The SOS (Stenting Of Saphenous Vein Grafts) Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
80
2 countries
5
Brief Summary
The main purpose of this study is to determine whether implantation of a paclitaxel-eluting stent (Taxus™) in saphenous vein graft lesions will reduce the incidence of in-stent restenosis after 12 months when compared to a similar bare metal stent.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started May 2005
Longer than P75 for phase_3
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 31, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 1, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2011
CompletedApril 26, 2012
April 1, 2012
3.4 years
October 31, 2005
April 25, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
binary angiographic in-stent restenosis, as assessed by 12-month follow-up quantitative coronary angiography
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
intrastent intimal hyperplasia accumulation as measured by IVUS
12 months for IVUS and 24 months for clinical follow-up
incidence of ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization, target vessel failure, and overall major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 24-month follow-up
12 months for IVUS and 24 months for clinical follow-up
Study Arms (2)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORExpress 2 bare metal stent
2
EXPERIMENTALTaxus, paclitaxel-eluting stent
Interventions
Two different types of stents (paclitaxel-eluting and a similar bare metal stent) are being compared in saphenous vein graft lesions.
Two different types of stents (paclitaxel-eluting and a similar bare metal stent) are being compared in saphenous vein graft lesions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- at least one 50-99% de-novo or restenotic lesion in a saphenous vein graft that is between 2.5 and 4.0 mm in diameter, requiring percutaneous coronary intervention according to the opinion of the attending cardiologist
- willing to return for repeat coronary angiography after 12 months
- able to give informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- previous or planned use of intravascular brachytherapy in the target vessel
- a left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 25 percent
- hemorrhagic diatheses
- contraindications or allergy to aspirin, thienopyridines, paclitaxel, or stainless steel
- a history of anaphylaxis in response to iodinated contrast medium
- use of paclitaxel within 12 months before study entry or current use of colchicine
- a serum creatinine level of more than 2.0 mg per deciliter (177 µmol per liter)
- a leukocyte count of less than 3500 per cubic millimeter, or a platelet count of less than 100,000 per cubic millimeter
- a recent positive pregnancy test, breast-feeding, or the possibility of a future pregnancy
- coexisting conditions that limit life expectancy to less than 24 months or that could affect a patient's compliance with the protocol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- North Texas Veterans Healthcare Systemlead
- Clark R. Gregg Fund, Harris Methodist Foundationcollaborator
- University of Arkansascollaborator
- US Department of Veterans Affairscollaborator
- Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Centercollaborator
- Southern Arizona VA Health Care Systemcollaborator
- Onassis Cardiac Surgery Centrecollaborator
Study Sites (5)
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205, United States
VA Iowa City Healthcare system
Iowa City, Iowa, 52246, United States
VA North Texas Health Care System
Dallas, Texas, 75216, United States
Michael E. Debakey VA Medical Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center
Athens, 17674, Greece
Related Publications (6)
Brilakis ES, Lichtenwalter C, de Lemos JA, Roesle M, Obel O, Haagen D, Saeed B, Gadiparthi C, Bissett JK, Sachdeva R, Voudris VV, Karyofillis P, Kar B, Rossen J, Fasseas P, Berger P, Banerjee S. A randomized controlled trial of a paclitaxel-eluting stent versus a similar bare-metal stent in saphenous vein graft lesions the SOS (Stenting of Saphenous Vein Grafts) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Mar 17;53(11):919-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.11.029.
PMID: 19281920RESULTLichtenwalter C, de Lemos JA, Roesle M, Obel O, Holper EM, Haagen D, Saeed B, Iturbe JM, Shunk K, Bissett JK, Sachdeva R, Voudris VV, Karyofillis P, Kar B, Rossen J, Fasseas P, Berger P, Banerjee S, Brilakis ES. Clinical presentation and angiographic characteristics of saphenous vein graft failure after stenting: insights from the SOS (stenting of saphenous vein grafts) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Sep;2(9):855-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.06.014.
PMID: 19778774RESULTMichael TT, Abdel-karim AR, Papayannis A, Lichtenwalter C, de Lemos JA, Obel O, Addo T, Roesle M, Haagen D, Rangan BV, Saeed B, Bissett JK, Sachdeva R, Voudris VV, Karyofillis P, Kar B, Rossen J, Fasseas P, Berger PB, Banerjee S, Brilakis ES. Recurrent cardiovascular events with paclitaxel-eluting versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein graft lesions: insights from the SOS (Stenting of Saphenous Vein Grafts) trial. J Invasive Cardiol. 2011 Jun;23(6):216-9.
PMID: 21646644RESULTBrilakis ES, Lichtenwalter C, Abdel-karim AR, de Lemos JA, Obel O, Addo T, Roesle M, Haagen D, Rangan BV, Saeed B, Bissett JK, Sachdeva R, Voudris VV, Karyofillis P, Kar B, Rossen J, Fasseas P, Berger P, Banerjee S. Continued benefit from paclitaxel-eluting compared with bare-metal stent implantation in saphenous vein graft lesions during long-term follow-up of the SOS (Stenting of Saphenous Vein Grafts) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Feb;4(2):176-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.10.003.
PMID: 21349456RESULTMichael TT, Badhey N, Banerjee S, Brilakis ES. Comparison of characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing saphenous vein graft stenting who were or were not enrolled in the stenting of saphenous vein grafts randomized controlled trial. J Investig Med. 2011 Feb;59(2):259-66. doi: 10.231/JIM.0b013e318207066c.
PMID: 21200334RESULTBadhey N, Lichtenwalter C, de Lemos JA, Roesle M, Obel O, Addo TA, Haagen D, Abdel-Karim AR, Saeed B, Bissett JK, Sachdeva R, Voudris VV, Karyofillis P, Kar B, Rossen J, Fasseas P, Berger PB, Banerjee S, Brilakis ES. Contemporary use of embolic protection devices in saphenous vein graft interventions: Insights from the stenting of saphenous vein grafts trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Aug 1;76(2):263-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22438.
PMID: 20665875RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Emmanouil S Brilakis, MD, PhD
VA North Texas Health Care System, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories, VA North Texas Healthcare System
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 31, 2005
First Posted
November 1, 2005
Study Start
May 1, 2005
Primary Completion
October 1, 2008
Study Completion
June 1, 2011
Last Updated
April 26, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-04