A Trial of the Use of Ultrasound to Aid the Insertion of Combined Spinal Epidural Anaesthesia
The Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Ultrasound Probe to Guide the Insertion of Central Regional Anaesthesia Using a Regional Anaesthetic Needle Modified to Aid Insertion Under Ultrasound Guidance in Morbidly Obese Women Undergoing Elective Caesarean Section
2 other identifiers
interventional
42
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The study will establish whether the use of ultrasound scanning with a purpose built probe will aid the insertion of the needles for epidural and spinal anaesthesia for obese women undergoing elective caesarean section The study group will be 46 obese women (defined by the ratio of height to weight) at time of initial booking ultrasound scan, undergoing routine caesarean section with no serious illnesses that are both willing and able to provide informed consent prior to spinal epidural anaesthesia. Patients will be excluded if they have signs or symptoms of systemic or local infection, if they have a history of previous spinal surgery, a blood clotting abnormities. In order to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the ultrasound probe a randomised comparison of the traditional clinical methods of feeling the bones of the spine and ultrasound guided insertion of a combined spinal epidural anaesthetic will be undertaken. The rodiera tiped 17/18G 90mm tuohy needle and 123mm 27G spinal needle manufactured by Sarstedt will be the regional needles used for the combined spinal epidural anaesthetic. Randomisation into two groups (ultrasound guided needle insertion and feeling the bones) will be by computer generated random sequence. This information will be recorded in sealed envelopes and placed in the ward. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria and who consent immediately prior to caesarean section will be sequentially assigned a number that will correspond to a sealed envelope. The main aim of the study will be to detect any difference in time taken to insert epidural catheter via the needle in the patients back. The other factors measured will be the number of times the skin is punctured and bone touched by the needle, number of conversions from regional (spinal epidural) to general anaesthesia, patient satisfaction scores, requirement for extra local anaesthetic following initial blockade during Caesarean section. The factors will be compared by student t-test using Statistica6 (StatSoft,Inc.(2001). STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 6. www.statsoft.com). A population of 46 patients will be required assuming a mean time for inserting a combined spinal epidural without
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3 obesity
Started Sep 2005
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 9, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 14, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2007
CompletedJune 11, 2008
June 1, 2008
2 years
September 9, 2005
June 10, 2008
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary end point will be time taken to insert an epidural catheter.
During the c-section
Secondary Outcomes (8)
The number of times the skin is punctured
anaesthesia induction
The number of times the cortex of bone touched by the epidural needle
anaesthesia induction
The number of conversions from regional (central-neuraxial) to general anaesthesia
anaesthesia induction
Patient satisfaction scores immediately post op and at 30 minutes post op
30mins post operatively
The volume and concentration of supplementary local anaesthetic administration following primary spinal blockade during caesarean section
intraoperatively
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Palpation
NO INTERVENTIONUse of palpation to guide the the insertion site of combined spinal epidural needle in obese parturients
ultrasound
EXPERIMENTALThe use of ultrasound to guide the insertion of a combined spinal epidural needle
Interventions
The use of ultrasound to guide the insertion of combined spinal epidural needle
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Elective Caesarean section \> 38/52 gestation
- BMI at booking scan (circia 13/52 gestation)\>=35
- ASA = 1,2 or 3 patients only
You may not qualify if:
- Abnormal clotting screen (coagulopathy) or thrombocytopenia ( \< 100,000)
- Unable to give informed consent to combined spinal epidural anaesthesia
- Previous spinal surgery or known spinal pathology
- Signs, symptoms or laboratory evidence of local infection or systemic sepsis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Princess Royal maternity
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
Queen mother's maternity
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
Southern general maternity hospital
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
Paisley maternity hospital
Paisley, Scotland, United Kingdom
Wishaw Maternity hospital
Wishaw, Scotland, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
malcolm J watson, MBCHB
North Glasgow University Hospitals Division
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 9, 2005
First Posted
September 14, 2005
Study Start
September 1, 2005
Primary Completion
September 1, 2007
Study Completion
September 1, 2007
Last Updated
June 11, 2008
Record last verified: 2008-06