NCT00166699

Brief Summary

The study will establish whether the use of ultrasound scanning with a purpose built probe will aid the insertion of the needles for epidural and spinal anaesthesia for obese women undergoing elective caesarean section The study group will be 46 obese women (defined by the ratio of height to weight) at time of initial booking ultrasound scan, undergoing routine caesarean section with no serious illnesses that are both willing and able to provide informed consent prior to spinal epidural anaesthesia. Patients will be excluded if they have signs or symptoms of systemic or local infection, if they have a history of previous spinal surgery, a blood clotting abnormities. In order to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the ultrasound probe a randomised comparison of the traditional clinical methods of feeling the bones of the spine and ultrasound guided insertion of a combined spinal epidural anaesthetic will be undertaken. The rodiera tiped 17/18G 90mm tuohy needle and 123mm 27G spinal needle manufactured by Sarstedt will be the regional needles used for the combined spinal epidural anaesthetic. Randomisation into two groups (ultrasound guided needle insertion and feeling the bones) will be by computer generated random sequence. This information will be recorded in sealed envelopes and placed in the ward. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria and who consent immediately prior to caesarean section will be sequentially assigned a number that will correspond to a sealed envelope. The main aim of the study will be to detect any difference in time taken to insert epidural catheter via the needle in the patients back. The other factors measured will be the number of times the skin is punctured and bone touched by the needle, number of conversions from regional (spinal epidural) to general anaesthesia, patient satisfaction scores, requirement for extra local anaesthetic following initial blockade during Caesarean section. The factors will be compared by student t-test using Statistica6 (StatSoft,Inc.(2001). STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 6. www.statsoft.com). A population of 46 patients will be required assuming a mean time for inserting a combined spinal epidural without

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
42

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3 obesity

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2005

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2005

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 9, 2005

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 14, 2005

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2007

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2007

Completed
Last Updated

June 11, 2008

Status Verified

June 1, 2008

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

September 9, 2005

Last Update Submit

June 10, 2008

Conditions

Keywords

ultrasonographyobesityCesarean SectionAnesthesiaEpidural

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The primary end point will be time taken to insert an epidural catheter.

    During the c-section

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • The number of times the skin is punctured

    anaesthesia induction

  • The number of times the cortex of bone touched by the epidural needle

    anaesthesia induction

  • The number of conversions from regional (central-neuraxial) to general anaesthesia

    anaesthesia induction

  • Patient satisfaction scores immediately post op and at 30 minutes post op

    30mins post operatively

  • The volume and concentration of supplementary local anaesthetic administration following primary spinal blockade during caesarean section

    intraoperatively

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Palpation

NO INTERVENTION

Use of palpation to guide the the insertion site of combined spinal epidural needle in obese parturients

ultrasound

EXPERIMENTAL

The use of ultrasound to guide the insertion of a combined spinal epidural needle

Procedure: ultrasound

Interventions

ultrasoundPROCEDURE

The use of ultrasound to guide the insertion of combined spinal epidural needle

Also known as: Split array transducer
ultrasound

Eligibility Criteria

Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Elective Caesarean section \> 38/52 gestation
  • BMI at booking scan (circia 13/52 gestation)\>=35
  • ASA = 1,2 or 3 patients only

You may not qualify if:

  • Abnormal clotting screen (coagulopathy) or thrombocytopenia ( \< 100,000)
  • Unable to give informed consent to combined spinal epidural anaesthesia
  • Previous spinal surgery or known spinal pathology
  • Signs, symptoms or laboratory evidence of local infection or systemic sepsis

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

Princess Royal maternity

Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom

Location

Queen mother's maternity

Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom

Location

Southern general maternity hospital

Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom

Location

Paisley maternity hospital

Paisley, Scotland, United Kingdom

Location

Wishaw Maternity hospital

Wishaw, Scotland, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Obesity

Interventions

High-Energy Shock Waves

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OverweightOvernutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBody WeightSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ultrasonic WavesSoundRadiation, NonionizingRadiationPhysical Phenomena

Study Officials

  • malcolm J watson, MBCHB

    North Glasgow University Hospitals Division

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2005

First Posted

September 14, 2005

Study Start

September 1, 2005

Primary Completion

September 1, 2007

Study Completion

September 1, 2007

Last Updated

June 11, 2008

Record last verified: 2008-06

Locations