NCT00152763

Brief Summary

About 30% of patients survive a cardiac arrest, and the majority of these receive an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) for prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). While ICD therapy offers survival benefit over drug therapy, there remain significant quality of life (QL) issues. About 50% of patients experience chronic anxiety about receiving an ICD shock. Anxiety and depression in turn appear to predispose to more arrhythmias necessitating ICD therapy. The aims of the current study are:

  1. 1.to evaluate a 8-session psychosocial intervention to help patients cope effectively with receiving an ICD for secondary prevention of SCD,
  2. 2.to determine if baseline measures of depression and anxiety predict ICD therapies (i.e., anti-tachycardia pace terminations and shocks); and
  3. 3.to explore if the psychosocial intervention results in less need for appropriate ICD therapies.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
193

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 anxiety

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2003

Longer than P75 for phase_3 anxiety

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2003

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 7, 2005

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 9, 2005

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2007

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2007

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 28, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

January 28, 2011

Status Verified

January 1, 2011

Enrollment Period

3.9 years

First QC Date

September 7, 2005

Results QC Date

October 27, 2010

Last Update Submit

January 5, 2011

Conditions

Keywords

health anxiety

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (21)

  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Depression Scale at Baseline

    Psychometric scale measuring symptoms of depression, score range is 0 to 24. Scores \>= 8 represent clinically elevated scores. Higher scores represent greater depressive symptoms.

    Baseline

  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Depression Scale at 6-months Follow-up

    Psychometric scale measuring symptoms of depression, score range is 0 to 24. Scores \>= 8 represent clinically elevated scores. Higher scores represent greater depressive symptoms.

    Six-months follow-up

  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Depression Scale at 12-months Follow-up

    Psychometric scale measuring symptoms of depression, score range is 0 to 24. Scores \>= 8 represent clinically elevated scores. Higher scores represent greater depressive symptoms.

    Twelve-months follow-up

  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety Scale at Baseline

    Psychometric scale measuring symptoms of anxiety,score range is 0 to 24. Scores \>= 8 represent clinically elevated scores. Higher scores represent greater anxiety symptoms.

    Baseline

  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety Scale at 6-months Follow-up

    Psychometric scale measuring symptoms of anxiety,score range is 0 to 24. Scores \>= 8 represent clinically elevated scores. Higher scores represent greater anxiety symptoms.

    Six-months follow-up

  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety Scale at 12-months Follow-up

    Psychometric scale measuring symptoms of anxiety,score range is 0 to 24. Scores \>= 8 represent clinically elevated scores. Higher scores represent greater anxiety symptoms.

    Twelve-months follow-up

  • Impact of Events Scale-Revised - Total Score at Baseline

    Psychometric measure of post traumatic stress disorder symptoms, scores range from 0 to 4. A score threshold of 1.4 has been found to diagnostic of post traumatic stress disorder in war veterans. Higher scores represent greater total post traumatic stress disorder symptoms.

    Baseline

  • Impact of Events Scale-Revised - Total Score at 6-months Follow-up

    Psychometric measure of post traumatic stress disorder symptoms, scores range from 0 to 4. A score threshold of 1.4 has been found to diagnostic of post traumatic stress disorder in war veterans. Higher scores represent greater total post traumatic stress disorder symptoms.

    Six-months follow-up

  • Impact of Events Scale-Revised - Total Score at 12-months Follow-up

    Psychometric measure of post traumatic stress disorder symptoms, scores range from 0 to 4. A score threshold of 1.4 has been found to diagnostic of post traumatic stress disorder in war veterans. Higher scores represent greater total post traumatic stress disorder symptoms.

    Twelve-months follow-up

  • Impact of Events Scale-Revised - Intrusiveness Scale at Baseline

    Psychometric measure of post traumatic stress disorder intrusiveness symptoms, scores range from 0 to 4. Higher scores represent greater post traumatic stress disorder intrusiveness symptoms.

    Baseline

  • Impact of Events Scale-Revised - Intrusiveness Scale at 6-months Follow-up

    Psychometric measure of post traumatic stress disorder intrusiveness symptoms, scores range from 0 to 4. Higher scores represent greater post traumatic stress disorder intrusiveness symptoms.

    Six-months follow-up

  • Impact of Events Scale-Revised - Intrusiveness Scale at 12-months Follow-up

    Psychometric measure of post traumatic stress disorder intrusiveness symptoms, scores range from 0 to 4. Higher scores represent greater post traumatic stress disorder intrusiveness symptoms.

    Twelve-months follow-up

  • Impact of Events Scale-Revised - Avoidance Scale at Baseline

    Psychometric assessment of post traumatic stress disorder avoidance symptoms, scores range from 0 to 4. Higher scores represent greater post traumatic stress disorder avoidance symptoms.

    Baseline

  • Impact of Events Scale-Revised - Avoidance Scale at 6-months Follow-up

    Psychometric assessment of post traumatic stress disorder avoidance symptoms, scores range from 0 to 4. Higher scores represent greater post traumatic stress disorder avoidance symptoms.

    Six-months follow-up

  • Impact of Events Scale-Revised - Avoidance Scale at 12-months Follow-up

    Psychometric assessment of post traumatic stress disorder avoidance symptoms, scores range from 0 to 4. Higher scores represent greater post traumatic stress disorder avoidance symptoms.

    Twelve-months follow-up

  • Impact of Event Scale-Revised Hyperarousal Scale at Baseline

    Psychometric measure of post traumatic stress disorder hyper-arousal symptoms, scores range from 0 to 4. Higher scores represent greater post traumatic stress disorder hyperarousal symptoms.

    Baseline

  • Impact of Event Scale-Revised Hyperarousal Scale at 6-months Follow-up

    Psychometric measure of post traumatic stress disorder hyper-arousal symptoms, scores range from 0 to 4. Higher scores represent greater post traumatic stress disorder hyperarousal symptoms.

    Six-months follow-up

  • Impact of Event Scale-Revised Hyperarousal Scale at 12-months Follow-up

    Psychometric measure of post traumatic stress disorder hyper-arousal symptoms, scores range from 0 to 4. Higher scores represent greater post traumatic stress disorder hyperarousal symptoms.

    Twelve-months follow-up

  • Crown-Crisp Experiential Index - Phobic Anxiety Scale at Baseline

    Psychometric measure of phobic anxiety, scores range from 1 to 3. Higher scores represent greater phobic anxiety symptoms.

    Baseline

  • Crown-Crisp Experiential Index - Phobic Anxiety Scale at 6-months Follow-up

    Psychometric measure of phobic anxiety, scores range from 1 to 3. Higher scores represent greater phobic anxiety symptoms.

    Six-months follow-up

  • Crown-Crisp Experiential Index - Phobic Anxiety Scale at 12-months Follow-up

    Psychometric measure of phobic anxiety, scores range from 1 to 3. Higher scores represent greater phobic anxiety symptoms.

    Twelve-months follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • SF-36 Mental Component Summary Scale at Baseline

    Baseline

  • SF-36 Mental Component Summary Scale at 6-months Follow-up

    Six-months follow-up

  • SF-36 Mental Component Summary Scale at 12-months Follow-up

    Twelve-months follow-up

  • SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score at Baseline

    Baseline

  • SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score at 6-months Follow-up

    Six-months follow-up

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (4)

Cognitive Behavior Therapy - males

EXPERIMENTAL

Eight telephone sessions of cognitive behavior therapy tailored to psychological adaptation to an ICD, plus a psycho-educational booklet for participants and a therapist manual. This arm included the males.

Behavioral: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT)

Cognitive Behavior Therapy - females

EXPERIMENTAL

Eight telephone sessions of cognitive behavior therapy tailored to psychological adaptation to an ICD, plus a psycho-educational booklet for participants and a therapist manual. This arm included the females.

Behavioral: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT)

Usual Cardiac Care - Males

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The UCC was defined as whatever the respective ICD treatment sites routinely offer their patients. All patients received standard educational materials explaining their heart disease and the ICD device. Follow-up appointments include device interrogation (i.e., to extract arrhythmia events and ICD therapies) and trouble-shooting at 6-months intervals, cardiac care as necessary, and nonsystematic supportive reassurance delivered informally in the clinic. Each centre also had access to a cardiac rehabilitation program and psychiatric consultation as needed. This arm was just for males randomized.

Other: Usual Cardiac Care (UCC)

Usual Cardiac Care - females

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The UCC was defined as whatever the respective ICD treatment sites routinely offer their patients. All patients received standard educational materials explaining their heart disease and the ICD device. Follow-up appointments include device interrogation (i.e., to extract arrhythmia events and ICD therapies) and trouble-shooting at 6-months intervals, cardiac care as necessary, and nonsystematic supportive reassurance delivered informally in the clinic. Each centre also had access to a cardiac rehabilitation program and psychiatric consultation as needed. This arm was for females randomized.

Other: Usual Cardiac Care (UCC)

Interventions

Cognitive behavior therapy tailored to psychological adaptation to an ICD, included 8 telephone counselling sessions, plus psycho-educational booklet and a therapist manual.

Cognitive Behavior Therapy - femalesCognitive Behavior Therapy - males

Usual cardiac care (UCC) was defined as whatever the respective ICD treatment sites routinely offer their patients. All patients received standard educational materials explaining their heart disease and the ICD device. Follow-up appointments include device interrogation (i.e., to extract arrhythmia events and ICD therapies) and trouble-shooting at 6-months intervals, cardiac care as necessary, and nonsystematic supportive reassurance delivered informally in the clinic. Each centre also had access to a cardiac rehabilitation program and psychiatric consultation as needed.

Usual Cardiac Care - MalesUsual Cardiac Care - females

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients from either Toronto General hospital or St. Michael's Hospital who have coronary heart disease,
  • Receiving their first ICD implant for secondary prevention of SCD or for primary prevention of SCD and their underlying heart disease was hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

You may not qualify if:

  • Not able to read or understand English;
  • Evidence of psychosis, dementia or cognitive impairment as documented in the patients' hospital records;
  • Receiving an ICD for primary prevention of ICD.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Toronto General Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Irvine, J. Stanley, J., Ong, L., Cribbie, R., Ritvo, P., Katz, J., Dorian, P., O'Donnell, S., Harris, L., Cameron, D., Hill, A., Newman, D., Johnson, S. N., Bilanovic, A. Sears, S F. Acceptability of a Cognitive Behavior Therapy Intervention to Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Recipients, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 2010; 24(4) (November), 243-264.

    BACKGROUND
  • Ford J, Rosman L, Wuensch K, Irvine J, Sears SF. Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Trauma Stress. 2016 Aug;29(4):388-92. doi: 10.1002/jts.22111. Epub 2016 Jul 14.

  • Irvine J, Firestone J, Ong L, Cribbie R, Dorian P, Harris L, Ritvo P, Katz J, Newman D, Cameron D, Johnson S, Bilanovic A, Hill A, O'Donnell S, Sears S Jr. A randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavior therapy tailored to psychological adaptation to an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Psychosom Med. 2011 Apr;73(3):226-33. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31820afc63. Epub 2011 Feb 14.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Anxiety DisordersDepression

Interventions

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mental DisordersBehavioral SymptomsBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior TherapyPsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and Activities

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Jane Irvine
Organization
University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital

Study Officials

  • Jane Irvine, D.Phil.

    University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2005

First Posted

September 9, 2005

Study Start

October 1, 2003

Primary Completion

September 1, 2007

Study Completion

November 1, 2007

Last Updated

January 28, 2011

Results First Posted

January 28, 2011

Record last verified: 2011-01

Locations