Phenytoin as an Augmentation for SSRI Failures
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
2
Brief Summary
About two-thirds of depressed patients respond to a standard course of serotonin specific reuptake inhibitor (SSRI's) within 3-4 weeks. While some clinicians advise continued watchful waiting after this time or switch to a different reuptake-blocker based antidepressant, result of such conservative strategies are usually disappointing. For severe depression electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an option and for atypical depressions monoamine oxide inhibitors (MAO) inhibitors often give relief at this point. A unique strategy with both theoretical and practical implications is lithium augmentation (Fava et al, 1994). Addition of lithium to SSRI failures at 3-4 weeks is consistently and sometimes dramatically found to be helpful. This is considered true even by those authors who advocate use of lithium under usual circumstances only in bipolar patients. Lithium in recent years has been joined as a mood stabilizer by carbamazepine and valproate. Phenytoin, ignored for many years as a possible anticonvulsant mood stabilizer, has been recently reported in double-blind controlled trials to be anti-manic (Mishory et al, 2000) and also prophylactic in BP disorder (Mishory et al, 2003). Data on mood stabilizers other than lithium as augmentors in SSRI failures are sparse. Carbamazepine (Steinacher et al, 2002) and valproate (Barbee et al, 2002) have been used. Given our recent preliminary results of phenytoin's efficacy in unipolar depression (Nemets et al, 2005) and its analogy to lithium as a mood stabilizer, it seems important to study phenytoin as a possible augmentation of SSRI failures. We have published a negative study previously of inositol as an augmentation of SSRI failures, enrolling forty-two patients over two years (Nemets et al, 1999). Antidepressant failures are easier to recruit from referring physicians in our center than are untreated patients, whom clinicians are reluctant to refer for new drug studies given the adequacy of standard treatment in 2/3 of them. Thus we estimate that we could enroll 20 patients per year in such a study. Survey of the literature of Li augmentation suggests that 40 phenytoin vs. 40 placebo should give adequate power to detect a significant phenytoin effect if the phenytoin effect is similar to that of lithium.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4 depression
Started Nov 2003
Shorter than P25 for phase_4 depression
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2003
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 6, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 7, 2005
CompletedNovember 25, 2009
November 1, 2009
1.2 years
September 6, 2005
November 23, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Hamilton Depression Scale
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age: 18-65
- DSM-IV criteria for major depression without psychotic features
- at least 3 weeks of treatment with SSRI at clinically adequate dose with at most mild improvement from onset of SSRI treatment
- Hamilton Depression Scale score of at least 18
You may not qualify if:
- ideations of suicide
- pregnancy
- drug or alcohol abuse
- unstable medical illness
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Beersheva Mental Health Centerlead
- The Rogosin Institutecollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Beersheva Mental Health Center
Beersheva, Israel
Sarah Herzog Memorial Hospital
Jerusalem, Israel
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
RH Belmaker, MD
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 6, 2005
First Posted
September 7, 2005
Study Start
November 1, 2003
Primary Completion
January 1, 2005
Study Completion
January 1, 2005
Last Updated
November 25, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-11