Diabetic Retinopathy Candesartan Trials
DIRECT
Effects of Candesartan Cilexetil (Candesartan) on Diabetic Retinopathy in Type 1 Diabetic Patients Without Retinopathy.
3 other identifiers
interventional
5,238
2 countries
3
Brief Summary
The primary objective is to determine whether candesartan, compared to placebo reduces the incidence of diabetic retinopathy in normotensive, normoalbuminuric type 1 diabetic patients without retinopathy. The secondary objective is to determine whether candesartan, compared to placebo, beneficially influences the rate of change in urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER). This study is part of the DIRECT Programme also including secondary prevention studies of diabetic retinopathy in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The primary objective for all three pooled studies is to determine whether candesartan, compared to placebo, reduces the incidence of microalbuminuria in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Jun 2001
Longer than P75 for phase_3
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2001
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 10, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 15, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 13, 2012
CompletedMay 14, 2014
April 1, 2014
6.8 years
November 10, 2005
March 31, 2009
May 9, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With a 2-step or Greater Increase in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Severity Scale.
Two steps were defined as either a 1-step change in each eye or as a 2-step change in one eye only. ETDRS is a scale with 11 steps (1-11, where a score of 1 represents no retinopathy and a score of 11 represents proliferative retinopathy). A generalized log-rank test was used to test difference between treatments.
From baseline to end of study, i.e. 5 years, with visits after a half year, one year and thereafter one visit per year.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Rate of Change in Urinary Albumin Excretion Rate (UAER).
From baseline to end of study, i.e. 5 years.
Study Arms (2)
1
NO INTERVENTIONPlacebo
2
EXPERIMENTALcandesartan cilexetil
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Type 1 diabetes diagnosed before age of 36 years and in need for continuous insulin treatment within 1 year of diagnosis of diabetes are included.
- Duration of diabetes for \> 1 year and \< 15 years with stable diabetic therapy within last 6 months.
- Patients with untreated resting mean sitting SBP \< 130 mmHg, mean sitting DBP \< 85 mmHg and with retinal photograph grading level 10/10 (on ETDRS severity scale).
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with the following conditions are excluded from participation in the study:
- Cataract or media opacity of a degree which precludes taking gradable retinal photographs
- Angle closure glaucoma, which precludes pharmacological dilatation of the pupil
- History of retinopathy
- History or presence of clinical significant macular oedema (CSME)
- History or evidence of photocoagulation of the retina Other retinal conditions which may mask assessment, eg, retinal vein occlusion
- Positive micral dipstick test
- Presence of secondary diabetes
- Pregnant or lactating women or women of child bearing potential not practicing an adequate method of contraception
- Need of treatment with ACE-inhibitor
- Haemodynamically significant aortic or mitral valve stenosis
- Known renal artery stenosis or kidney transplantation
- Hypersensitivity to study drug
- Severe concomitant disease which may interfere with the assessment of the patient, eg, malignancy, as judged by the investigator
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- AstraZenecalead
- Takedacollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Research Site
Herston, Australia
Research Site
Perth, Australia
Research Site
Odense, Denmark
Related Publications (5)
Natale P, Palmer SC, Navaneethan SD, Craig JC, Strippoli GF. Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for preventing the progression of diabetic kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 29;4(4):CD006257. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006257.pub2.
PMID: 38682786DERIVEDSjolie AK, Klein R, Porta M, Orchard T, Fuller J, Parving HH, Bilous R, Aldington S, Chaturvedi N. Retinal microaneurysm count predicts progression and regression of diabetic retinopathy. Post-hoc results from the DIRECT Programme. Diabet Med. 2011 Mar;28(3):345-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03210.x.
PMID: 21309844DERIVEDPorta M, Hainer JW, Jansson SO, Malm A, Bilous R, Chaturvedi N, Fuller JH, Klein R, Orchard T, Parving HH, Sjolie AK; DIRECT Study Group. Exposure to candesartan during the first trimester of pregnancy in type 1 diabetes: experience from the placebo-controlled DIabetic REtinopathy Candesartan Trials. Diabetologia. 2011 Jun;54(6):1298-303. doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-2040-1. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
PMID: 21225239DERIVEDBilous R, Chaturvedi N, Sjolie AK, Fuller J, Klein R, Orchard T, Porta M, Parving HH. Effect of candesartan on microalbuminuria and albumin excretion rate in diabetes: three randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jul 7;151(1):11-20, W3-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-1-200907070-00120. Epub 2009 May 18.
PMID: 19451554DERIVEDChaturvedi N, Porta M, Klein R, Orchard T, Fuller J, Parving HH, Bilous R, Sjolie AK; DIRECT Programme Study Group. Effect of candesartan on prevention (DIRECT-Prevent 1) and progression (DIRECT-Protect 1) of retinopathy in type 1 diabetes: randomised, placebo-controlled trials. Lancet. 2008 Oct 18;372(9647):1394-402. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61412-9. Epub 2008 Sep 25.
PMID: 18823656DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Niklas Berglind, GPS Atacand
- Organization
- AstraZeneca
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
AstraZeneca Atacand Medical Science Director, MD
AstraZeneca
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 10, 2005
First Posted
November 15, 2005
Study Start
June 1, 2001
Primary Completion
April 1, 2008
Study Completion
April 1, 2008
Last Updated
May 14, 2014
Results First Posted
April 13, 2012
Record last verified: 2014-04