BENEFIT Study (Betaferon® / Betaseron® in Newly Emerging Multiple Sclerosis for Initial Treatment) and BENEFIT Follow-up Study
Open-label, Multi-center Phase III Extension of the Double-blind, Placebo-controlled BENEFIT Study (no. 92012/304747) to Obtain Long-term Follow-up Data of Patients With Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and Patients With a First Demyelinating Event Suggestive of MS Treated With 8 MIU (250 µg) Interferon Beta-1b (Betaferon® / Betaseron®) Given Subcutaneously Every Other Day for at Least 36 Months.
2 other identifiers
interventional
468
20 countries
94
Brief Summary
This study will primarily compare the long-term effects of an early and continued treatment with Betaferon/Betaseron (patients who were treated with active medication during the double-blind BENEFIT study) to treatment initiated either after Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) has been diagnosed or after two years (those patients who were treated with placebo during the double-blind BENEFIT study). Analyses are based on the integrated data of the initial BENEFIT study and this follow-up study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 multiple-sclerosis
Started Aug 2002
Longer than P75 for phase_3 multiple-sclerosis
94 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2002
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 9, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 16, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 30, 2010
CompletedDecember 30, 2013
December 1, 2013
5.8 years
September 9, 2005
July 23, 2009
December 4, 2013
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Time to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) Represented by Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Cumulative Percentage of Participants With CDMS at Selected Points in Time
CDMS could be reached due to a qualifying relapse or sustained progression of 1.5 points on the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) as compared to the lowest EDSS obtained during screening or Day 1. The validity of CDMS diagnoses was confirmed by a central committee. The EDSS scale quantifies disability in MS in 8 functional systems, values vary between 0="normal neurological examination" and 10="death due to MS" measured in half-points on an ordinal scale. Time to CDMS = date of CDMS - date of Day 1 + 1 or time to CDMS = date of last clinical visit - date of Day 1 + 1 (right-censored)
up to 60 months after start of treatment
Time to Confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Progression Represented by Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Cumulative Percentage of Participants With Confirmed EDSS Progression at Selected Points in Time
EDSS progression was defined as an increase in the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) of 1.0 point compared to the lowest EDSS score obtained during the screening or baseline visit, if this score was \<= 5.5. A confirmed EDSS progression status was defined as an EDSS progression observed at two consecutive scheduled visits at least 140 days apart from each other. The EDSS scale is a method of quantifying disability in multiple sclerosis in eight functional systems and values vary between 0="normal neurological examination" and 10="death due to MS" measured in half-points on a scale.
up to 60 months after start of treatment
Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS) Trial Outcome Index (TOI) at Month 60
As an index of health related quality of life in people diagnosed with MS, the FAMS Trial Outcome Index covers overall physical health (sum of sub-scale scores Mobility, Symptoms, Thinking/Fatigue, Additional Concerns) with a score range from 0 to 148. A higher score reflects a higher overall physical health as reported by patients.
60 months after start of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Relapse-based Efficacy Domain: Time to Multiple Sclerosis (MS) According to McDonald Criteria
up to 60 months after start of treatment
Relapse-based Efficacy Domain: Hazard Ratio for Recurrent Relapses
up to 60 months after start of treatment
Relapse-based Efficacy Domain (Supportive): Annualized Relapse Rate
up to 60 months after start of treatment
Disability-based Efficacy Domain: Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) at Month 60
60 months after start of treatment
MRI (Magnet-Resonance Imaging)-Based Efficacy Domain: Cumulative Number of Newly Active Lesions at Month 60
up to 60 months after start of treatment
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Initial IFNB-1b (Interferon beta-1b)
EXPERIMENTALInitial Betaferon/Betaseron treatment (Interferon beta-1b, IFNB-1b), 250 ug administered s.c. (subcutaneous) every other day, continued in Follow-up phase
Initial Placebo
EXPERIMENTALInitial placebo treatment; Betaferon/Betaseron, 250 ug administered s.c. (subcutaneous) every other day offered in Follow-up phase (= this trial)
Interventions
Initial Betaferon/Betaseron treatment (Interferon beta-1b, IFNB-1b), 250 ug administered s.c. (subcutaneous) every other day, continued in Follow-up phase
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who have reached scheduled end of study in BENEFIT, either by developing CDMS or by completing 24 months
You may not qualify if:
- No participation in the initial BENEFIT study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Bayerlead
Study Sites (94)
Unknown Facility
Graz, 8036, Austria
Unknown Facility
Innsbruck, 6020, Austria
Unknown Facility
Vienna, 1090, Austria
Unknown Facility
Brussels, 1200, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Leuven, 3000, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Liège, 4000, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9, Canada
Unknown Facility
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 2B5, Canada
Unknown Facility
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada
Unknown Facility
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada
Unknown Facility
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada
Unknown Facility
Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1, Canada
Unknown Facility
Brno, 63900, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Hradec Králové, 50005, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Ostrava, 70852, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Pilsen, 30460, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Prague, 10034, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Prague, 12808, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Glostrup Municipality, 2600, Denmark
Unknown Facility
Helsinki, 00100, Finland
Unknown Facility
Kuopio, 70210, Finland
Unknown Facility
Oulu, 90029, Finland
Unknown Facility
Seinäjoki, 60220, Finland
Unknown Facility
Tampere, 33521, Finland
Unknown Facility
Turku, 20100, Finland
Unknown Facility
Rennes, Brittany Region, 35038, France
Unknown Facility
Bordeaux, Gironde, 33076, France
Unknown Facility
Clermont-Ferrand, 63003, France
Unknown Facility
Dijon, 21033, France
Unknown Facility
Lille, 59037, France
Unknown Facility
Nancy, 54035, France
Unknown Facility
Nice, 06000, France
Unknown Facility
Paris, 75019, France
Unknown Facility
Toulouse, 31059, France
Unknown Facility
Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, 89081, Germany
Unknown Facility
München, Bavaria, 81377, Germany
Unknown Facility
Regensburg, Bavaria, 93053, Germany
Unknown Facility
Würzburg, Bavaria, 97080, Germany
Unknown Facility
Hennigsdorf, Brandenburg, 16761, Germany
Unknown Facility
Giessen, Hesse, 35392, Germany
Unknown Facility
Marburg, Hesse, 35039, Germany
Unknown Facility
Offenbach, Hesse, 63069, Germany
Unknown Facility
Braunschweig, Lower Saxony, 38126, Germany
Unknown Facility
Göttingen, Lower Saxony, 37099, Germany
Unknown Facility
Greifswald, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, 17475, Germany
Unknown Facility
Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 50931, Germany
Unknown Facility
Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, 40225, Germany
Unknown Facility
Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, 40479, Germany
Unknown Facility
Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149, Germany
Unknown Facility
Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, 55101, Germany
Unknown Facility
Homburg, Saarland, 66424, Germany
Unknown Facility
Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, 06120, Germany
Unknown Facility
Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, 39120, Germany
Unknown Facility
Berlin, State of Berlin, 12200, Germany
Unknown Facility
Berlin, State of Berlin, 13585, Germany
Unknown Facility
Erfurt, Thuringia, 99089, Germany
Unknown Facility
Szeged, Csongrád megye, 6720, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Budapest, 1076, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Budapest, 1145, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Budapest, 1204, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Debrecen, 4032, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Haifa, Israel, 34362, Israel
Unknown Facility
Tel Litwinsky, Israel, 52621, Israel
Unknown Facility
Gallarate, Varese, 21013, Italy
Unknown Facility
Milan, 20132, Italy
Unknown Facility
Padua, 35128, Italy
Unknown Facility
Pavia, 27100, Italy
Unknown Facility
Torino, 10126, Italy
Unknown Facility
Sittard, 6131 BK, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Tilburg, 5022 GC, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Bergen, N-5021, Norway
Unknown Facility
Bydgoszcz, 85681, Poland
Unknown Facility
Krakow, 31503, Poland
Unknown Facility
Lodz, 90153, Poland
Unknown Facility
Lublin, 20090, Poland
Unknown Facility
Wroclaw, 50420, Poland
Unknown Facility
Coimbra, 3000, Portugal
Unknown Facility
Ljubljana, 1525, Slovenia
Unknown Facility
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907, Spain
Unknown Facility
Barakaldo, Vizcaya, 48903, Spain
Unknown Facility
Barcelona, 08035, Spain
Unknown Facility
Barcelona, 08036, Spain
Unknown Facility
Madrid, 28040, Spain
Unknown Facility
Málaga, 29010, Spain
Unknown Facility
Seville, 41071, Spain
Unknown Facility
Valencia, 46026, Spain
Unknown Facility
Gothenburg, 41685, Sweden
Unknown Facility
Basel, Canton of Basel-City, 4031, Switzerland
Unknown Facility
Sankt Gallen, 9007, Switzerland
Unknown Facility
Dundee, Scotland, DD1 9SY, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Aberdeen, AB25 2ZN, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
London, W6 8RF, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Sheffield, S10 2JF, United Kingdom
Related Publications (14)
Edan G, Kappos L, Montalban X, Polman CH, Freedman MS, Hartung HP, Miller D, Barkhof F, Herrmann J, Lanius V, Stemper B, Pohl C, Sandbrink R, Pleimes D; BENEFIT Study Group. Long-term impact of interferon beta-1b in patients with CIS: 8-year follow-up of BENEFIT. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Nov;85(11):1183-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-306222. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
PMID: 24218527BACKGROUNDNagtegaal GJ, Pohl C, Wattjes MP, Hulst HE, Freedman MS, Hartung HP, Miller D, Montalban X, Kappos L, Edan G, Pleimes D, Beckman K, Stemper B, Polman CH, Sandbrink R, Barkhof F. Interferon beta-1b reduces black holes in a randomised trial of clinically isolated syndrome. Mult Scler. 2014 Feb;20(2):234-42. doi: 10.1177/1352458513494491. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
PMID: 23842212BACKGROUNDPenner IK, Stemper B, Calabrese P, Freedman MS, Polman CH, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Barkhof F, Pleimes D, Lanius V, Pohl C, Kappos L, Sandbrink R. Effects of interferon beta-1b on cognitive performance in patients with a first event suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2012 Oct;18(10):1466-71. doi: 10.1177/1352458512442438. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
PMID: 22492127BACKGROUNDKappos L, Freedman MS, Polman CH, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Barkhof F, Radu EW, Metzig C, Bauer L, Lanius V, Sandbrink R, Pohl C; BENEFIT Study Group. Long-term effect of early treatment with interferon beta-1b after a first clinical event suggestive of multiple sclerosis: 5-year active treatment extension of the phase 3 BENEFIT trial. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Nov;8(11):987-97. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70237-6. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
PMID: 19748319RESULTHartung HP, Freedman MS, Polman CH, Edan G, Kappos L, Miller DH, Montalban X, Barkhof F, Petkau J, White R, Sahajpal V, Knappertz V, Beckmann K, Lanius V, Sandbrink R, Pohl C; BENEFIT Study Group. Interferon beta-1b-neutralizing antibodies 5 years after clinically isolated syndrome. Neurology. 2011 Aug 30;77(9):835-43. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822c90d7. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
PMID: 21849647RESULTFreedman MS, Metzig C, Kappos L, Polman CH, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Yarden J, Spector L, Fire E, Dotan N, Schwenke S, Lanius V, Sandbrink R, Pohl C. Predictive nature of IgM anti-alpha-glucose serum biomarker for relapse activity and EDSS progression in CIS patients: a BENEFIT study analysis. Mult Scler. 2012 Jul;18(7):966-73. doi: 10.1177/1352458511432327. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
PMID: 22183938RESULTWaschbisch A, Sandbrink R, Hartung HP, Kappos L, Schwab S, Pohl C, Wiendl H. Evaluation of soluble HLA-G as a biomarker for multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2011 Aug 9;77(6):596-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318228c14d. Epub 2011 Jul 27. No abstract available.
PMID: 21795647RESULTMoraal B, Pohl C, Uitdehaag BM, Polman CH, Edan G, Freedman MS, Hartung HP, Kappos L, Miller DH, Montalban X, Lanius V, Sandbrink R, Barkhof F. Magnetic resonance imaging predictors of conversion to multiple sclerosis in the BENEFIT study. Arch Neurol. 2009 Nov;66(11):1345-52. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.243.
PMID: 19901165RESULTPolman C, Kappos L, Freedman MS, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Barkhof F, Selmaj K, Uitdehaag BM, Dahms S, Bauer L, Pohl C, Sandbrink R; BENEFIT investigators. Subgroups of the BENEFIT study: risk of developing MS and treatment effect of interferon beta-1b. J Neurol. 2008 Apr;255(4):480-7. doi: 10.1007/s00415-007-0733-2. Epub 2007 Nov 15.
PMID: 18004635RESULTCaloyeras JP, Zhang B, Wang C, Eriksson M, Fredrikson S, Beckmann K, Knappertz V, Pohl C, Hartung HP, Shah D, Miller JD, Sandbrink R, Lanius V, Gondek K, Russell MW. Cost-effectiveness analysis of interferon beta-1b for the treatment of patients with a first clinical event suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Clin Ther. 2012 May;34(5):1132-44. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.03.004. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
PMID: 22541587RESULTNielsen JM, Pohl C, Polman CH, Barkhof F, Freedman MS, Edan G, Miller DH, Bauer L, Sandbrink R, Kappos L, Uitdehaag BM. MRI characteristics are predictive for CDMS in monofocal, but not in multifocal patients with a clinically isolated syndrome. BMC Neurol. 2009 May 20;9:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-9-19.
PMID: 19457248RESULTBarkhof F, Polman CH, Radue EW, Kappos L, Freedman MS, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Poppe P, de Vos M, Lasri F, Bauer L, Dahms S, Wagner K, Pohl C, Sandbrink R. Magnetic resonance imaging effects of interferon beta-1b in the BENEFIT study: integrated 2-year results. Arch Neurol. 2007 Sep;64(9):1292-8. doi: 10.1001/archneur.64.9.1292.
PMID: 17846268RESULTKappos L, Freedman MS, Polman CH, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Barkhof F, Radu EW, Bauer L, Dahms S, Lanius V, Pohl C, Sandbrink R; BENEFIT Study Group. Effect of early versus delayed interferon beta-1b treatment on disability after a first clinical event suggestive of multiple sclerosis: a 3-year follow-up analysis of the BENEFIT study. Lancet. 2007 Aug 4;370(9585):389-97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61194-5.
PMID: 17679016RESULTDe Jager PL, Chibnik LB, Cui J, Reischl J, Lehr S, Simon KC, Aubin C, Bauer D, Heubach JF, Sandbrink R, Tyblova M, Lelkova P; Steering committee of the BENEFIT study; Steering committee of the BEYOND study; Steering committee of the LTF study; Steering committee of the CCR1 study; Havrdova E, Pohl C, Horakova D, Ascherio A, Hafler DA, Karlson EW. Integration of genetic risk factors into a clinical algorithm for multiple sclerosis susceptibility: a weighted genetic risk score. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Dec;8(12):1111-9. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70275-3. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
PMID: 19879194RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Participant Flow: Subject with "Other" as reason for not completing a study period are presented according to the NIH pre-specified categories as far as possible.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Therapeutic Area Head
- Organization
- BAYER
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Bayer Study Director
Bayer
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 9, 2005
First Posted
September 16, 2005
Study Start
August 1, 2002
Primary Completion
May 1, 2008
Study Completion
May 1, 2008
Last Updated
December 30, 2013
Results First Posted
November 30, 2010
Record last verified: 2013-12