Study Stopped
See termination reason in detailed description.
Prevention of Growth Retardation by Early Treatment With Growth Hormone (GH) in Children With CJA Treated by Corticosteroid Therapy
Prevention of Retarded Growth by Early Treatment With Recombinant Human Growth Factor Genotonorm (Registered) in Children With Systemic Forms of Chronic Juvenile Arthritis Receiving Long-term Corticosteroid Therapy. Extension of the Study Beyond Three Years
2 other identifiers
interventional
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
- To evaluate the effect of increasing the growth hormone dose on the statural response
- To assess the value of early treatment during the course of arthritic disease by comparing the height acquired in the medium term by children in the two groups: treated from the start, or 1 year to 15 months after the diagnosis of CJA, or treated for 4 years after the diagnosis
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Mar 2002
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2002
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 9, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 15, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 4, 2012
CompletedDecember 4, 2012
October 1, 2012
9.6 years
September 9, 2005
October 26, 2012
October 26, 2012
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Change From Baseline in Annual Rate of Growth Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Year 3
Annual rate of growth SDS was obtained by measuring the annual growth rate, subtracting chronological age- and gender-appropriate mean annual growth rate and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from chronological age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.
Baseline, Year 3
Change From Baseline in Annual Rate of Growth Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Final Height
Annual rate of growth SDS was obtained by measuring the annual growth rate, subtracting chronological age- and gender-appropriate mean annual growth rate and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from chronological age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.
Baseline, final height (assessed up to Year 9.5)
Change From Baseline in Height Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Year 3
Height was measured using a wall mounted device (example, Harpenden stadiometer). Height SDS was obtained by measuring the height, subtracting chronological age- and gender-appropriate mean height and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from chronological age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.
Baseline, Year 3
Change From Baseline in Height Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Final Height
Height was measured using a wall mounted device (example, Harpenden stadiometer). Height SDS was obtained by measuring the height, subtracting chronological age- and gender-appropriate mean height and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from chronological age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.
Baseline, final height (assessed up to Year 9.5)
Change From Baseline in Predicted Height Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Year 3
Predicted height was calculated according to Greulich and Pyle using Bayley Pinneau method. Predicted height SDS was obtained by calculating the predicted height, subtracting chronological age- and gender-appropriate mean predicted height and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from chronological age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.
Baseline, Year 3
Change From Baseline in Predicted Height Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Final Height
Predicted height was calculated according to Greulich and Pyle using Bayley Pinneau method. Predicted height SDS was obtained by calculating the predicted height, subtracting chronological age- and gender-appropriate mean predicted height and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from chronological age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.
Baseline, final height (assessed up to Year 9.5)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Change From Baseline in Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) Concentration at Year 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5 and 9
Baseline, Year 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9
Change From Baseline in Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3 (IGFBP3) Concentration at Year 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5 and 9
Baseline, Year 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9
Change From Baseline in Lean Mass and Fat Mass at Year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9
Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineralization at Year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9
Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Change From Baseline in Weight Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Year 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5 and 9
Baseline, Year 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Somatropin
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- This study will be proposed to all patients previously included in study CTN 97-8129-016
You may not qualify if:
- Discontinuation of corticosteroid therapy for more than a year during study CTN 97-8129-016
- Patients withdrawing from the study prematurely
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Pfizerlead
Study Sites (1)
Pfizer Investigational Site
Paris, 75019, France
Related Publications (1)
David H, Aupiais C, Louveau B, Quartier P, Jacqz-Aigrain E, Carel JC, Simon D. Growth Outcomes After GH Therapy of Patients Given Long-Term Corticosteroids for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Dec 1;102(12):4578-4587. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-01455.
PMID: 29029101DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Data for bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral content (BMC) and IGFBP3 were not analyzed because of change in planned analysis after the study was prematurely terminated due to Good Clinical Practice (GCP) non-compliance issues.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
- Organization
- Pfizer, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Pfizer
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 9, 2005
First Posted
September 15, 2005
Study Start
March 1, 2002
Primary Completion
October 1, 2011
Study Completion
October 1, 2011
Last Updated
December 4, 2012
Results First Posted
December 4, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-10