NCT00279591

Brief Summary

A randomized controlled trial compared the clinical outcomes of transported pediatric patients monitored with an oscillometric blood pressure device versus those monitored with a near-continuous, noninvasive blood pressure.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
94

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2006

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 17, 2006

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 19, 2006

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2006

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2007

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2008

Completed
4.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 30, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

April 30, 2012

Status Verified

April 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

January 17, 2006

Results QC Date

March 28, 2011

Last Update Submit

April 3, 2012

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The Difference in Hospital Length of Stay Between Those Who Received Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring and Those Who Received Standard of Care

    This is the total number of participants analyzed for the intervention group and the total number of participants analyzed for the control group and the total number of days that each group was analyzed overall.

    Up to two weeks

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Length of Stay

    Up to two weeks

  • Total Number of Organ Failure Days (Multiple Organ Dysfunction) in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)for the Control Group and Total Number of Organ Failure Days for the Intervention Group. Multiple Organ Dysfunction is Defined as Multiple Organ Failure.

    Up to two weeks

  • Mean Daily Score Using the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28) Scale.

    Up to two weeks

  • Amount of Intravenous Fluid Resuscitation

    At start of inter-facility transport, then every 15 minutes until arrival.

Study Arms (2)

Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients received continuous blood pressure monitoring the entire time they were in med flight to the hospital.

Device: Continuous blood pressure monitoring using (Dinamap) standard oscillometric blood pressure device

Standard of care blood pressure monitoring

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Patients received the normal standard of care for blood pressure monitoring during the course of the med flight to the hospital.

Device: Standard of care blood pressure monitoring

Interventions

Continuous blood pressure monitoring of patients during med flight to hospital

Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring

Patients received the standard of care for blood pressure monitoring while en route to the hospital via med flight.

Standard of care blood pressure monitoring

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Year - 17 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Pediatric patients transported by Angel One to Arkansas Children's Hospital.
  • Age Group: 1 year - 17 years AND
  • Patients at risk of developing SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome), according to the criteria below.
  • i. The presence of at least two of the following four criteria (one of which must be abnormal temperature or leukocyte count): A. Core temperature of \>38.5 C or \<36 C. B. Tachycardia, defined as mean heart rate \>95th percentile for age in absence of external stimulus, chronic drugs, or painful stimuli.
  • C. Mean respiratory rate \>95th percentile for age, or \>10% immature neutrophils.
  • Patients with moderate or severe head trauma, at risk of developing secondary ischemic brain injury, according to the criteria below.
  • i. Glasgow Coma scale \<15 with one or more of the following: A. Mass lesion or cerebral edema on CT or MRI scan. B. Post-Traumatic Seizure. C. Multiple Trauma. D. Focal Neurologic Signs. E. Intubation for control of suspected intracranial hypertension.

You may not qualify if:

  • Wrist circumference less than 11cm (minimum size for the Vasotrac device).
  • Contractures of the wrists, not allowing correct placement of the Vasotrac device.
  • Hematoma(s) located on both wrists from recent redial (\<24hr) artery puncture.
  • Patients likely to proceed to brain death per assessment of the referring physician.
  • Patients being treated for malignant hypertension.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Arkansas Children's Hospital

Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Stroud MH, Prodhan P, Moss M, Fiser R, Schexnayder S, Anand K. Enhanced monitoring improves pediatric transport outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2011 Jan;127(1):42-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1336. Epub 2010 Dec 20.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

InflammationPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsShock

Limitations and Caveats

Small Sample Size. Halted prior to projected enrollment secondary to lack of technical support and supplies for near continuous BP measuring device.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Michael Stroud
Organization
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Study Officials

  • Michael Stroud, MD

    University of Arkansas

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2006

First Posted

January 19, 2006

Study Start

June 1, 2006

Primary Completion

June 1, 2007

Study Completion

January 1, 2008

Last Updated

April 30, 2012

Results First Posted

April 30, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-04

Locations