A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Golimumab in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis That Are Methotrexate-naive
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlledTrial of Golimumab, a Fully Human Anti-TNFa MonoclonalAntibody, Administered Subcutaneously, in Methotrexate-naive Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
3 other identifiers
interventional
637
20 countries
73
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of golimumab, alone or in combination with methotrexate, as compared to methotrexate alone in rheumatoid arthritis subjects who have not been previously treated with methotrexate.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 rheumatoid-arthritis
Started Dec 2005
Longer than P75 for phase_3 rheumatoid-arthritis
73 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 11, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 13, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 13, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2012
CompletedSeptember 5, 2014
August 1, 2014
2.3 years
December 11, 2005
May 21, 2009
August 27, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Week 24
ACR 50 response is defined as a greater than or equal to 50 percent improvement from baseline in: 1. Swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) 2. greater than or equal to 50 percentage improvement in 3 of the following 5 assessments: a. Patient's assessment of pain by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (0-10 cm) b.Patient's Global Assessment of Disease activity VAS (0-10 cm) c. Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (0-10 cm) d. Patient's assessment of physical function as measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) e. C reactive protein.
Week 24
Change From Baseline in Total Van Der Heijde Modified Sharp (vdH-S) Score at Week 52
The vdH-S score is the sum of the joint erosion score and the joint-space narrowing (JSN) score. The total score ranges from 0 (best) to 448 (worst) with higher scores indicating more joint damage.
Baseline and Week 52
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Number of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24
Week 24
Number of Patients With Abnormal Baseline C-reactive Protein (CRP) Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Week 24
Week 24
Change From Baseline in Total Van Der Heijde Modified Sharp (vdH-S) Score at Week 52 in Patients With Abnormal C-reactive Protein (CRP Greater Than 1.0 mg/dL) at Baseline
Baseline and Week 52
Study Arms (4)
Group 1: Placebo + Methotrexate
EXPERIMENTALPlacebo subcutaneous injections (SC) every 4 weeks from Week 0 for up to 5 years (unless early escape at week 28); Methotrexate - 10 to 20 mg weekly from Week 0 for up to 5 years; Golimumab - if early escape, 50 mg SC injections every 4 weeks from Week 28 up to 5 years; Golimumab - Dr's discretion after unblinding (in participants receiving methotrexate plus placebo), 50 mg SC injections every 4 weeks up to 5 years; Golimumab- Dr's discretion after unblinding, dose adjusted from 50 to 100 mg and from 100 to 50mg. Duration of the blinded period will be until the week-52 database lock.
Group 2: Golimumab 100 mg + Placebo
EXPERIMENTALGolimumab 100 mg SC injections every 4 weeks from Week 0 for up to 5 years; placebo capsules weekly from Week 0 for up to 5 years (unless early escape at Week 28); Methotrexate - if early escape, 10 to 20 mg weekly from Week 28 up to 5 years; Methotrexate - Dr's discretion after unblinding (in participants receiving golimumab plus placebo) 10 to 20 mg weekly for up to 5 years; Golimumab - Dr's discretion after unblinding, dose adjusted from 100 to 50mg. Duration of the blinded period will be until the week-52 database lock.
Group 3: Golimumab 50 mg + Methotrexate
EXPERIMENTALGolimumab 50 mg SC injections every 4 weeks from Week 0 for up to 5 years (unless early escape at week 28); Methotrexate - 10 to 20 mg weekly from Week 0 for up to 5 years; Golimumab - if early escape, 100 mg SC injections every 4 weeks from Week 28 for up to 5 yrs; Golimumab - Dr's discretion after unblinding, dose adjusted from 50 to 100 mg and from 100 to 50mg. Duration of the blinded period will be until the week-52 database lock.
Group 4: Golimumab 100 mg + Methotrexate
EXPERIMENTALGolimumab 100 mg SC injections every 4 weeks from Week 0 for up to 5 years; Methotrexate - 10 to 20 mg weekly from Week 0 for up to 5 years; Golimumab - Dr's discretion after unblinding, dose adjusted from 100 to 50mg. Duration of the blinded period will be until the week-52 database lock.
Interventions
Placebo capsules will be filled with microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel PH 102).
Methotrexate capsules will be filled with microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel PH 102) and a 2.5 mg methotrexate tablet.
SC injections
SC injections
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Have a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (according to the revised 1987 criteria of the ACR) for at least 3 months prior to first administration of study agent
- Are methotrexate (MTX)-naĂ¯ve (ie, have not received more than 3 weekly doses of MTX for RA at any time)
- Have active RA as defined by persistent disease activity with at least 4 swollen and 4 tender joints, at the time of screening and baseline, and at least 2 of the following 4 criteria: a) C-reactive protein (CRP) \>=1.5 mg/dL at screening or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) by Westergren method of \>= 28 mm in the first hour at screening or baseline, b)Morning stiffness of \>= 30 minutes at screening and baseline, c)Bone erosion by x-ray and/or MRI prior to first administration of study agent, d)Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibody-positive or rheumatoid factor (RF) positive at screening
- If using oral corticosteroids, must be on a stable dose equivalent to \<= 10 mg of prednisone/day for at least 2 weeks prior to first administration of study agent.
You may not qualify if:
- Can not have inflammatory diseases other than RA that might confound the evaluation of the benefit of golimumab therapy
- No treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)/systemic immunosuppressives during the 4 weeks prior to the first administration of study agent
- No prior treatment with biologic anti-TNF drugs (infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab)
- No history of, or ongoing, chronic or recurrent infectious disease
- No serious infection within 2 months prior to first administration of study agent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Centocor, Inc.lead
- Schering-Ploughcollaborator
Study Sites (75)
Unknown Facility
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Mobile, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Upland, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, United States
Unknown Facility
Moline, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Springfield, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Witchita, Kansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
Unknown Facility
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Dallas, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Fort Worth, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Lubbock, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Unknown Facility
CĂ³rdoba, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Rosario, Argentina
Unknown Facility
S.M. de Tucuman, Argentina
Unknown Facility
San Miguel de TucumĂ¡n, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Maroochydore, Australia
Unknown Facility
Melbourne, Australia
Unknown Facility
Vienna, Austria
Unknown Facility
Brussels, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Liège, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Unknown Facility
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
Unknown Facility
Rancagua, Chile
Unknown Facility
Santiago, Chile
Unknown Facility
Budapest, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Gyula, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Szombathely, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Bangalore, India
Unknown Facility
Lucknow Gpo, India
Unknown Facility
Secunderabad, India
Unknown Facility
Precinct 7, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Saemban, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Selayang Baru Utara, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Auckland, New Zealand
Unknown Facility
Timaru, New Zealand
Unknown Facility
Cebu, Philippines
Unknown Facility
Manila, Philippines
Unknown Facility
Quezon, Philippines
Unknown Facility
Bialystok, Poland
Unknown Facility
Elblag, Poland
Unknown Facility
Kalisz, Poland
Unknown Facility
Szczecin, Poland
Unknown Facility
Warsaw, Poland
Unknown Facility
Moscow, Russia
Unknown Facility
Saratov, Russia
Unknown Facility
Yaroslavl, Russia
Unknown Facility
Singapore, Singapore
Unknown Facility
Daejeon, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Incheon, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Seoul, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Suwon, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Madrid, Spain
Unknown Facility
Santander, Spain
Unknown Facility
Seville, Spain
Unknown Facility
Valencia, Spain
Unknown Facility
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Taichung, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Taipei, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Tiachung, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Bangkok, Thailand
Unknown Facility
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Unknown Facility
Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Donetsk, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Kharkiv, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Kiev, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Leeds, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
London, United Kingdom
Related Publications (5)
Kay J, Fleischmann R, Keystone E, Hsia EC, Hsu B, Zhou Y, Goldstein N, Braun J. Five-year Safety Data from 5 Clinical Trials of Subcutaneous Golimumab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Ankylosing Spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 2016 Dec;43(12):2120-2130. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.160420. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
PMID: 27803138DERIVEDBaker JF, Conaghan PG, Emery P, Baker DG, Ostergaard M. Relationship of patient-reported outcomes with MRI measures in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Mar;76(3):486-490. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209463. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
PMID: 27432355DERIVEDEmery P, Fleischmann RM, Hsia EC, Xu S, Zhou Y, Baker D. Efficacy of golimumab plus methotrexate in methotrexate-naive patients with severe active rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Sep;33(9):1239-46. doi: 10.1007/s10067-014-2731-y. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
PMID: 25005327DERIVEDEmery P, Fleischmann RM, Doyle MK, Strusberg I, Durez P, Nash P, Amante E, Churchill M, Park W, Pons-Estel B, Xu W, Xu S, Wu Z, Hsia EC. Golimumab, a human anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody, injected subcutaneously every 4 weeks in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who had never taken methotrexate: 1-year and 2-year clinical, radiologic, and physical function findings of a phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Nov;65(11):1732-42. doi: 10.1002/acr.22072.
PMID: 23861303DERIVEDOstergaard M, Emery P, Conaghan PG, Fleischmann R, Hsia EC, Xu W, Rahman MU. Significant improvement in synovitis, osteitis, and bone erosion following golimumab and methotrexate combination therapy as compared with methotrexate alone: a magnetic resonance imaging study of 318 methotrexate-naive rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Dec;63(12):3712-22. doi: 10.1002/art.30592.
PMID: 22127693DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The count of patients with any nonserious adverse events (NAE) excludes patients who only had NAE that occurred in less than or equal to 5% of patients. This information may vary from existing approved labeling and publications.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director Clinical Research
- Organization
- Centocor Research & Development, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Centocor, Inc. Clinical Trial
Centocor, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 11, 2005
First Posted
December 13, 2005
Study Start
December 1, 2005
Primary Completion
April 1, 2008
Study Completion
June 1, 2012
Last Updated
September 5, 2014
Results First Posted
July 13, 2009
Record last verified: 2014-08