The Efficacy of Active Conservative Treatment for Patients With Severe Sciatica. A Randomized Clinical Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
181
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This Study si designed as a Prospective clinical controlled randomized trial. Background: Reviews have demonstrated no or little efficacy for passive conservative treatment modalities for patients suffering from sciatica. The results of surgery are conflicting. Cohort studies have shown a high efficacy for active treatment modalities in patients with sciatica. The current trend in treatment of low back pain without sciatica is focusing on active conservative treatment like information and advice to stay active and exercises. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of two active conservative treatment programs for patients with severe sciatica. Methods: In a prospective clinical controlled randomized trial, 181 consecutive patients with radicular pain below the knee were examined at baseline, 8 weeks later at post treatment follow-up, and at one year follow-up and MR-scanned at baseline and one year follow-up. The treatment consisted of four elements: 1-3 were identical in both groups. 1. Thorough information concerning anatomy, pathogenesis, how discs heal without surgery, and encouragement to stay as active as possible but to reduce activity if an increase in leg pain occurs. 2." Tender love and care". 3. Medication; this was optional and only weak analgesic and NSAIDs were recommended. Element 4 consisted of two different exercise programs. Symptom guided exercises consisted of a variety of back related exercises and optional manual treatment. The exercises were given after an algorithm, where different symptoms or a response to exercises determined the exercises given. The other group, Sham exercises had voluntary not back related exercises. The exercises were aimed at increasing the general blood circulation and maintaining strength in the extremities. Outcome measures were functional status, pain, MRI findings, clinical findings, and history
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2001
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2001
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2003
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 31, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 1, 2005
CompletedOctober 17, 2008
October 1, 2005
October 31, 2005
October 16, 2008
Conditions
Keywords
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Radicular pain of dermatonal nature in one or both legs or below the knee Leg pain \> 3 on the eleven point box scale20 Radiating pain duration between two weeks and one year Age between 18 to 65 years
You may not qualify if:
- \- Cauda equine syndrome Not having Danish as first language Pending workers litigation claims Inability to follow the rehabilitation protocol, due to concomitant disease Previous back surgery Spinal tumors Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Back Research Center
Ringe, 5750, Denmark
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hanne B Albert, Ph.D.
The Back Research Center, Funen
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 31, 2005
First Posted
November 1, 2005
Study Start
November 1, 2001
Study Completion
August 1, 2003
Last Updated
October 17, 2008
Record last verified: 2005-10