
Study Start
April 1, 1994
Primary Completion
June 1, 2011
Study Completion
June 1, 2011
Last Updated
May 30, 2019
Results First Posted
May 15, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05