NCT00174291

Brief Summary

  • To evaluate the effect of increasing the growth hormone dose on the statural response
  • To assess the value of early treatment during the course of arthritic disease by comparing the height acquired in the medium term by children in the two groups: treated from the start, or 1 year to 15 months after the diagnosis of CJA, or treated for 4 years after the diagnosis

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
21

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2002

Longer than P75 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2002

Completed
3.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 9, 2005

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 15, 2005

Completed
6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2011

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 4, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

December 4, 2012

Status Verified

October 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

9.6 years

First QC Date

September 9, 2005

Results QC Date

October 26, 2012

Last Update Submit

October 26, 2012

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Change From Baseline in Annual Rate of Growth Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Year 3

    Annual rate of growth SDS was obtained by measuring the annual growth rate, subtracting chronological age- and gender-appropriate mean annual growth rate and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from chronological age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.

    Baseline, Year 3

  • Change From Baseline in Annual Rate of Growth Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Final Height

    Annual rate of growth SDS was obtained by measuring the annual growth rate, subtracting chronological age- and gender-appropriate mean annual growth rate and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from chronological age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.

    Baseline, final height (assessed up to Year 9.5)

  • Change From Baseline in Height Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Year 3

    Height was measured using a wall mounted device (example, Harpenden stadiometer). Height SDS was obtained by measuring the height, subtracting chronological age- and gender-appropriate mean height and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from chronological age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.

    Baseline, Year 3

  • Change From Baseline in Height Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Final Height

    Height was measured using a wall mounted device (example, Harpenden stadiometer). Height SDS was obtained by measuring the height, subtracting chronological age- and gender-appropriate mean height and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from chronological age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.

    Baseline, final height (assessed up to Year 9.5)

  • Change From Baseline in Predicted Height Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Year 3

    Predicted height was calculated according to Greulich and Pyle using Bayley Pinneau method. Predicted height SDS was obtained by calculating the predicted height, subtracting chronological age- and gender-appropriate mean predicted height and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from chronological age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.

    Baseline, Year 3

  • Change From Baseline in Predicted Height Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Final Height

    Predicted height was calculated according to Greulich and Pyle using Bayley Pinneau method. Predicted height SDS was obtained by calculating the predicted height, subtracting chronological age- and gender-appropriate mean predicted height and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from chronological age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.

    Baseline, final height (assessed up to Year 9.5)

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Change From Baseline in Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) Concentration at Year 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5 and 9

    Baseline, Year 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9

  • Change From Baseline in Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3 (IGFBP3) Concentration at Year 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5 and 9

    Baseline, Year 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9

  • Change From Baseline in Lean Mass and Fat Mass at Year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9

    Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

  • Change From Baseline in Bone Mineralization at Year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9

    Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

  • Change From Baseline in Weight Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Year 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5 and 9

    Baseline, Year 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Somatropin

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Somatropin

Interventions

Liquid, daily to final height Maximum Dosage: 50 µg/kg/day

Somatropin

Eligibility Criteria

Age4 Years - 14 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • This study will be proposed to all patients previously included in study CTN 97-8129-016

You may not qualify if:

  • Discontinuation of corticosteroid therapy for more than a year during study CTN 97-8129-016
  • Patients withdrawing from the study prematurely

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Pfizer Investigational Site

Paris, 75019, France

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • David H, Aupiais C, Louveau B, Quartier P, Jacqz-Aigrain E, Carel JC, Simon D. Growth Outcomes After GH Therapy of Patients Given Long-Term Corticosteroids for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Dec 1;102(12):4578-4587. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-01455.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Endocrine System Diseases

Interventions

Human Growth Hormone

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Growth HormonePituitary Hormones, AnteriorPituitary HormonesPeptide HormonesHormonesHormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone AntagonistsPeptidesAmino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins

Limitations and Caveats

Data for bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral content (BMC) and IGFBP3 were not analyzed because of change in planned analysis after the study was prematurely terminated due to Good Clinical Practice (GCP) non-compliance issues.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
Organization
Pfizer, Inc.

Study Officials

  • Pfizer CT.gov Call Center

    Pfizer

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2005

First Posted

September 15, 2005

Study Start

March 1, 2002

Primary Completion

October 1, 2011

Study Completion

October 1, 2011

Last Updated

December 4, 2012

Results First Posted

December 4, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-10

Locations