NCT00223808

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a lower-dose and higher-dose therapy program for persons recovering from a recent stroke using mechanically-assisted upper limb movement with a device called MIME. A control group receives additional occupational therapy without the use of MIME.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
71

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2002

Longer than P75 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2002

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 14, 2005

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 22, 2005

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2008

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2008

Completed
5.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 17, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

February 17, 2014

Status Verified

January 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

6.5 years

First QC Date

September 14, 2005

Results QC Date

October 9, 2013

Last Update Submit

January 3, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

RehabilitationRobotics

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Fugl-Meyer Score Change Immediately Following Study Intervention.

    Change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) score. The FMA evaluates motor function, sensation, balance, and joint function in hemiplegic patients and provides a cumulative numerical score. It is widely used to evaluate changes in function over time in clinical care and therapeutic trials following stroke. Five domains can be assessed, including motor function (upper and lower limbs); sensory function; balance; joint range of motion; and joint pain. Items within each domain are scored on a 3-point ordinal scale: 0 = cannot perform; 1 = performs partially; and 2 = performs fully. Subscales can be administered without the using the full test. For the upper limb motor function subscale used in this clinical trial, 33 items were evaluated, each rated on a 3-point scale (0-2), then summed for a maximum possible score of 66. A greater increase in the score represents a greater improvement in upper limb motor function.

    After study intervention (on completion of the maximum planned number of sessions for their group or discharge from inpatient rehabilitation, whichever came first) compared to baseline at study enrollment between 7 and 21 days post-stroke.

  • Fugl-Meyer Score Change at 6 Months

    Change in Fugl-Meyer score at 6-months from study enrollment compared to baseline. Maximum score = 66.

    FMA at 6 months from study enrollment compared to baseline FMA performed prior to study intervention, which began between 7 and 21 days post-stroke.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in FIM Score Immediately Following Study Intervention.

    After study intervention (on completion of the maximum planned number of sessions for each group or discharge from inpatient rehabilitation, whichever came first) compared to baseline at study enrollment between 7 and 21 days post-stroke.

  • Change in FIM Score at 6-months

    Change in FIM score at 6-months from study enrollment compared to baseline FIM prior to study intervention, which began between 7 and 21 days post-stroke.

Study Arms (3)

Robot-Low

EXPERIMENTAL

low-dose mechanically-assisted upper limb therapy

Other: Robot-Low

Robot-High

EXPERIMENTAL

high-dose mechanically-assisted upper limb therapy

Other: Robot-High

Control

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

additional traditional therapy

Other: Control

Interventions

1 hour/day of robot-assisted upper limb exercise therapy in addition to usual physical and occupational therapy

Robot-Low

2 hours/day of robot-assisted therapy in addition to usual physical and occupational therapy

Robot-High
ControlOTHER

1 hour/day of additional upper limb therapy that includes exposure to, but no manipulation by the robot

Control

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Over 21 years of age, weakness due to a recent stroke or other brain injury, and receiving rehabilitation. Subjects are inpatients at one of the participating VA hospitals.

You may not qualify if:

  • Unable to follow instructions; medically unstable.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

VA Palo Alto Health Care System

Palo Alto, California, 94304-1290, United States

Location

VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West LA

West Los Angeles, California, 90073, United States

Location

Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (152)

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location

Central Texas Veterans Health Care System

Temple, Texas, 76504, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Burgar CG, Lum PS, Scremin AM, Garber SL, Van der Loos HF, Kenney D, Shor P. Robot-assisted upper-limb therapy in acute rehabilitation setting following stroke: Department of Veterans Affairs multisite clinical trial. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(4):445-58. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2010.04.0062.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cerebrovascular DisordersHemiplegia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesParalysisNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Limitations and Caveats

Limitations include the relatively small number of subjects in each group and the variation in severity level across subjects. Subjects at the Houston site were enrolled earlier after stroke than in the LA site and the Palo Alto site.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Charles Burgar, MD
Organization
CTVHCS

Study Officials

  • Charles Burgar, MD

    Central Texas Veterans Health Care System

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2005

First Posted

September 22, 2005

Study Start

January 1, 2002

Primary Completion

July 1, 2008

Study Completion

July 1, 2008

Last Updated

February 17, 2014

Results First Posted

February 17, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-01

Locations