The Effectiveness of Improving Compliance With Diabetic Preventative Services and Modifying Vascular Risk
The Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioner Led Group Visits in Improving Compliance With Diabetic Preventative Services and Modifying Vascular Risk
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of group visits led by nurse practitioners in improving diabetic preventive services and vascular risk. Diabetes is notable for its high burden on the health of urban populations, a rich literature supporting evidenced based care, and great opportunities to apply systemic primary care interventions to reduce its toll. Extensive literature demonstrates sub-optimal care in the community as well as in academic centers. Addressing the needs of patients with diabetes is challenging in the primary-care environment and nurse case management and disease-specific group visits which focus on education and self-management skills have been shown to be useful adjuncts to traditional outpatient care. The study will attempt to demonstrate that nurse practitioner run group visits, during which the NP will provide didactic education, facilitate group interaction, and arrange referrals and laboratory testing as appropriate, will improve compliance with established American Diabetes Association guidelines for screening and preventive care and in doing so lower cardiovascular risk. Satisfaction with care, quality of life, and diabetic knowledge will be assessed before and after the patients complete the program. In addition, we will attempt to characterize barriers to care for patients who were formerly established with a primary care physician in the Primary Care Group, but who have not received diabetic care there for at least one year.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable diabetes
Started Aug 2003
Typical duration for not_applicable diabetes
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2003
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 12, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 20, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2005
CompletedSeptember 23, 2013
September 1, 2013
September 12, 2005
September 20, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Nurse practitioner run group visits will improve compliance with established American Diabetes Association guidelines for screening and preventive care
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Compliance with established American Diabetes Association guidelines for screening and preventive care will lower cardiovascular risk
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All diabetic patients age 40-79 who are followed in the Primary Care Group for Type 2 diabetes and who have seen their PCP at least 3 times in order to establish regular care
You may not qualify if:
- Patients younger than 40 years of age
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States
Related Publications (26)
Saydah SH, Eberhardt MS, Loria CM, Brancati FL. Age and the burden of death attributable to diabetes in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 2002 Oct 15;156(8):714-9. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwf111.
PMID: 12370159BACKGROUNDInstitute of Medicine (US) Committee on Identifying Priority Areas for Quality Improvement; Adams K, Corrigan JM, editors. Priority Areas for National Action: Transforming Health Care Quality. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2003. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK221294/
PMID: 25057643BACKGROUNDIntensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):837-53.
PMID: 9742976BACKGROUNDAdler AI, Stratton IM, Neil HA, Yudkin JS, Matthews DR, Cull CA, Wright AD, Turner RC, Holman RR. Association of systolic blood pressure with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 36): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000 Aug 12;321(7258):412-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7258.412.
PMID: 10938049BACKGROUNDAmerican Diabetes Association: clinical practice recommendations. Standards of medical for patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2003; 26:(suppl 1):533-50
BACKGROUNDFleming BB, Greenfield S, Engelgau MM, Pogach LM, Clauser SB, Parrott MA. The Diabetes Quality Improvement Project: moving science into health policy to gain an edge on the diabetes epidemic. Diabetes Care. 2001 Oct;24(10):1815-20. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.10.1815. No abstract available.
PMID: 11574448BACKGROUNDCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Preventive-care practices among persons with diabetes--United States, 1995 and 2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002 Nov 1;51(43):965-9.
PMID: 12433019BACKGROUNDSaaddine JB, Engelgau MM, Beckles GL, Gregg EW, Thompson TJ, Narayan KM. A diabetes report card for the United States: quality of care in the 1990s. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Apr 16;136(8):565-74. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-8-200204160-00005.
PMID: 11955024BACKGROUNDGrant RW, Cagliero E, Murphy-Sheehy P, Singer DE, Nathan DM, Meigs JB. Comparison of hyperglycemia, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia management in patients with type 2 diabetes. Am J Med. 2002 Jun 1;112(8):603-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01103-8.
PMID: 12034408BACKGROUNDSobel BE, Frye R, Detre KM; Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes Trial. Burgeoning dilemmas in the management of diabetes and cardiovascular disease: rationale for the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) Trial. Circulation. 2003 Feb 4;107(4):636-42. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000048897.03553.e4.
PMID: 12566379BACKGROUNDChin MH, Zhang JX, Merrell K. Diabetes in the African-American Medicare population. Morbidity, quality of care, and resource utilization. Diabetes Care. 1998 Jul;21(7):1090-5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.7.1090.
PMID: 9653601BACKGROUNDRenders CM, Valk GD, Griffin SJ, Wagner EH, Eijk Van JT, Assendelft WJ. Interventions to improve the management of diabetes in primary care, outpatient, and community settings: a systematic review. Diabetes Care. 2001 Oct;24(10):1821-33. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.10.1821.
PMID: 11574449BACKGROUNDSadur CN, Moline N, Costa M, Michalik D, Mendlowitz D, Roller S, Watson R, Swain BE, Selby JV, Javorski WC. Diabetes management in a health maintenance organization. Efficacy of care management using cluster visits. Diabetes Care. 1999 Dec;22(12):2011-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.12.2011.
PMID: 10587835BACKGROUNDNorris SL, Nichols PJ, Caspersen CJ, Glasgow RE, Engelgau MM, Jack L, Isham G, Snyder SR, Carande-Kulis VG, Garfield S, Briss P, McCulloch D. The effectiveness of disease and case management for people with diabetes. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2002 May;22(4 Suppl):15-38. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00423-3.
PMID: 11985933BACKGROUNDMontori VM, Dinneen SF, Gorman CA, Zimmerman BR, Rizza RA, Bjornsen SS, Green EM, Bryant SC, Smith SA; Translation Project Investigator Group. The impact of planned care and a diabetes electronic management system on community-based diabetes care: the Mayo Health System Diabetes Translation Project. Diabetes Care. 2002 Nov;25(11):1952-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.11.1952.
PMID: 12401738BACKGROUNDOlivarius NF, Beck-Nielsen H, Andreasen AH, Horder M, Pedersen PA. Randomised controlled trial of structured personal care of type 2 diabetes mellitus. BMJ. 2001 Oct 27;323(7319):970-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7319.970.
PMID: 11679387BACKGROUNDGaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N, Jensen GV, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jan 30;348(5):383-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021778.
PMID: 12556541BACKGROUNDBodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1775-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1775.
PMID: 12365965BACKGROUNDVrijhoef HJ, Diederiks JP, Spreeuwenberg C, Wolffenbuttel BH, van Wilderen LJ. The nurse specialist as main care-provider for patients with type 2 diabetes in a primary care setting: effects on patient outcomes. Int J Nurs Stud. 2002 May;39(4):441-51. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(01)00046-3.
PMID: 11909620BACKGROUNDLenz ER, Mundinger MO, Hopkins SC, Lin SX, Smolowitz JL. Diabetes care processes and outcomes in patients treated by nurse practitioners or physicians. Diabetes Educ. 2002 Jul-Aug;28(4):590-8. doi: 10.1177/014572170202800413.
PMID: 12224199BACKGROUNDRickheim PL, Weaver TW, Flader JL, Kendall DM. Assessment of group versus individual diabetes education: a randomized study. Diabetes Care. 2002 Feb;25(2):269-74. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.2.269.
PMID: 11815494BACKGROUNDChapin RB, Williams DC, Adair RF. Diabetes control improved when inner-city patients received graphic feedback about glycosylated hemoglobin levels. J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Feb;18(2):120-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20367.x.
PMID: 12542586BACKGROUNDRachmani R, Levi Z, Slavachevski I, Avin M, Ravid M. Teaching patients to monitor their risk factors retards the progression of vascular complications in high-risk patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus--a randomized prospective study. Diabet Med. 2002 May;19(5):385-92. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00701.x.
PMID: 12027926BACKGROUNDCiechanowski PS, Katon WJ, Russo JE. Depression and diabetes: impact of depressive symptoms on adherence, function, and costs. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Nov 27;160(21):3278-85. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.21.3278.
PMID: 11088090BACKGROUNDTerry K. Better quality care, bigger paycheck. Med Econ. 2002 Sep 9;79(17):99-100, 103-6, 109-10. No abstract available.
PMID: 12298136BACKGROUNDHawryluk M: CMS project to measure physician quality of care. Am Med News. American Medical Association. February 2003
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrew Davis, M.D.
University of Chicago
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 12, 2005
First Posted
September 20, 2005
Study Start
August 1, 2003
Study Completion
December 1, 2005
Last Updated
September 23, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-09