NCT00209560

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of AQUAVAN® Injection when used for mild-to-moderate sedation in patients undergoing minor surgical procedures.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
168

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2004

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2004

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2005

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 13, 2005

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 21, 2005

Completed
6.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 19, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

January 9, 2015

Status Verified

July 1, 2014

First QC Date

September 13, 2005

Results QC Date

March 1, 2012

Last Update Submit

December 22, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

AQUAVAN® InjectionMidazolamMinor surgical proceduresSedation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Successful Sedation of Subjects, Defined for a Subject as Having 3 Consecutive Scores ≤ 4 on the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale and Completing the Procedure w/o Alternative Sedative Medications/w/o Manual/Mechanical Ventilation

    The Modified OAA/S (MOAA/S) scale is based on a validated, 6-point rating scale. Scores are not combined. Score 5 (alert) -- responds readily to name spoken in normal tone Score 4 -- Lethargic response to name spoken in normal tone Score 3 -- Responds only after name is called loudly and/or repeatedly Score 2 -- Responds only after mild prodding or shaking Score 1 -- Responds only after painful trapezius squeeze Score 0 -- Does not respond to painful trapezius squeeze

    Sedation success was assessed at 2 minute intervals until the end of the procedure

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Time to Fully Alert From the End of the Procedure

    At 2-minute intervals from the end of the procedure until the subject met the criteria for Fully Alert status

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient provided signed/dated Informed Consent and HIPAA Authorization after receiving a full explanation of the extent and nature of the study.
  • Patient was at least 18 years of age at the time of screening. (Prior to Amendment 1, dated 03 February 2005, this criterion restricted enrollment to patients who were ≥18 and ≤65 years of age. To ensure that safe dosing levels were administered to patients \>65 years of age, AQUAVAN and midazolam dosing levels were reduced when compared with patients between 18 and 65 years of age, inclusive. The majority of patients were enrolled prior to 03 February 2005.)
  • Female patient must have been surgically sterile, postmenopausal, or not pregnant or lactating, and must have been using an acceptable method of birth control for at least 1 month prior to dosing, with a negative urine pregnancy test result at screening and predosing periods.
  • Patient met the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification System of I to III.
  • Patient may have been an inpatient or outpatient scheduled to undergo a single minor surgical and/or therapeutic procedure.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient had a history of allergic reaction or hypersensitivity to any anesthetic agent, narcotic, or benzodiazepine.
  • Patient did not meet nils per os (NPO) status per ASA Guideline or institution's guideline.
  • Patient had condition(s) that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could interfere with appropriate airway management.
  • Patient had participated in an investigational drug study within 1 month prior to study start.
  • Patient had a history of mental or visual impairment that would not permit successful measurement of cognitive evaluations.
  • Patient was unwilling to adhere to pre- and postprocedural instructions.
  • The use of fentanyl or midazolam was contraindicated for the patient.
  • Patient had experienced multiple concurrent injuries or trauma.
  • Patient was scheduled to undergo multiple same-day procedures (eg, bunionectomies on both feet).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Median Neuropathy

Interventions

fospropofol

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

MononeuropathiesPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

Analysis of results from a previous fospropofol study (3000-0410) completed during the enrollment of this study indicated that the dosing regimen needed to be re-evaluated. The study was prematurely terminated after 168 subjects were randomized.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Eisai Medical Services
Organization
Eisai Inc

Study Officials

  • James Jones, MD, PharmD

    Eisai Inc.

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2005

First Posted

September 21, 2005

Study Start

October 1, 2004

Study Completion

March 1, 2005

Last Updated

January 9, 2015

Results First Posted

June 19, 2012

Record last verified: 2014-07