Study Stopped
Lack of Funding/ Resident in charge graduated
Determining the Effect of an "Alternate Recovery Protocol" Versus Current Standard of Care After Cesarean Section
1 other identifier
interventional
1,494
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial will compare two different approaches to patient recovery after cesarean section: the current standard of care versus an alternate management protocol. The goal of this study is to investigate whether an "alternate management" protocol after cesarean sections will yield the same results as alternate management in other surgical fields, including decreased narcotic consumption and quicker return of bowel function, without compromising patient morbidity or satisfaction. The investigators will assess postoperative narcotic consumption as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes will be return of bowel function, length of hospital stay, pain control, patient satisfaction, post-operative complications, and overall morbidity and mortality. Hypothesis: Initiating the alternate management protocol for cesarean sections will decrease narcotic consumption and hasten return of bowel function, without compromising patient satisfaction, level of pain control, or post-operative morbidity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Oct 2017
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 4, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 24, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 6, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 20, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 20, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 2, 2021
CompletedMarch 2, 2021
March 1, 2021
9 months
October 24, 2017
January 18, 2021
March 1, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Narcotic Utilization
total narcotic utilization measured with Morphine Milligram Equivalent (MME) The conversion scale being used will be the Center for Disease Control and Prevention Morphine Equivalent Score. Lower scores represent less opioid use and a better outcome. Higher scores represent more opioid use and a worse outcome.
From time of consent until hospital discharge (3 days)
Study Arms (2)
Alternate Management
EXPERIMENTALControl
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe regular Lankenau cesarean section order set.
Interventions
With the alternate management protocol, the pre-operative order set is the same, with the addition of a single preoperative dose of acetaminophen 1 g IV x1, gabapentin 600 mg PO x1, and ondansetron 8 mg IV x1. Post-operatively, patients receive the same ketorolac 30mg x 9 doses every 6 hours, as well as acetaminophen 975 mg every 6 hours, both given standing. These two are timed so the patient is receiving one of the two medications every 3 hours during their inpatient stay. After 9 doses of ketorolac, the patient receives 600mg of ibuprofen PO, also given standing, instead of the ketorolac. If the patient requires narcotics, they may receive them on an as needed basis. IV fluids are running at 80 cc/ hour. Patients are encouraged to ambulate, including the evening of the surgery, have their foley catheter removed 12 hours post-operatively, and can have a regular diet immediately.
The regular Lankenau cesarean section order set includes routine vital signs, labs, IV fluids, and fetal heart monitoring. Post standard cesarean section orders include IV fluids running at 125 cc/ hour, along with routine post-partum care. In terms of pain control, most patients receive 9 doses of 30mg of IV ketorolac every 6 hours, along with hydromorphone, oxycodone/acetaminophen, or a hydromorphone PCA, per patient or attending request.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Scheduled to undergo a cesarean section
You may not qualify if:
- Existing diagnosis of chronic pain
- Need to undergo a vertical skin incision
- AST \> 50; ALT \> 70
- Platelets below 80,000 on admission
- Need to undergo general anesthesia
- Tubal ligation at time of Cesarean section
- Prior or known allergy to any of the medications being utilized in this study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Lankenau Medical Center
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, 19096, United States
Related Publications (7)
Nelson G, Kalogera E, Dowdy SC. Enhanced recovery pathways in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Dec;135(3):586-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
PMID: 25316179BACKGROUNDMoore A, Costello J, Wieczorek P, Shah V, Taddio A, Carvalho JC. Gabapentin improves postcesarean delivery pain management: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2011 Jan;112(1):167-73. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181fdf5ee. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
PMID: 21081764BACKGROUNDDowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain--United States, 2016. JAMA. 2016 Apr 19;315(15):1624-45. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.1464.
PMID: 26977696BACKGROUNDCommittee opinion no. 633: Alcohol abuse and other substance use disorders: ethical issues in obstetric and gynecologic practice. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;125(6):1529-1537. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000466371.86393.9b.
PMID: 26000541BACKGROUNDSachs HC; Committee On Drugs. The transfer of drugs and therapeutics into human breast milk: an update on selected topics. Pediatrics. 2013 Sep;132(3):e796-809. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1985. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
PMID: 23979084BACKGROUNDWheeler M, Oderda GM, Ashburn MA, Lipman AG. Adverse events associated with postoperative opioid analgesia: a systematic review. J Pain. 2002 Jun;3(3):159-80. doi: 10.1054/jpai.2002.123652. No abstract available.
PMID: 14622770BACKGROUNDGuttuso T Jr, Shaman M, Thornburg LL. Potential maternal symptomatic benefit of gabapentin and review of its safety in pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Oct;181:280-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.08.013. Epub 2014 Aug 17.
PMID: 25195202BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Norman Brest
- Organization
- Main Line Health System
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Norman Brest, MD
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 24, 2017
First Posted
November 6, 2017
Study Start
October 4, 2017
Primary Completion
June 20, 2018
Study Completion
June 20, 2018
Last Updated
March 2, 2021
Results First Posted
March 2, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03