Study Stopped
See termination reason in detailed description.
Treatment With Recombinant Human Growth Hormone (GH) in Children With Short Stature Secondary to a Long Term Corticoid Therapy
2 other identifiers
interventional
30
1 country
2
Brief Summary
- To assess the effect of a long-term treatment by Genotonorm on linear growth in children with short stature receiving steroid therapy
- To assess the effect of a long term treatment with Genotonorm on bone mineralisation
- To assess the effect of a long term treatment with Genotonorm on body composition
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Sep 2000
Longer than P75 for phase_3
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2000
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 9, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 15, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 4, 2012
CompletedDecember 4, 2012
November 1, 2012
11 years
September 9, 2005
September 11, 2012
November 5, 2012
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change From Baseline in Height Standard Deviation Score According to Chronological Age (SDS/CA) at Year 3
Height was measured using a wall mounted device (example, Harpenden stadiometer). Height SDS/CA was obtained by measuring the height, subtracting chronological age- and gender-appropriate mean height and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from chronological age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.
Baseline, Year 3
Change From Baseline in Height Standard Deviation Score According to Chronological Age (SDS/CA) at Final Height
Height was measured using a wall mounted device (example, Harpenden stadiometer). Height SDS/CA was obtained by measuring the height, subtracting chronological age- and gender-appropriate mean height and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from chronological age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.
Baseline, when final height was reached (assessed up to Year 11)
Change From Baseline in Weight Standard Deviation Score (SDS) at Final Height
Body weight was measured using a balance scale. Weight SDS was obtained by measuring the weight, subtracting age- and gender-appropriate mean weight and dividing the result by standard deviation of that mean (as obtained from age- and gender-specific population reference data). SDS indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive SDS) or lower (in case of negative SDS) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.
Baseline, when final height was reached (assessed up to Year 11)
Puberty Stage at Final Height
Pubertal stage (graded from I to V for breast development and pubic hair development) according to the Tanner's method was collected. A low stage (Stage I) corresponds to a pre-pubertal stage and a high stage (Stage V) to an adult stage.
When final height was reached (assessed up to Year 11)
Secondary Outcomes (21)
Bone Age
Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
Lean Body Mass
Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
Annual Percent Change in Lean Body Mass at Year 1, 2 and 3
Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3
Percent Change From Baseline in Lean Body Mass at Year 3
Baseline, Year 3
Lean Body Mass as Percentage of Total Weight
Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- +16 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (5)
Growth Velocity (GV)
Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
Growth Velocity Standard Deviation Score According to Chronological Age (GV [SDS/CA])
Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
Growth Velocity Standard Deviation Score According to Bone Age (GV [SDS/BA])
Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Somatropin
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
liquid, daily, until final height Dosage: 0,46 mg/kg/week . The maximum dose should not exceed 50 µg/Kg/day
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children with juvenile arthritis or nephrotic syndrome
- Before or during puberty
You may not qualify if:
- Diabetes Type 1 and 2
- Endocrine disease, except well substituted hypothyroidism
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Pfizerlead
Study Sites (2)
Pfizer Investigational Site
Paris, 75019, France
Pfizer Investigational Site
Paris, 75743, France
Related Publications (1)
David H, Aupiais C, Louveau B, Quartier P, Jacqz-Aigrain E, Carel JC, Simon D. Growth Outcomes After GH Therapy of Patients Given Long-Term Corticosteroids for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Dec 1;102(12):4578-4587. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-01455.
PMID: 29029101DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Results for secondary and other pre-specified endpoints (except IGF-1) are reported for only up to 3 years because data beyond Year 3 was not summarized as the study was terminated due to Good Clinical Practice (GCP) non-compliance issues.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
- Organization
- Pfizer, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Pfizer
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 9, 2005
First Posted
September 15, 2005
Study Start
September 1, 2000
Primary Completion
September 1, 2011
Study Completion
September 1, 2011
Last Updated
December 4, 2012
Results First Posted
December 4, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-11