Pyridoxine in Preventing Hand-Foot Syndrome in Patients Who Are Receiving Liposomal Doxorubicin for Cancer
A Double-Blind Randomized Trial of Pyridoxine Versus Placebo for the Prevention of Doxil-Related Palmar-Plantar Erythrodysesthesia (Hand-Foot Syndrome)
2 other identifiers
interventional
34
1 country
8
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Pyridoxine (vitamin B6) may prevent or lessen hand-foot syndrome caused by chemotherapy. It is not yet known whether pyridoxine is more effective than a placebo in preventing hand-foot syndrome. PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying pyridoxine to see how well it works compared to a placebo in preventing hand-foot syndrome in patients who are receiving liposomal doxorubicin for recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer, metastatic breast cancer, or advanced endometrial cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3 breast-cancer
Started Apr 2004
Typical duration for phase_3 breast-cancer
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 25, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 27, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 22, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2011
CompletedDecember 30, 2011
December 1, 2011
4 years
October 25, 2005
October 26, 2010
December 28, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Palmar-plantar Erythrodysesthesia (PPE)
Patients were monitored weekly with phone calls from the research nurse and monthly at clinic visits for overall (including pyridoxine) and specific doxorubicin HCl liposome related toxicities using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 3.0.
Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for up to 6 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G)
After Cycle 3 of chemotherapy (on average at 3 months)
Study Arms (2)
Pyridoxine
EXPERIMENTALArm I: Patients receive doxorubicin HCl liposome IV 40 mg/m2 over 1 hour on day 1 and oral pyridoxine 100 mg twice daily on days 1-28.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORArm II: Patients receive doxorubicin HCl liposome IV 40 mg/m2 over 1 hour on day 1 and oral placebo twice 100 mg daily on days 1-28.
Interventions
Arm I: Patients receive doxorubicin HCl liposome IV 40 mg/m2 over 1 hour on day 1 and oral pyridoxine twice 100 mg daily on days 1-28.
Arm II: Patients receive doxorubicin HCl liposome IV 40 mg/m2 over 1 hour on day 1 and oral placebo 100 mg twice daily on days 1-28.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Centerlead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (8)
Geauga Regional Hospital
Cleveland, Ohio, 44024, United States
Lake/University Ireland Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44060, United States
Case Medical Center, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-5065, United States
Southwest General Health Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44130, United States
University Suburban Health Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44143, United States
UHHS Westlake Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44145, United States
Mercy Cancer Center at Mercy Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44708, United States
UHHS Chagrin Highlands Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44708, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Interim analysis was conducted after 30 patients were enrolled and had evaluable PPE assessment data. Due to decreased accrual and similar PPE rates between groups, the trial was closed for enrollment after the interim analyses was completed.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Vivian von Gruenigen, MD
- Organization
- Case Medical Center, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vivian von Gruenigen, MD
Case Medical Center, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 25, 2005
First Posted
October 27, 2005
Study Start
April 1, 2004
Primary Completion
April 1, 2008
Study Completion
September 1, 2011
Last Updated
December 30, 2011
Results First Posted
December 22, 2010
Record last verified: 2011-12