Study Stopped
Terminated due to lack of funding. Follow-up completed for all enrolled subjects.
ResQ Trial: Impact of an ITD and Active Compression Decompression CPR on Survival From Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
ResQ
ResQ Trial: Comparison of Standard CPR Alone Versus Active Compression Decompression CPR Plus an ITD on Survival From Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
4 other identifiers
interventional
1,653
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether performing active compression decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACD-CPR) with an impedance threshold device (ITD) compared to conventional standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (S-CPR) will impact the neurologic recovery and survival to hospital discharge following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2005
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 12, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 19, 2005
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 22, 2012
CompletedDecember 8, 2017
December 1, 2017
4.8 years
September 12, 2005
March 1, 2012
December 6, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Patients Who Survived to Hospital Discharge With Favorable Neurologic Function Defined as MRS Score <=3
favorable neurologic function is defined as modified Rankin Scale (MRS) score \<= 3. Modified Rankin Scale measures functional outcome in stroke. It is a scale of 0-5 where 0=no symptoms at all and 5=severe disability: bedridden, incontinent, and requiring constant nursing care and attention.
When the subject is discharged from the hospital; an average of 12 days after cardiac arrest for subjects surviving to hospital discharge
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Major Adverse Event Rate as Measured by Number of Patients With One or More Adverse Events
Time from cardiac arrest through hospital discharge (an average of 12 days for subjects surviving to hospital discharge
Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC)
Time of cardiac arrest until discontinuation of efforts
Survival to Hospital (e.g., Intensive Care Unit) Admission
Time of hospital admission, up to 1 day after cardiac arrest
Survival to 24 Hours
24 hours following cardiac arrest
Survival to Hospital Discharge
cardiac arrest to hospital discharge
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTALActive compression decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACD-CPR) with an impedance threshold device (ITD)
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (S-CPR)
Interventions
The ITD selectively prevents the influx of unnecessary respiratory gases into the patient during the chest wall recoil phase of CPR. The ResQPump, a hand-held device containing a suction cup, attaches to the chest and actively compresses and actively re-expands the chest during the performance of CPR.
Conventional standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (S-CPR)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult subjects initially presumed or known to be 18 years of age or older
- Subjects who present with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from presumed cardiac etiology and who receive CPR by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel for at least 1 minute
- Subjects whose airways are managed with a cuffed ET tube, combitube, or laryngeal mask airway or facemask
You may not qualify if:
- Adult subjects presumed or known to be less than 18 years of age
- Subjects with known or likely traumatic injuries causing cardiac arrest or cardiac arrest of presumed noncardiac origin
- Subjects with preexisting Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders
- Subjects with signs of obvious clinical death or conditions that preclude the use of CPR
- Family or legal representative request that the subject not be entered into the study
- Subjects experiencing in-hospital cardiac arrest
- Subjects with a recent sternotomy with wound not appearing completely healed (if unknown) or less than 6 months (if known)
- Subjects who received less than 1 minute of CPR by EMS personnel
- Subjects with a complete airway obstruction that cannot be cleared or in whom attempts at advanced airway management are unsuccessful
- Subjects intubated with a leaky or uncuffed advanced airway device or presence of stomas, tracheotomies, or tracheostomies
- Subjects who rearrest and are encountered by EMS within 365 days of the index cardiac arrest
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (7)
Site 07: Indianapolis, IN
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
Site 06: Washtenaw & Livingston Counties, MI
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106, United States
Site 04: Oakland & Macomb Counties, MI
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073, United States
Site 02: Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55415, United States
Site 01: St. Paul, MN
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55101, United States
Site 03: Whatcom County, WA
Bellingham, Washington, 98225, United States
Site 05: Oshkosh, WI
Oshkosh, Wisconsin, 54901, United States
Related Publications (21)
Wolcke BB, Mauer DK, Schoefmann MF, Teichmann H, Provo TA, Lindner KH, Dick WF, Aeppli D, Lurie KG. Comparison of standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus the combination of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation and an inspiratory impedance threshold device for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2003 Nov 4;108(18):2201-5. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000095787.99180.B5. Epub 2003 Oct 20.
PMID: 14568898BACKGROUNDPlaisance P, Adnet F, Vicaut E, Hennequin B, Magne P, Prudhomme C, Lambert Y, Cantineau JP, Leopold C, Ferracci C, Gizzi M, Payen D. Benefit of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation as a prehospital advanced cardiac life support. A randomized multicenter study. Circulation. 1997 Feb 18;95(4):955-61. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.4.955.
PMID: 9054757BACKGROUNDPlaisance P, Soleil C, Lurie KG, Vicaut E, Ducros L, Payen D. Use of an inspiratory impedance threshold device on a facemask and endotracheal tube to reduce intrathoracic pressures during the decompression phase of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med. 2005 May;33(5):990-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000163235.18990.f6.
PMID: 15891326BACKGROUNDPlaisance P, Lurie KG, Vicaut E, Martin D, Gueugniaud PY, Petit JL, Payen D. Evaluation of an impedance threshold device in patients receiving active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out of hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2004 Jun;61(3):265-71. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.01.032.
PMID: 15172704BACKGROUNDVoelckel WG, Lurie KG, Zielinski T, McKnite S, Plaisance P, Wenzel V, Lindner KH. The effects of positive end-expiratory pressure during active compression decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the inspiratory threshold valve. Anesth Analg. 2001 Apr;92(4):967-74. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200104000-00032.
PMID: 11273935BACKGROUNDPlaisance P, Lurie KG, Vicaut E, Adnet F, Petit JL, Epain D, Ecollan P, Gruat R, Cavagna P, Biens J, Payen D. A comparison of standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation and active compression-decompression resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. French Active Compression-Decompression Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 19;341(8):569-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908193410804.
PMID: 10451462BACKGROUNDSchneider T, Wik L, Baubin M, Dirks B, Ellinger K, Gisch T, Haghfelt T, Plaisance P, Vandemheen K. Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation--instructor and student manual for teaching and training. Part I: The workshop. Resuscitation. 1996 Oct;32(3):203-6. doi: 10.1016/0300-9572(96)00946-x.
PMID: 8923582BACKGROUNDWik L, Schneider T, Baubin M, Dirks B, Ellinger K, Gisch T, Haghfelt T, Plaisance P, Vandemheen K. Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation--instructor and student manual for teaching and training. Part II: A student and instructor manual. Resuscitation. 1996 Oct;32(3):206-12. doi: 10.1016/0300-9572(96)82051-x. No abstract available.
PMID: 8923583BACKGROUNDLurie K, Voelckel W, Plaisance P, Zielinski T, McKnite S, Kor D, Sugiyama A, Sukhum P. Use of an inspiratory impedance threshold valve during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a progress report. Resuscitation. 2000 May;44(3):219-30. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(00)00160-x.
PMID: 10825624BACKGROUNDPlaisance P, Lurie KG, Payen D. Inspiratory impedance during active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized evaluation in patients in cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2000 Mar 7;101(9):989-94. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.9.989.
PMID: 10704165BACKGROUNDMauer DK, Nolan J, Plaisance P, Sitter H, Benoit H, Stiell IG, Sofianos E, Keiding N, Lurie KG. Effect of active compression-decompression resuscitation (ACD-CPR) on survival: a combined analysis using individual patient data. Resuscitation. 1999 Aug;41(3):249-56. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(99)00073-8.
PMID: 10507710BACKGROUNDPirrallo RG, Aufderheide TP, Provo TA, Lurie KG. Effect of an inspiratory impedance threshold device on hemodynamics during conventional manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2005 Jul;66(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.12.027.
PMID: 15993724BACKGROUNDAufderheide TP, Pirrallo RG, Provo TA, Lurie KG. Clinical evaluation of an inspiratory impedance threshold device during standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 2005 Apr;33(4):734-40. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000155909.09061.12.
PMID: 15818098BACKGROUNDLurie KG, Zielinski T, McKnite S, Aufderheide T, Voelckel W. Use of an inspiratory impedance valve improves neurologically intact survival in a porcine model of ventricular fibrillation. Circulation. 2002 Jan 1;105(1):124-9. doi: 10.1161/hc0102.101391.
PMID: 11772887BACKGROUNDLanghelle A, Stromme T, Sunde K, Wik L, Nicolaysen G, Steen PA. Inspiratory impedance threshold valve during CPR. Resuscitation. 2002 Jan;52(1):39-48. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(01)00442-7.
PMID: 11801347BACKGROUNDYannopoulos D, Sigurdsson G, McKnite S, Benditt D, Lurie KG. Reducing ventilation frequency combined with an inspiratory impedance device improves CPR efficiency in swine model of cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2004 Apr;61(1):75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2003.12.006.
PMID: 15081185BACKGROUNDRaedler C, Voelckel WG, Wenzel V, Bahlmann L, Baumeier W, Schmittinger CA, Herff H, Krismer AC, Lindner KH, Lurie KG. Vasopressor response in a porcine model of hypothermic cardiac arrest is improved with active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation using the inspiratory impedance threshold valve. Anesth Analg. 2002 Dec;95(6):1496-502, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200212000-00007.
PMID: 12456407BACKGROUNDFrascone RJ, Bitz D, Lurie K. Combination of active compression decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the inspiratory impedance threshold device: state of the art. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2004 Jun;10(3):193-201. doi: 10.1097/01.ccx.0000126089.40242.a9.
PMID: 15166836BACKGROUNDLurie KG, Shultz JJ, Callaham ML, Schwab TM, Gisch T, Rector T, Frascone RJ, Long L. Evaluation of active compression-decompression CPR in victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA. 1994 May 11;271(18):1405-11.
PMID: 8176802BACKGROUNDVoelckel WG, Lurie KG, Sweeney M, McKnite S, Zielinski T, Lindstrom P, Peterson C, Wenzel V, Lindner KH. Effects of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the inspiratory threshold valve in a young porcine model of cardiac arrest. Pediatr Res. 2002 Apr;51(4):523-7. doi: 10.1203/00006450-200204000-00020.
PMID: 11919340BACKGROUNDAufderheide TP, Frascone RJ, Wayne MA, Mahoney BD, Swor RA, Domeier RM, Olinger ML, Holcomb RG, Tupper DE, Yannopoulos D, Lurie KG. Standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation with augmentation of negative intrathoracic pressure for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2011 Jan 22;377(9762):301-11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62103-4.
PMID: 21251705RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director of Clinical Trials
- Organization
- Advanced Circulatory Systems, Inc.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Keith G. Lurie, MD
Advanced Circulatory Systems
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 12, 2005
First Posted
September 19, 2005
Study Start
October 1, 2005
Primary Completion
July 1, 2010
Study Completion
July 1, 2010
Last Updated
December 8, 2017
Results First Posted
August 22, 2012
Record last verified: 2017-12