Efficacy and Safety Study of TAK-128 in Treating Subjects With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Three Doses of TAK-128 in Subjects With Mild to Moderate Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
2 other identifiers
interventional
343
2 countries
48
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of TAK-128, once daily (QD), in treating subjects with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Mar 2005
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
48 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 27, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 29, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2006
CompletedFebruary 28, 2012
February 1, 2012
1.2 years
September 27, 2005
February 27, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from Baseline in composite measure of maximal nerve conduction velocity (Nerve Conduction Studies).
Week 24 or Final Visit
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change from Baseline in the electrophysiologic parameters for individual nerves, including amplitudes (Nerve Conduction Studies).
Week 24 or Final Visit
Change from Baseline in vibration perception threshold measurements (Quantitative Sensory Testing).
Weeks 12, 24 or Final Visit
Change from Baseline in pain scores (Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire).
Weeks: 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 or Final Visit
Change from Baseline in the neurological examination (Clinical Neurological Examination).
Weeks 12, 24 or Final Visit
Change from Baseline in quality of life index (SF-36 Health Survey).
Weeks: 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 or Final Visit
Study Arms (4)
TAK-128 5 mg QD
EXPERIMENTALTAK-128 50 mg QD
EXPERIMENTALTAK-128 100 mg QD
EXPERIMENTALPlacebo QD
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female subjects of childbearing potential must be nonpregnant, nonlactating and on an acceptable form of contraception.
- The subject has fasting clinical laboratory evaluations within the normal reference range for the testing laboratory, or if not, the results must be deemed not clinically significant by the investigator prior to randomization.
- The subject has type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus using World Health Organization Criteria.
- The subject has mild to moderate peripheral neuropathy defined as:
- Clinical neuropathy score greater than or equal to 2.5 on the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument.
- Confirmed abnormality of at least 2 nerve conduction study velocity parameters as defined by the Neurological Core Laboratory.
- Sural sensory nerve potential amplitude greater than or equal to 1 microvolt.
- The subject's glycosylated hemoglobin is less than or equal to 10%.
- The subject is on stable diabetic therapy for at least 3 months prior to randomization.
- The subject is on stable pain medication for at least 6 weeks prior to randomization, if applicable.
- The subject's creatinine level is less than or equal to 2 mg/dL or 176.8 umol/L.
- The subject is willing to follow an American Diabetes Association or similar recommended dietary regimen.
You may not qualify if:
- The subject has a history of other neuropathies due to causes other than diabetes such as alcohol abuse liver or renal disease, uremia, toxic exposure, genetic factors, inflammatory demyelinating diseases, monoclonal gammopathies; or endocrine, metabolic or nutritional disorders (included treated or untreated pernicious anemia).
- The subject has clinical or electrophysiologic evidence of bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome.
- The subject has a significant skin abnormality or ulcerative changes in their lower extremities.
- The subject's body mass index is greater than 40 kg/m2.
- The subject's systolic blood pressure is greater than 160 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure is greater than 95 mm Hg.
- The subject has a history of myocardial infarction, coronary angioplasty or bypass graft, unstable angina pectoris, transient ischemic attacks, significant electrocardiograms, or documented cerebrovascular accident within 6 months prior to Screening, or is New York Heart Association Functional Cardiac Classification III or IV.
- The subject has an alanine aminotransferase level of greater than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal, active liver disease, or jaundice.
- The subject has a significant, actively treated or unstable pulmonary, gastrointestinal, hepatic, hematologic, musculoskeletal, or endocrine (other than diabetes mellitus or stably treated hypothyroidism) disease.
- The subject has a previous history of cancer, other than basal cell carcinoma, that has not been in remission for at least 5 years prior to the first dose of study drug.
- The subject has taken lipoic acid, linolenic acid (primrose oil), inositol, topiramate, Acetyl-L-Carnitine, nerve growth factors, or capsaicin within 30 days prior to Screening.
- The subject has any other serious disease or condition at Screening or at randomization that might affect life expectancy or make it difficult to successfully manage and follow the subject according to the protocol.
- The subject has a history of drug abuse (defined as illicit drug use) or a history of alcohol abuse (defined as regular or daily consumption of more than 4 alcoholic drinks per day) within the past 2 years.
- The subject has a known hypersensitivity to a compound related to TAK-128.
- Subjects can not use any of the following prescription medications throughout the duration of the study, including:
- Lipoic acid
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Takedalead
Study Sites (48)
Unknown Facility
Mesa, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Peoria, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Huntington Beach, California, United States
Unknown Facility
La Jolla, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Long Beach, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Los Angeles, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Northridge, California, United States
Unknown Facility
San Francisco, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Torrance, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Tustin, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Aventura, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Hialeah, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Plant City, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Decatur, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Unknown Facility
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Flint, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Unknown Facility
Elizabeth, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Buffalo, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Staten Island, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Greenville, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Morrisville, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Dallas, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Tacoma, Washington, United States
Unknown Facility
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Unknown Facility
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Unknown Facility
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
North Bay, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Sarina, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Gatineau, Quebec, Canada
Unknown Facility
Laval, Quebec, Canada
Unknown Facility
Québec, Quebec, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Medical Director
Takeda
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 27, 2005
First Posted
September 29, 2005
Study Start
March 1, 2005
Primary Completion
May 1, 2006
Study Completion
May 1, 2006
Last Updated
February 28, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-02