A Comparison of Two Total Hip Replacements: Hip Resurfacing System Versus Mallory-Head/Exeter
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare two total hip replacement systems: Hip Resurfacing System (ReCap) versus Mallory-Head/Exeter.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jan 2005
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 30, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 1, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2012
CompletedDecember 5, 2014
December 1, 2014
6.7 years
June 30, 2005
December 3, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Metal ion release evaluated in urine
three years
Gait pattern evaluated with 3D gait analysis, Vicon Polygon
two years
Bone mineral density (BMD) in surrounding bone of the prosthesis
three years
Prostheses migration evaluated by radiostereometric analysis (RSA)
three years
Proinflammatory- and bone degradation measures in blood samples
three years
Interventions
ReCap total hip arthroplasty inserted according to manufactures manual.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient with primary hip osteoarthrosis (OA).
- Informed patient consent in writing.
- Sufficient bone density to allow uncemented implantation of an acetabular component.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of other metal implants.
- Working exposure of chrome, cobalt or molybdenum.
- Ingestion of multivitamin or medication containing chrome, cobalt or molybdenum.
- Kidney disease
- Hip joint dysplasia
- Patients with neuromuscular or vascular disease in the affected leg.
- Patients who regularly take non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and cannot interrupt intake for the postoperative phase of the study.
- Patients with fracture sequelae.
- Female patients of childbearing capacity.
- Sequelae to previous hip joint disorder in childhood
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Aarhuslead
- Biomet Merck Aps,Horsens, Denmarkcollaborator
- Gigtforeningencollaborator
- Sahva A/S, Borgervænget 5-7, København Ø, Denmarkcollaborator
- Danske Fysioterapeutercollaborator
- Regionshospitalet Silkeborgcollaborator
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Healthcollaborator
- Regionshospitalet Hammel Neurocentercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Orthopaedic Center, Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, Jylland, 8000, Denmark
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kjeld Søballe, MD., Prof.
Orthopaedic Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 30, 2005
First Posted
July 1, 2005
Study Start
January 1, 2005
Primary Completion
September 1, 2011
Study Completion
January 1, 2012
Last Updated
December 5, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-12