Repertaxin in Prevention of Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation
A Phase 2, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study of Repertaxin in the Prevention of Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation
1 other identifier
interventional
114
2 countries
6
Brief Summary
The objective of this clinical study was to evaluate whether CXCL8 (CXC ligand 8 \[formerly interleukin (IL)-8\]) inhibition with repertaxin leads to reduced severity of primary graft dysfunction, as the result of improved functional and clinical outcomes in lung transplantation patients. The safety of repertaxin in the specific clinical setting was also evaluated. The ability of repertaxin to reduce target cells (polymorphonuclear leukocyte \[PMN\]) infiltration into the graft was evaluated to confirm its mechanism of action.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started May 2005
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 21, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 23, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 13, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 13, 2007
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 11, 2024
CompletedDecember 11, 2024
December 1, 2024
1.4 years
September 21, 2005
January 8, 2024
December 9, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
PaO2/FiO2 Ratio at ICU Admission (Time 0) and 24 Hours
The PaO2/FiO2 ratio was calculated to assess the severity of hypoxemia, or low blood oxygen levels. A low PaO2/FiO2 value has been associated with increased mortality and hospital stay in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). It was calculated by dividing the partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) by the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2). A normal P/F ratio was typically above 300, and a lower ratio indicates a greater severity of hypoxemia. As the Pa02/Fi02 ratio was dependent on altitude, data were corrected for altitude in the analyses of corrected data. The correction factor is defined as (Pressure at Denver)/(Pressure at sea level) = 633/760 = 0.8329; PaO2 values were corrected as follows: Corrected value = measured value/0.8329
At T0 (time of ICU admission) and 24 hours post-ICU admission
Secondary Outcomes (11)
PaO2/FiO2 Ratio (ICU Admission Then 24 Hours up to Extubation or up to 72 Hours)
At ICU admission (T0), 24, 48 and 72 hours post-ICU admission
Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data)
At ICU admission (T0), 24, 48 and 72 hours post-ICU admission
Time to Freedom From Mechanical Ventilation
At 24, 48, 72 hours post ICU admission
Probability of Death During Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay at Different Timepoints
At 24, 48, 72 hours post ICU admission
Number of Patients Dead Within 30 Days Post-transplant
Up to 30 days post-transplant
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Repertaxin
EXPERIMENTALBoth repertaxin and placebo were aqueous solutions packaged into identical clear glass Type I ampoule single dose units. Each ampoule contained 10 mL of either repertaxin or placebo.The dosing solution for infusion was prepared aseptically at the designated Pharmacy within each center and dispensed as 12.65 mg/mL solution in appropriate size infusion bags. An initial 'loading dose' of Repertaxin of 4.488 mg/kg body weight/hour was administered over 30 minutes followed by a maintenance dose of 2.772 mg/kg body weight/hour lasting 47.5 hours.The loading and maintenance doses were administered using the same dosing solution (Repertaxin 12.65 mg/ml), but with the pump rate altered to provide an infusion rate of approximately 0.35 mUkg/hour and 0.22 ml/kg/hour, respectively.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORBoth repertaxin and placebo were aqueous solutions packaged into identical clear glass Type I ampoule single dose units. The dosing solution for infusion was prepared aseptically at the designated Pharmacy within each center and dispensed as 12.65 mg/mL solution in appropriate size infusion bags. ampoule contained 10 mL of either repertaxin or placebo. An initial 'loading dose' of 9 mg/ml sodium chloride (NaCl) solution was administered over 30 minutes, followed by a maintenance dose lasting 47.5 hours.
Interventions
An initial 'loading dose' of repertaxin was administered over 30 minutes by intravenous infusion followed by a maintenance dose lasting 47.5 hours.The infusion was to start approximately 2 hours prior to the anticipated time of reperfusion and was to continue during the ICU/hospital stay. The study medication was administered as a continuous intravenous infusion into a (high flow) central vein, by an infusion pump adequate to provide reliable infusion rates , as per treatment schedule. Total infusion volume was not to exceed 500 mL/24 hours.
An initial 'loading dose' of placebo was administered over 30 minutes by intravenous infusion followed by a maintenance dose lasting 47.5 hours.The infusion was to start approximately 2 hours prior to the anticipated time of reperfusion and was to continue during the ICU/hospital stay. The placebo was administered as a continuous intravenous infusion into a (high flow) central vein, by an infusion pump adequate to provide reliable infusion rates , as per treatment schedule. Total infusion volume was not to exceed 500 mL/24 hours.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients accepted and listed for transplantation due to irreversible, progressive disabling, end-stage pulmonary disease;
- Ages 18 to 65 years;
- Body weight 30 to 95 kg (inclusive) (i.e. up to 95.99 kg);
- Planned isolated (single and bi-lateral) lung transplant from a non-living donor with brain death. This included lobar lung transplant involving excision and sizing of a cadaver donor lobe to meet the thoracic dimension of the recipient before being transplanted;
- Normal renal function at the time of transplant as per calculated creatinine clearance (Clcr) 60 mL/min. Creatinine clearance was calculated according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula;
- Patient was willing and able to comply with the protocol procedures for the duration of the study, including scheduled follow-up visits and examinations;
- Patient gave written informed consent, prior to any study-related procedure not part of normal medical care, with the understanding that consent could be withdrawn by the patient at any time without prejudice to their future medical care.
You may not qualify if:
- Recipients of an intended multiple organ transplant, including heart-lung and liver-lung transplantation;
- Recipients of a lung from a living lobar donor;
- Recipients of a lung from a non-heart beating donor;
- Re-do lung transplantation;
- Recipients requiring mechanical ventilation at the time of transplant;
- Recipients with an extra-respiratory tract site of infection (positive blood culture(s) and/or fever associated with other signs of systemic sepsis syndrome). The criterion was not meant to exclude bacteraemic cystic fibrosis patients with or without fever, unless they presented with other signs of sepsis;
- Recipients with hepatic dysfunction (bilirubin exceeding 3 mg/dL and/or transaminases \>3X upper limit of normal \[ULN\]) at the time of transplant;
- Hypersensitivity to:
- Ibuprofen or to more than one non steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID);
- Medications belonging to the class of sulfonamides, such as sulfamethazine, sulfamethoxazole, sulfasalazine, nimesulide or celecoxib;
- Patients simultaneously participating in any other studies involving a study drug to be administered concomitantly with the investigational product and/or a study drug intended to prevent ischemia/reperfusion injury;
- Planned use of anli-CD3 monoclonal antibody (Orthoclone OKT3) or alemtuzumab (Campath) induction immunosuppression;
- Planned use of sirolimus in the first 3 months after transplantation;
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women (NB: pregnancy was lo be avoided in patients or partners during the first month of participation in the study; no other specific warnings were described, considering even stricter general recommendations concerning pregnancy in transplanted patients, the treatment course of the investigational product, its pharmacokinetic profile, and the lack of significant adverse effects on mating performance and fertility in animal studies).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
University of South California, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States
University of Colorado, Health Sciences Centre
Denver, Colorado, 80262, United States
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G2C4, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Development & Operations
- Organization
- Dompé farmaceutici SpA
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Roberto Novellini, MD
Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- All personnel involved and patients participating in the study were to remain blinded to the patient randomization codes with the exception of those involved in packaging and labelling the study medication. After the database lock of data recorded in the main part of the study, corresponding to the Month 1 follow-up visit of the last patient in, the blind code was broken and the study continued in an open fashion.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 21, 2005
First Posted
September 23, 2005
Study Start
May 1, 2005
Primary Completion
September 13, 2006
Study Completion
September 13, 2007
Last Updated
December 11, 2024
Results First Posted
December 11, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12