NCT00160602

Brief Summary

A 24 week study in which patients are given study medication and assessed for signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis. X-rays are performed to assess the progress of joint damage during the study.

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
590

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3 rheumatoid-arthritis

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2005

Shorter than P25 for phase_3 rheumatoid-arthritis

Geographic Reach
15 countries

70 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2005

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 8, 2005

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 12, 2005

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2006

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2006

Completed
Last Updated

December 1, 2020

Status Verified

November 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

September 8, 2005

Last Update Submit

November 26, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Rheumatoid ArthritisCertolizumab Pegol, Cimzia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Compare efficacy of two dose regimens of certolizumab pegol in combination with MTX to MTX alone in patients with RA measured by the ACR20 at week 24.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Assess Safety and Tolerability of two dose regimens of certolizumab pegol in combination with MTX and MTX alone in patients with RA; prevention of joint damage in patients with RA; Health Outcomes Measures

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients must be at least 18 years old at the screening visit.
  • Patients must have a diagnosis of adult-onset RA of at least six months duration but not longer than fifteen years as defined by the 1987 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria.
  • Patients must have active RA disease as defined by:
  • tender joints at Screening and Baseline.
  • swollen joints at Screening and Baseline. and fulfilling 1 of the following 2 criteria during the screening period:
  • mm/hour ESR (Westergren), or CRP \>15 mg/L.
  • Patients must have received treatment with MTX (with or without folic acid) for at least 6 months prior to the Baseline visit. The dose of MTX and route of administration must have been stable for at least 2 months prior to the baseline visit. The minimum stable dose of MTX allowed is 10 mg weekly.
  • Patients must be willing to complete an X-ray of the hands and feet 24 weeks after randomization even if they are no longer receiving study treatment in the present study, provided they have not withdrawn their informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients must not have a diagnosis of any other inflammatory arthritis (e.g., psoriatic arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis).
  • Patients must not have a secondary, non-inflammatory type of arthritis (e.g. OA or fibromyalgia)
  • Female patients who are breast feeding, pregnant, or plan to become pregnant during the trial or for three months following last dose of study drug.
  • Patients with a history of tuberculosis or positive chest X-ray for tuberculosis or positive
  • Patients at a high risk of infection (e.g. leg ulcers, indwelling urinary catheter and persistent or recurrent chest infections and patients who are permanently bed ridden or wheelchair bound).
  • Patients with known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
  • Patients with an active malignancy of any type or a history of malignancy (except basal cell carcinoma of the skin that has been excised prior to study start).
  • Patients with a current or recent history, as determined by the Investigator, of severe, progressive, and/or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, cardiac, neurological, or cerebral disease which would interfere with the patient's participation in the trial.
  • Patients with a history of, or suspected, demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (e.g. multiple sclerosis or optic neuritis).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (70)

Unknown Facility

Montgomery, Alabama, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Sun City West, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Palm Desert, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Pasadena, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Santa Maria, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Naples, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Palm Harbor, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

South Miami, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Stratford, New Jersey, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New York, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Rochester, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Canfield, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Pleven, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Sofia, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Stara Zagora, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Santiago, Chile

Location

Unknown Facility

Temuco, Chile

Location

Unknown Facility

Rijeka, Croatia

Location

Unknown Facility

Brno, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Hlučín, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Ostrava-Poruba, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Prague, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Sokolov, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

UherskeHradiste, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Zlín, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Tallinn, Estonia

Location

Unknown Facility

Afula, Israel

Location

Unknown Facility

Ashkelon, Israel

Location

Unknown Facility

Beer Yaakov, Israel

Location

Unknown Facility

Haifa, Israel

Location

Unknown Facility

Jerusalem, Israel

Location

Unknown Facility

Ramat Gan, Israel

Location

Unknown Facility

Rehovot, Israel

Location

Unknown Facility

Daugavpils, Latvia

Location

Unknown Facility

Riga, Latvia

Location

Unknown Facility

Alytus, Lithuania

Location

Unknown Facility

Kaunas, Lithuania

Location

Unknown Facility

Klaipėda, Lithuania

Location

Unknown Facility

Panevezys, Lithuania

Location

Unknown Facility

Šiauliai, Lithuania

Location

Unknown Facility

D. F., Mexico

Location

Unknown Facility

Mexicalli, Mexico

Location

Unknown Facility

México, Mexico

Location

Unknown Facility

Monterrey, Mexico

Location

Unknown Facility

Tijuana, Mexico

Location

Unknown Facility

Bialystok, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Elblag, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Krakow, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Lublin, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Sopot, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Torun, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Moscow, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Saint Petersburg, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Yaroslavl, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Belgrade, Serbia

Location

Unknown Facility

Niška Banja, Serbia

Location

Unknown Facility

Novi Sad, Serbia

Location

Unknown Facility

Košice, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Piešťany, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Dnipro, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Donetsk, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Kiev, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Simferopol, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Zaporizhzhya, Ukraine

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Smolen J, Landewe RB, Mease P, Brzezicki J, Mason D, Luijtens K, van Vollenhoven RF, Kavanaugh A, Schiff M, Burmester GR, Strand V, Vencovsky J, van der Heijde D. Efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol plus methotrexate in active rheumatoid arthritis: the RAPID 2 study. A randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jun;68(6):797-804. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.101659. Epub 2008 Nov 17.

  • Strand V, Smolen JS, van Vollenhoven RF, Mease P, Burmester GR, Hiepe F, Khanna D, Nikai E, Coteur G, Schiff M. Certolizumab pegol plus methotrexate provides broad relief from the burden of rheumatoid arthritis: analysis of patient-reported outcomes from the RAPID 2 trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jun;70(6):996-1002. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.143586. Epub 2011 Mar 17.

  • Hazes JM, Taylor P, Strand V, Purcaru O, Coteur G, Mease P. Physical function improvements and relief from fatigue and pain are associated with increased productivity at work and at home in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with certolizumab pegol. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 Oct;49(10):1900-10. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq109. Epub 2010 Jun 14.

  • Paul S, Marotte H, Kavanaugh A, Goupille P, Kvien TK, de Longueville M, Mulleman D, Sandborn WJ, Vande Casteele N. Exposure-Response Relationship of Certolizumab Pegol and Achievement of Low Disease Activity and Remission in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jul;13(4):743-751. doi: 10.1111/cts.12760. Epub 2020 Apr 1.

  • Curtis JR, Winthrop K, O'Brien C, Ndlovu MN, de Longueville M, Haraoui B. Use of a baseline risk score to identify the risk of serious infectious events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis during certolizumab pegol treatment. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017 Dec 15;19(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1466-y.

  • Smolen JS, van Vollenhoven R, Kavanaugh A, Strand V, Vencovsky J, Schiff M, Landewe R, Haraoui B, Arendt C, Mountian I, Carter D, van der Heijde D. Certolizumab pegol plus methotrexate 5-year results from the rheumatoid arthritis prevention of structural damage (RAPID) 2 randomized controlled trial and long-term extension in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Sep 10;17(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0767-2.

  • Combe B, Furst DE, Keystone EC, van der Heijde D, Luijtens K, Ionescu L, Goel N, Emery P. Certolizumab Pegol Efficacy Across Methotrexate Regimens: A Pre-Specified Analysis of Two Phase III Trials. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Mar;68(3):299-307. doi: 10.1002/acr.22676.

  • Kavanaugh A, Smolen JS, Emery P, Purcaru O, Keystone E, Richard L, Strand V, van Vollenhoven RF. Effect of certolizumab pegol with methotrexate on home and work place productivity and social activities in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Nov 15;61(11):1592-600. doi: 10.1002/art.24828.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Interventions

Certolizumab Pegol

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesConnective Tissue DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Polyethylene GlycolsPolymersMacromolecular SubstancesImmunoglobulin Fab FragmentsImmunoglobulin FragmentsPeptide FragmentsPeptidesAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodiesImmunoglobulinsImmunoproteinsBlood ProteinsProteinsSerum GlobulinsGlobulins

Study Officials

  • UCB Clinical Trial Call Center

    UCB Pharma

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2005

First Posted

September 12, 2005

Study Start

June 1, 2005

Primary Completion

September 1, 2006

Study Completion

September 1, 2006

Last Updated

December 1, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-11

Locations