NCT00260949

Brief Summary

There are two ways in which surgeons repair rotator cuff tears. An open method involves making an incision (cut) 5-6 inches in length in the skin and repairing the tear with the skin open, while the arthroscopic method involves making small holes in the skin and using a guiding camera and special equipment to repair the tear. This clinical study is being conducted to study the rate of re-tear (one year following surgery) of rotator cuffs that have been repaired using the arthroscopic technique.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
67

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2004

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2004

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 30, 2005

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 2, 2005

Completed
5.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2011

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

July 2, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

6.8 years

First QC Date

November 30, 2005

Last Update Submit

June 27, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

rotator cuff teararthroscopic repair

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Rate of re-tear at 1 year

    The rate of rotator cuff re-tear will be measured 1-year post-operatively using a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Arthrogram.

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Functional Status Anatomical integrity

    1 year

Interventions

Patients will undergo arthroscopic shoulder surgery in the standard fashion

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients will be screened by participating surgeons in a fellowship-run outpatient shoulder clinic. Patients who have consented and are scheduled to undergo an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, and who have a cuff tear size of \<5 cm, and involving 2 or fewer tendons, and meet the additional eligibility criteria will be approached to join the study.

You may qualify if:

  • \. Diagnosis of rotator cuff tear which will involve one of the following:1) history of shoulder pain or weakness 2) ability to illicit pain or weakness with one of the following signs: tenderness of the rotator cuff insertion, palpable crepitus of the subacromial bursa or a palpable defect of the cuff insertion, impingement signs and weakness of the rotator cuff musculature 3) radiological evidence of rotator cuff tear from ultrasound, arthrogram or MRI. Failed non-operative treatment. Size of tear of less than 5 cm and involving 2 or fewer tendons

You may not qualify if:

  • Clinical:1. Tear as defined by significant muscular wasting, inability to actively forward-flex (strength grade 2/5 or worse), positive drop sign or hornblowers 2. Significant tenderness of acromioclavicular or sternoclavicular joints on affected side3. Presence of comorbid shoulder instability or evidence of SLAP lesion4. Previous surgery on affected shoulderRadiological:1. Bony abnormality on standardized series of x-rays consisting of a minimum of an antero-posterior view, lateral \&#8220;Y\&#8221; view in the scapular plane, and an axillary view.2. Presence of massive cuff tear on MRI or ultrasound (defined as \&gt; 5 cm or greater than 2 tendons torn).Arthroscopic:1. Presence of massive cuff tear as defined above on arthroscopic examination of the joint 2. Presence of comorbid conditions: Bankart lesion, SLAP lesion3. Inability to complete the repair arthroscopically (eg. partial repair by marginal convergence without direct repair to bone)Other:Patients who have any contraindication to MRI (including claustrophobia, intracranial aneurism clip, cardiac pacemaker, middle ear prosthesis, metallic heart valve prosthesis, prior metal fragment in eye (intraocular lens implant) etc.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y4E9, Canada

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Lapner PC, Su Y, Simon D, El-Fatori S, Lopez-Vidriero E. Does the upward migration index predict function and quality of life in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Nov;468(11):3063-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1457-7. Epub 2010 Jul 7.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RuptureWounds and InjuriesShoulder InjuriesTendon Injuries

Study Officials

  • Peter Lapner

    OHRI

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2005

First Posted

December 2, 2005

Study Start

November 1, 2004

Primary Completion

August 1, 2011

Study Completion

September 1, 2011

Last Updated

July 2, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Locations