Innohep® in Elderly Patients With Impaired Renal Function Treated for Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis
Safety Profile of Innohep Versus Subcutaneous Unfractionated Heparin in Elderly Patients With Impaired Renal Function Treated for Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis
1 other identifier
interventional
541
9 countries
9
Brief Summary
The objective of the study is to compare the safety of innohep® and Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) in terms of clinically relevant bleedings in elderly patients with impaired renal function for initial treatment of acute Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT). The primary response criterion is the percentage of patients with clinically relevant bleeding events prior to day 90 +/- 5.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Dec 2005
Typical duration for phase_4
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 13, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 16, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 21, 2010
CompletedMarch 6, 2025
February 1, 2019
2.4 years
January 13, 2006
November 23, 2010
February 21, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Patients With Clinically Relevant Bleeding Events
prior to day 90 +/- 5
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of Patients With Recurrence of Venous Thromboembolism
prior to day 90 +/- 5
Number of Patients With Major Bleeding Events
prior to day 90 +/- 5
Study Arms (2)
innohep®
EXPERIMENTALinnohep® 175 anti-Xa IU/kg once daily
Heparin
ACTIVE COMPARATORHeparin 50 IU /kg followed by a total dose of 400 to 600 IU/kg/day divided into two SC injections daily.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with a symptomatic and objectively confirmed Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) (lower limb deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolus (PE)) with mandatory presences of objectively confirmed and treatment requiring DVT, i.e. symptomatic and objectively confirmed distal DVT or objectively confirmed, symptomatic or asymptomatic proximal DVT (confirmation of DVT should be performed by ultrasonography or venography within 48 hous prior to randomisation)
- Patients with an indication for DVT treatment with SC Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) or Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) followed by Oral Anticoagulant (OAC) for at least 90 days
- Hospitalized patients who, during SC anticoagulant treatment, will be followed, as specified in the protocol, on a daily basis either in the hospital or in an out-patient setting
- Patients at or above 75 years with a creatinine clearance less than or equal to 60 mL/min calculated according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula
- Patients at or above 70 years with a creatinine clearance less than or equal to 30 mL/min calculated according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula
You may not qualify if:
- Patients receiving high dose (i.e. equivalent to a dose recommended for treatment of DVT) of UFH or LMWH or thrombolytic agents within the last 4 weeks except for UFH/LMWH during the last 36 hours prior to randomisation
- Patients on oral anticoagulant treatment (vitamin K-antagonists) at or within last 1 week prior to randomisation
- Patients with a symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) requiring thrombolytic therapy or invasive intervention
- End stage renal disease patients requiring dialysis
- Surgery within 2 weeks prior to randomisation or planned surgery, epidural anaesthesia and/or spinal anaesthesia during the SC anticoagulant treatment period
- Planned use of acetylsalicylic acid in doses above 300 mg/day, NSAID or Dextran 40 at randomisation and during the SC anticoagulant treatment period
- Patients with a current overt bleeding or known haemorrhage condition (e.g. active G.I. ulcer)
- Patients with a platelet count \< 100 x 10 9/L
- Patients with a known history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
- Patients with known severe hepatic insufficiency manifested as international normalized ratio (INR) greater than or equal to 1.5
- Patients with uncontrolled severe hypertension i.e. a systolic blood pressure \> 220 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure \> 120 mm Hg during at least 2 measurements within 24 hours prior to randomisation
- Patients with ischaemic stroke at or within last 1 week prior to randomisation
- Patients with a known haemorrhagic stroke within 3 months prior to randomisation
- Patients with known bacterial endocarditis within 3 months prior to randomisation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- LEO Pharmalead
Study Sites (9)
Bulgaria - managed by CRO
Sofia, Bulgaria
Croatia - managed by CRO
Zagreb, Croatia
Czech Republic - managed by CRO
Prague, Czechia
Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche
Brest, 29609, France
Med. Klinik IV/Klinikum Darmstadt
Darmstadt, 64297, Germany
Klinika Chirugii Naczyniowej
Szczecin, 70-111, Poland
Romania - managed by CRO
Bucharest, 010965, Romania
Clinical Center Serbia, Institute of Cardiovascular diseases & Centre for Vascular Surgery-Belgrade
Belgrade, 11000, Serbia
Service of Geriatry, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos
Madrid, 28040, Spain
Related Publications (1)
Leizorovicz A, Siguret V, Mottier D; Innohep(R) in Renal Insufficiency Study Steering Committee; Leizorovicz A, Siguret V, Mottier D, Clonier F, Janas M, Stinson J, Townshend G, Maddalena M. Safety profile of tinzaparin versus subcutaneous unfractionated heparin in elderly patients with impaired renal function treated for acute deep vein thrombosis: the Innohep(R) in Renal Insufficiency Study (IRIS). Thromb Res. 2011 Jul;128(1):27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
PMID: 21477846DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Torsten Skov, Senior Medical Advisor
- Organization
- Leo Pharma
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alain Leizorovicz, MD
Faculté de Médecine Laënnec
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 13, 2006
First Posted
January 16, 2006
Study Start
December 1, 2005
Primary Completion
May 1, 2008
Study Completion
July 1, 2008
Last Updated
March 6, 2025
Results First Posted
December 21, 2010
Record last verified: 2019-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share