NCT00291499

Brief Summary

The goal of the present study is to investigate the effectiveness of Condrosulf® 800 mg tablets vs. placebo once a day for 6 months in the symptomatic treatment of finger joint osteoarthritis. Primary endpoints of the study are the evaluation of global spontaneous pain (Huskisson's Visual Analogue Scale: VAS) and the score of Dreiser's algo-functional index (FIHOA) during the treatment with the tested product, Condrosulf®, versus placebo.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
163

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2005

Longer than P75 for phase_3

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2005

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 13, 2006

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 14, 2006

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2009

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2010

Completed
10.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 4, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

March 4, 2021

Status Verified

February 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

4.5 years

First QC Date

February 13, 2006

Results QC Date

January 7, 2021

Last Update Submit

February 11, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

symptomatic OA of the hand

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in Global Spontaneous Pain Intensity of Target Hand

    Intensity of global spontaneous pain is evaluated by the patient himself on a Huskisson's visual analogue scale (VAS) of 100 mm. 0=no pain 100=max pain Change calculated as difference between Month 6 value and baseline value target hand is defined as the patient's most symptomatic hand or, when both hands were equally painful, the patient's dominant hand.

    6 months

  • Change in Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis Dreiser's Score (FIHOA) in the Target Hand

    Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (Dreiser's Index). Range 0-30 Patients reported the severity of their symptoms by answering a set of 10 questions. Severity was rated on a numerical scale (0 = possible without difficulty, 1 = possible with slight difficulty, 2 =possible with great difficulty, and 3 = impossible), being 30 points the worst possible pain score. Change calculated as difference between the month 6 value and baseline value Target hand defined as the patient's most symptomatic hand or, when both hands were equally painful, the patient's dominant hand

    6 month

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Investigator Global Evaluation on Efficacy

    6 months

  • Change in Grip Strength

    6 months

  • Change in Morning Stiffness Duration

    6 months

  • Consumption of Paracetamol

    6 months

Study Arms (2)

Chondroitin 4&6 sulfate (Condrosulf)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Chondroitin 4&6 sulfate (Condrosulf)

placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR
Other: Placebo

Interventions

800 mg/day for 6 months

Chondroitin 4&6 sulfate (Condrosulf)
PlaceboOTHER

800 mg placebo/day for 6 months

placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients of either sex
  • Aged 40 and over
  • Outpatients
  • Patients fulfilling the American Congress of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for the reporting of hand OA
  • Patients showing X-ray features of hand OA on at least two joints (2 IP and/or 1 IP and 1 TMC) of the dominant hand on standard plain radiographs (\< 6 month).
  • Showing a FIHOA score \> or = 6.
  • Having had at least two painful flares in a finger joint during the previous 12 month.
  • Patients who have signed the written informed consent for their participation in the study
  • Patients able to understand and follow the protocol.
  • Patients with a satisfying health and nutritional status.

You may not qualify if:

  • Inflammatory joint disease of other origin
  • Septic arthritis
  • Chronic inflammatory joint disease
  • Previous articular fracture of the concerned articulations
  • Use of analgesic therapy for other indications
  • Receiving oral corticosteroids
  • Mono-articular posttraumatic OA of the finger
  • Planning surgery of the hands in the following 6 months
  • Patients suffering or having suffered from secondary osteoarthritis after one of the following diseases:
  • Infectious arthritis - Acromegaly
  • Ochronosis - Hemachromatosis
  • Gout - Wilson's disease
  • Chondrocalcinosis - Paget's disease
  • Osteochondrosis - Mutation of collagen
  • Genetic problems (for ex. hypermobility) - Previous joint fracture
  • +16 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (19)

  • Lequesne M. [Symptomatic slow-action anti-arthritic agents: a new therapeutic concept?]. Rev Rhum Ed Fr. 1994 Feb;61(2):75-9. No abstract available. French.

    PMID: 7920505BACKGROUND
  • Michel BA, Stucki G, Frey D, De Vathaire F, Vignon E, Bruehlmann P, Uebelhart D. Chondroitins 4 and 6 sulfate in osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Mar;52(3):779-86. doi: 10.1002/art.20867.

    PMID: 15751094BACKGROUND
  • Uebelhart D, Malaise M, Marcolongo R, de Vathaire F, Piperno M, Mailleux E, Fioravanti A, Matoso L, Vignon E. Intermittent treatment of knee osteoarthritis with oral chondroitin sulfate: a one-year, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study versus placebo. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004 Apr;12(4):269-76. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2004.01.004.

    PMID: 15023378BACKGROUND
  • Cicuttini FM, Spector TD. Osteoarthritis in the aged. Epidemiological issues and optimal management. Drugs Aging. 1995 May;6(5):409-20. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199506050-00007.

    PMID: 7647428BACKGROUND
  • Howell DS, Altman RD. Cartilage repair and conservation in osteoarthritis. A brief review of some experimental approaches to chondroprotection. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1993 Aug;19(3):713-24.

    PMID: 8210583BACKGROUND
  • Volpi N. Oral bioavailability of chondroitin sulfate (Condrosulf) and its constituents in healthy male volunteers. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2002 Oct;10(10):768-77. doi: 10.1053/joca.2002.0824.

    PMID: 12359162BACKGROUND
  • Conte A, de Bernardi M, Palmieri L, Lualdi P, Mautone G, Ronca G. Metabolic fate of exogenous chondroitin sulfate in man. Arzneimittelforschung. 1991 Jul;41(7):768-72.

    PMID: 1772467BACKGROUND
  • Morreale P, Manopulo R, Galati M, Boccanera L, Saponati G, Bocchi L. Comparison of the antiinflammatory efficacy of chondroitin sulfate and diclofenac sodium in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 1996 Aug;23(8):1385-91.

    PMID: 8856618BACKGROUND
  • Ronca F, Palmieri L, Panicucci P, Ronca G. Anti-inflammatory activity of chondroitin sulfate. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1998 May;6 Suppl A:14-21. doi: 10.1016/s1063-4584(98)80006-x.

    PMID: 9743814BACKGROUND
  • Uebelhart D, Thonar EJ, Zhang J, Williams JM. Protective effect of exogenous chondroitin 4,6-sulfate in the acute degradation of articular cartilage in the rabbit. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1998 May;6 Suppl A:6-13. doi: 10.1016/s1063-4584(98)80005-8.

    PMID: 9743813BACKGROUND
  • Bourgeois P, Chales G, Dehais J, Delcambre B, Kuntz JL, Rozenberg S. Efficacy and tolerability of chondroitin sulfate 1200 mg/day vs chondroitin sulfate 3 x 400 mg/day vs placebo. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1998 May;6 Suppl A:25-30. doi: 10.1016/s1063-4584(98)80008-3.

    PMID: 9743816BACKGROUND
  • Mazieres B, Loyau G, Menkes CJ, Valat JP, Dreiser RL, Charlot J, Masounabe-Puyanne A. [Chondroitin sulfate in the treatment of gonarthrosis and coxarthrosis. 5-months result of a multicenter double-blind controlled prospective study using placebo]. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic. 1992 Jul-Sep;59(7-8):466-72. French.

    PMID: 1485136BACKGROUND
  • Bucsi L, Poor G. Efficacy and tolerability of oral chondroitin sulfate as a symptomatic slow-acting drug for osteoarthritis (SYSADOA) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1998 May;6 Suppl A:31-6. doi: 10.1016/s1063-4584(98)80009-5.

    PMID: 9743817BACKGROUND
  • Uebelhart D, Thonar EJ, Delmas PD, Chantraine A, Vignon E. Effects of oral chondroitin sulfate on the progression of knee osteoarthritis: a pilot study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1998 May;6 Suppl A:39-46. doi: 10.1016/s1063-4584(98)80011-3.

    PMID: 9743819BACKGROUND
  • Verbruggen G, Goemaere S, Veys EM. Chondroitin sulfate: S/DMOAD (structure/disease modifying anti-osteoarthritis drug) in the treatment of finger joint OA. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1998 May;6 Suppl A:37-8. doi: 10.1016/s1063-4584(98)80010-1.

    PMID: 9743818BACKGROUND
  • Verbruggen G, Goemaere S, Veys EM. Systems to assess the progression of finger joint osteoarthritis and the effects of disease modifying osteoarthritis drugs. Clin Rheumatol. 2002 Jun;21(3):231-43. doi: 10.1007/s10067-002-8290-7.

    PMID: 12111630BACKGROUND
  • Dreiser RL, Maheu E, Guillou GB, Caspard H, Grouin JM. Validation of an algofunctional index for osteoarthritis of the hand. Rev Rhum Engl Ed. 1995 Jun;62(6 Suppl 1):43S-53S.

    PMID: 7583182BACKGROUND
  • Altman R, Alarcon G, Appelrouth D, Bloch D, Borenstein D, Brandt K, Brown C, Cooke TD, Daniel W, Gray R, et al. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hand. Arthritis Rheum. 1990 Nov;33(11):1601-10. doi: 10.1002/art.1780331101.

    PMID: 2242058BACKGROUND
  • Gabay C, Medinger-Sadowski C, Gascon D, Kolo F, Finckh A. Symptomatic effects of chondroitin 4 and chondroitin 6 sulfate on hand osteoarthritis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial at a single center. Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Nov;63(11):3383-91. doi: 10.1002/art.30574.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Project Leader
Organization
IBSA Institut biochimique

Study Officials

  • Cem Gabay, Prof. Dr.

    HUG - Hôpitaux universitaires de Genève

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2006

First Posted

February 14, 2006

Study Start

June 1, 2005

Primary Completion

December 1, 2009

Study Completion

August 1, 2010

Last Updated

March 4, 2021

Results First Posted

March 4, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-02