Study Comparing Effectiveness of Intraperitoneal Insulin Administration to Subcutaneous Insulin Administration
MIP310
A Randomized, Active Control, Multi-Center Study Comparing the Effect of Intraperitoneal Insulin Administration to Subcutaneous Insulin Administration on Glycemic Control and the Frequency of Severe Hypoglycemia
1 other identifier
interventional
107
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of insulin delivered in the peritoneum (abdomen)by an implantable pump in Type 1 diabetics.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Jun 2002
Longer than P75 for phase_3
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2002
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 21, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 23, 2011
CompletedSeptember 21, 2011
August 1, 2011
2.2 years
September 13, 2005
April 25, 2011
September 19, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in HbA1c and Compared Between Groups
To determine whether Intra Peritoneal insulin delivery via MIP results in glycemic control that is equal to or superior (i.e. not inferior to) control with SC therapy (Ho : μ (IP) -μ (SC) ≥ 0.50% A1C), a repeated measures analysis of variance, adjusting for baseline A1C using SAS Proc Mixed was used to compare average A1C trends over time between the two treatment groups (19). Type 3 Least Square (LS) means for each group were assessed. The Estimate statement within SAS proc mixed was used to estimate contrasts among the LS means and confidence intervals for the contrasts.
Baseline and 12 months
Incidence of Severe Hypoglycemia Events
The total number of severe hypoglycemia events, defined as a clinical episode of hypoglycemia (resulting in seizure or coma, requiring hospitalization, intravenous glucose or glucagon administration), or any hypoglycemia that requires assistance from another person, compared between the two study arms from Baseline to 12 months.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Average Daily Blood Glucose
average from baseline to 12 months
Mean Amplitude of Glycemic Excursions (MAGE)
average from baseline to 12 months
Low Blood Glucose Index (LBGI);
average from baseline to 12 months
Study Arms (2)
MiniMed Implantable insulin Pump (MIP)
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental group will receive intraperitoneally (IP) delivered insulin via the Medtronic MiniMed Implantable Pump (MIP). At the time of implant, the pump will be filled with Aventis HOE21PH U400 insulin and the subject will be treated with this insulin for the first 180 days post implant. During the refill procedure performed 180 days post implant, any insulin remaining in the pump will be removed and the pump will be refilled with Medtronic MiniMed Implantable Pump Human Recombinant Insulin.
Subcutaneous insulin arm (SC)
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group will remain on their current pre-study subcutaneous insulin therapy of either Multiple Daily Injections (MDI) or Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII - external insulin pump). The SC group will not be restricted to the type of insulin used, or be required to change or modify their current diabetes therapy for the purpose of the study.
Interventions
400 IU per ml - dosage based on the Investigators clinical judgement and the individual subject requirements.
The implantable pump system is intended to provide continuous intraperitoneal delivery of insulin in subjects with diabetes.
400 IU per ml - dosage based on the Investigators clinical judgement and the individual subject requirements.
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- The subject's insulin usage exceeds 66 units per day.
- Severe complications such as advanced autonomic neuropathy, legal blindness, or symptomatic cardiovascular disease as evidenced by a cardiovascular episode within the last six months
- Reside at or plan to travel to elevations above 8000 feet during the study period (commercial airline travel is acceptable)
- Subject who is pregnant, of childbearing potential or lactating and is neither surgically sterile, using contraceptives (devices, oral or implanted) nor other physician approved contraceptive
- The subject has any major concomitant disease or any physical or psychological disorder within the last five years, which might be considered life threatening, or which might confound the collection or interpretation of the study data
- The subject has previously enrolled in or participated in an investigational drug or device study within the preceding 4 weeks
- The subject has any condition that precludes him/her from completing the study requirements
- Has plans for activities which require them to go 25 feet below sea level
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Sansum Medical Research Institute
Santa Barbara, California, 93105, United States
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center
Aurora, Colorado, 80010, United States
Hellman & Rosen Endocrine Associates
North Kansas City, Missouri, 64116, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Wooser, Ohio, 44195, United States
Diabetes & Glandular Disease Clinic
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- John Shin
- Organization
- Sr. Clinical Research Manager
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Scott W Lee, MD
Medtronic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2005
First Posted
September 21, 2005
Study Start
June 1, 2002
Primary Completion
August 1, 2004
Study Completion
September 1, 2008
Last Updated
September 21, 2011
Results First Posted
June 23, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-08