NCT00292006

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to find out whether computerized tomography will be better than plain radiographs in determining pediatrics scaphoid fractures.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 14, 2006

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 15, 2006

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2007

Completed
Last Updated

August 23, 2017

Status Verified

February 1, 2006

First QC Date

February 14, 2006

Last Update Submit

August 22, 2017

Conditions

Scaphoid BoneFracture

Keywords

clinical scaphoid fracturepediatric

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Fracture diagnosis

Interventions

Computerized tomographyDEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Pain in anatomical snuffbox, Negative radiographs, less than 18 years old, older than 6 years old, injury less than 1 week old and provision of informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous injury to scaphoid bone, other injuries on the same extremity, vascular injury present at the injury site, fracture seen on initial radiographs, injury \>1 week old, inability for patient to comply with rehabilitation or form completion, likely problems in maintaining patient follow-up

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

London Health Sciences Center Victoria Hospital

London, Ontario, N6A 5W9, Canada

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Temple CL, Ross DC, Bennett JD, Garvin GJ, King GJ, Faber KJ. Comparison of sagittal computed tomography and plain film radiography in a scaphoid fracture model. J Hand Surg Am. 2005 May;30(3):534-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.01.001.

    PMID: 15925164BACKGROUND

  • Breederveld RS, Tuinebreijer WE. Investigation of computed tomographic scan concurrent criterion validity in doubtful scaphoid fracture of the wrist. J Trauma. 2004 Oct;57(4):851-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000124278.29127.42.

    PMID: 15514541BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fractures, Bone

Interventions

Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wounds and Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisRadiographic Image EnhancementImage EnhancementPhotographyRadiographyTomography, X-RayTomography

Study Officials

  • Tim P Carey, MD, FRCSC

    Western University, Canada

    STUDY CHAIR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2006

First Posted

February 15, 2006

Study Completion

June 1, 2007

Last Updated

August 23, 2017

Record last verified: 2006-02

Locations

CA(1)