Analysis of Enamel Wear Against Ceramic Restorations
Analysis of Clinical Wear Patterns of Tooth Enamel and Ceramic Restorations as a Function of Particle Size, Inter-Particle Spacing and Fracture Toughness of Ceramic Crystals
2 other identifiers
observational
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
- 1.To characterize the microstructure (fracture toughness, particle size of ceramic, and inter-particle spacing) of three ceramic materials
- 2.To test the hypothesis that lower fracture toughness of glass and/or crystal phase in ceramics reduce wear damage of enamel.
- 3.To test the hypothesis that smaller sized crystals reduce wear damage of enamel.
- 4.To test the hypothesis that larger inter-particle spacing reduces wear damage of enamel.
- 5.To test the hypothesis that equivalent wear patterns exist in all directions between enamel versus enamel and ceramic versus enamel.
- 6.To test the hypothesis that bite force does not correlate with wear rates.
- 7.To test the hypothesis that salivary flow does not correlate with wear rates.
- 8.To test the hypothesis that a greater amount of wear is not associated with a loss in vertical dimension of occlusion.
- 9.To test the hypothesis that a greater amount of wear does not correlate with secondary cementum deposition as part of the passive eruption process.
- 10.To test the hypothesis that maximum wear occurs early and wear rates level off within the first two years.
- 11.To test the hypothesis that in vitro wear analysis does not correlate with in vivo wear measurements
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Apr 2003
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2003
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2009
CompletedNovember 22, 2016
April 1, 2013
5.8 years
September 13, 2005
November 18, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
wear of the opposing enamel will be measured yearly for four years
up to 4 years
Secondary Outcomes (2)
wear of ceramic in vivo
up to 4 years
improved function of crown
uo to 4 years
Study Arms (2)
metal-ceramic (D'Sign) o
Metal ceramic crown will be placed
an all-ceramic crown (IPS Empress2, Eris EXC).
All ceramic crown will be placed
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Patients needing a crown on a tooth that was opposed by a natural tooth. Patients seeking care in the UTHSCSA dental clinic.
You may qualify if:
- Subjects needing a crown on a posterior tooth that is opposed by a natural tooth.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects must be over 18 years of age with good overall health. No contraindications to dental treatment must be present.
- Subjects must have overall good dental health with no active tooth decay (caries) present and no periodontal disease. Pocket depth on all remaining teeth must not be more than 4 mm.
- Subjects must have no existing temporomandibular disorder, (e.g. clicking, popping, pain on opening) or parafunctional habits (e.g. bruxism, clenching)
- Subjects must need a crown on either a second premolar, first molar or second molar on any arch. Abutment teeth must be restorable and have a crown root ratio of at least 1:1. Abutment teeth must have a complement of opposing non-restored or minimally restored natural teeth. Minimally restored means nothing beyond a Class II amalgam restoration. Opposing arch cannot be a full coverage restoration or a partial denture. Contralateral tooth must be preferably present.
- Subjects must exhibit good oral hygiene and compliance.
- Subjects must not have any existing condition that could limit the flow of saliva; e.g. saliva flow must be of normal quantity.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antoniolead
- Ivoclar Vivadent AGcollaborator
- University of Floridacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229-3900, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Josephine Esquivel-Upshaw, D.M.D.,M.S.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2005
First Posted
September 22, 2005
Study Start
April 1, 2003
Primary Completion
January 1, 2009
Study Completion
January 1, 2009
Last Updated
November 22, 2016
Record last verified: 2013-04