Sirolimus Eluting Stenting in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Randomized Study Of Sirolimus Eluting Stent Vs Conventional Stent In Acute Myocardial Infarction Acronym SESAMI
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The incidence of stent restenosis in the setting of primary angioplasty is particularly high, reaching a rate of 27% In the last years the introduction of drug-eluting stents has drastically reduced the incidence of restenosis in patients not requiring urgent revascularization. Whether drug-eluting stenting might constitute the new optimal therapy for patients with an acute myocardial infarction is unknown. To be able to answer this question, we designed a randomized trial in which patients with an acute myocardial infarction eligible for treatment with primary angioplasty and abciximab were randomized to receive either a rapamicine-eluting stent or a conventional bare stent.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Mar 2003
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2003
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 6, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 7, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2006
CompletedFebruary 10, 2006
February 1, 2006
February 6, 2006
February 9, 2006
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary end point for the trial was the binary restonis at one year angiographic follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Secondary end points included a composite of
MACE including death, Q-wave and non-Q-wave infarction, emergent bypass surgery, or repeat TLR at 30 days and 12 months after the index procedure
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Patients were excluded if they were in cardiogenic shock (defined as systolic blood pressure of less than 80 mm Hg for more than 30 minutes or the need for intravenous pressors or intraaortic-balloon counterpulsation); had a history of bleeding diathesis; had a history of leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, or severe hepatic or renal dysfunction; had a noncardiac illness associated with a life expectancy of less than one year; were participating in another study; or were unable to give informed consent owing to prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cardiologia Interventistica Ospedale San Camillo
Roma, Roma, 00100, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Menichelli M, Parma A, Pucci E, Fiorilli R, De Felice F, Nazzaro M, Giulivi A, Alborino D, Azzellino A, Violini R. Randomized trial of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction (SESAMI). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 May 15;49(19):1924-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.081. Epub 2007 Apr 30.
PMID: 17498576DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Roberto Violini, MD
Cardiologia Interventistica Ospedale San Camillo Roma
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maurizio Menichelli, MD
Cardiologia Interventistica Ospedale San Camillo Roma
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 6, 2006
First Posted
February 7, 2006
Study Start
March 1, 2003
Study Completion
March 1, 2006
Last Updated
February 10, 2006
Record last verified: 2006-02