A Cluster Randomized Trial to Assess the Impact of Opinion Leader Endorsed Evidence Summaries on Improving Quality of Prescribing for Patients With Chronic Cardiovascular Disease
2 other identifiers
interventional
160
1 country
1
Brief Summary
BACKGROUND: Although much has been written about the influence of local opinion leaders on clinical practice, there have been few controlled studies of their effect, and almost none have attempted to change prescribing in the community for chronic conditions such as congestive heart failure (CHF) or ischemic heart disease (IHD). These two conditions are common and there is very good evidence about how to best prevent morbidity and mortality - and very good evidence that quality of care is, in general, suboptimal. Practice audits have demonstrated that about half of eligible CHF patients are prescribed ACE inhibitors (and fewer still reaching appropriate target doses) and less than one-third of patients with established IHD are prescribed statins (with many fewer reaching recommended cholesterol targets). It is apparent that interventions to improve quality of prescribing are urgently needed. HYPOTHESIS: An intervention that consists of patient-specific one-page evidence summaries, generated and then endorsed by local opinion leaders, will be able to change prescribing practices of community-based primary care physicians. DESIGN: A single centre randomized controlled trial comparing an opinion leader intervention to usual care. Based on random allocation of all physicians in one large Canadian health region, patients with CHF or IHD (not receiving ACE inhibitors or statins, respectively) recruited from community pharmacies will be allocated to intervention or usual care. The primary outcome is improvement in prescription of proven efficacious therapies for CHF (ACE inhibitors) or IHD (statins) within 6 months of the intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2002
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2002
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 10, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 15, 2005
CompletedMay 10, 2011
May 1, 2011
September 10, 2005
May 9, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary outcome measure will be the "improvement" of prescribing for efficacious therapies in patients with a chronic cardiovascular disease within six months of the intervention.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
1. Condition-specific "improvement" in prescribing after 6 months.
2. "Optimization" of dosage for each of the medications prescribed (i.e., ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers and statins).
3. Patient adherence
4. Subgroup analyses based on condition, age, and sex.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with HF or IHD who are not currently taking the study medications of interest (ACE inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers for HF or statins for IHD) and whose primary care physicians are part of the study population
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are unable or unwilling to give informed consent,
- previously taken the study medications according to dispensing records
- allergy or intolerance to study medications
- residents of long-term care facilities
- unable to confirm a diagnosis of either HF or IHD
- primary care physician has already contributed 5 patients to the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Albertalead
- Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Researchcollaborator
- Institute of Health Economics, Canadacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Majumdar SR, McAlister FA, Tsuyuki RT. A cluster randomized trial to assess the impact of opinion leader endorsed evidence summaries on improving quality of prescribing for patients with chronic cardiovascular disease: rationale and design [ISRCTN26365328]. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2005 Jun 27;5(1):17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-5-17.
PMID: 15982421BACKGROUNDMajumdar SR, Tsuyuki RT, McAlister FA. Impact of opinion leader-endorsed evidence summaries on the quality of prescribing for patients with cardiovascular disease: a randomized controlled trial. Am Heart J. 2007 Jan;153(1):22.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.07.030.
PMID: 17174632RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sumit R Majumdar, MD, MPH
University of Alberta
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 10, 2005
First Posted
September 15, 2005
Study Start
January 1, 2002
Study Completion
April 1, 2005
Last Updated
May 10, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-05