Sirolimus-Eluting Stent vs. Intravascular Brachytherapy in In-Stent Restenotic Coronary Artery Lesions(SISR)
A Multicenter, Randomized Study of the Sirolimus-Eluting Bx VELOCITY® BALLOON Expandable Stent vs. Intravascular Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Patients With In-Stent Restenotic Coronary Artery Lesions
1 other identifier
interventional
384
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main objective of this study is to demonstrate the superiority or non-inferiority of the sirolimus-eluting Bx VELOCITY® stent compared to intravascular brachytherapy in patients with in-stent restenotic native coronary artery lesions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Feb 2003
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2003
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 30, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 4, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2009
CompletedNovember 19, 2009
November 1, 2009
1.9 years
September 30, 2005
November 17, 2009
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Target vessel failure (TVF) defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization at 9 months post-procedure.
9 months post-procedure.
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Angiographic in-lesion and in-stent binary restenosis (³ 50% diameter stenosis) at 6 months post-procedure (by QCA).
6 months post-procedure
Post-procedure and six-month in-stent and in-lesion percent diameter stenosis (%DS) and late loss at 6 months post-procedure (by QCA) - [analysis at 6 months chosen so that results from the GAMMA Trial can be used].
6 months post-procedure
Post-procedure and six-month in-stent and in-lesion minimum lumen diameter (MLD) (by QCA).
Post-procedure and at six-month
Target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 6 and 9 months post-procedure.
6 and 9 months post-procedure
Target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 6 and 9 months post-procedure.
6 and 9 months post-procedure
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTALCypher Bx Velocity
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORBrachytherapy
Interventions
Sirolimus-Eluting Bx Velocity® Balloon Expandable Stent
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \. The patient has an in-stent restenosis of \> 50% (by subjective angiographic determination of the minimal luminal diameter compared to the distal reference diameter) within a native coronary artery which has previously undergone stent placement ( 4 weeks). Lesions must meet ISR Classification I-III.
- \. The patient has a history, signs of, or laboratory studies that suggest coronary ischemia attributable to the target stenosis. The diagnosis of angina pectoris is defined by Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification (CCS I, II, III, or IV) OR unstable angina pectoris (Braunwald Classification B\&C, I-II) OR patients with documented silent ischemia;
- \. The study target lesion must be located in an in-stent restenotic native coronary artery measuring \> 2.75mm and 3.5mm in diameter and \> 15mm and 40mm in length to allow treatment with a maximum of three 18mm stents. The target lesion must have undergone coronary interventional treatment \> 4 weeks previously. Patients with one or more prior percutaneous coronary interventions at the target lesion are acceptable candidates.
- \. The vessel 1cm distal to the target lesion is \> 2.5mm in diameter;
- \. Ejection Fraction must be \> 40%;
- \. The study target lesion cannot be located in a vessel containing a second lesion requiring treatment at the time of the procedure.
- \. Male or non-pregnant female patients \> 18 years of age inclusive. NOTE: Females of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test (urine or serum) prior to enrollment and must use birth control for 6 months.
You may not qualify if:
- The study target lesion has definite or possible thrombus present by angiographic criteria.
- The patient has experienced a Q-wave or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction with documented total CK \> 2 times normal within the preceding 24 hours and the CK and CK-MB enzymes remain above normal at the time of treatment.
- Impaired renal function (Serum creatinine \> 2.0mg/dl);
- The patient has unstable angina classified as Braunwald III B or C, or is having peri infarction angina.
- The left ventricular ejection fraction is \< 40%.
- The target vessel has previously sustained a perforation.
- Totally occluded vessel (TIMI 0 level);
- Prior stent within 5mm of target lesion;
- There is a total occlusion of the restenosed-stent (ISR Classification IV) prior to the interventional procedure.
- Has an ostial target lesion;
- Significant (\> 50%) in-stent restenoses proximal or distal to the target lesion that might require revascularization or impede runoff;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cordis US Corp.lead
Study Sites (1)
Mayo Clinic Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Related Publications (2)
Holmes DR Jr, Teirstein P, Satler L, Sketch M, O'Malley J, Popma JJ, Kuntz RE, Fitzgerald PJ, Wang H, Caramanica E, Cohen SA; SISR Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents vs vascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis within bare-metal stents: the SISR randomized trial. JAMA. 2006 Mar 15;295(11):1264-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.11.1264. Epub 2006 Mar 12.
PMID: 16531619RESULTHolmes DR Jr, Teirstein PS, Satler L, Sketch MH Jr, Popma JJ, Mauri L, Wang HP, Schleckser PA, Cohen SA; SISR Investigators. 3-year follow-up of the SISR (Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Vascular Brachytherapy for In-Stent Restenosis) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Aug;1(4):439-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.05.010.
PMID: 19463342RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David R. Holmes, Jr., MD
Mayo Clinic - Rochester, Minnesota
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 30, 2005
First Posted
October 4, 2005
Study Start
February 1, 2003
Primary Completion
January 1, 2005
Study Completion
September 1, 2009
Last Updated
November 19, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-11