A Research Study to See if a Change in Therapy for HIV Infection Can Improve the Immune Response to Treatment
Randomized Trial of a Switch to a Kaletra + Current Dual Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor (NRTI) Backbone Versus Continuation of the Current Regimen in Patients With Poor Immune Responses to Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) in Patients With Complete Viral Suppression: A Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Our goal is to determine if a change in therapy to one containing Kaletra can improve the immune response in patients who have previously been immune partial responders or non-responders. We also are interested in knowing if this agent improves immune response by affecting cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) + T cell death (apoptosis) or by further inhibiting (preventing) ongoing, low-level, viral replication to levels below detection by current viral load measurements. This will help us understand why immune responses to effective antiretroviral therapy are so different and help determine some possible guidelines for managing patients with poor immune responses. Hypothesis: Patients with poor immune responses to HAART who receive Kaletra in place of their current PI or Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NNRTIs) while continuing their current 2 NRTI backbone will have improved immune response to therapy compared to patients who continue their current regimen.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4 hiv-infections
Started Apr 2004
Longer than P75 for phase_4 hiv-infections
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 5, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 27, 2013
CompletedJune 15, 2022
May 1, 2022
5.2 years
September 1, 2005
October 24, 2012
May 23, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Immune Reconstitution [3 Months]
Immune reconstitution is defined as the absolute CD4+ lymphocyte count after 3 months of therapy. Absolute CD4+ T cell count, our measure of immune recovery, was assessed in the clinical laboratory using fluorescent labeled monoclonal antibodies to the CD4 on lymphocytes. This is the main target cell for HIV infection. The absolute CD4+ T cell count is also the only clinically validated surrogate marker of immune dysfunction in HIV. CD4+ count is also our best predictor of morbidity and mortality outcomes.
3 months
Immune Reconstitution [6 Months]
Immune reconstitution is defined as the absolute CD4+ lymphocyte count after 6 months of therapy. Absolute CD4+ T cell count, our measure of immune recovery, was assessed in the clinical laboratory using fluorescent labeled monoclonal antibodies to the CD4 on lymphocytes. This is the main target cell for HIV infection. The absolute CD4+ T cell count is also the only clinically validated surrogate marker of immune dysfunction in HIV. CD4+ count is also our best predictor of morbidity and mortality outcomes.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Rates of ex Vivo T Cell Apoptosis: CD4+ Memory Cell Population [3 Months]
3 months
Rates of ex Vivo T Cell Apoptosis: CD4+ naïve Cell Population [3 Months]
3 months
Rates of ex Vivo T Cell Apoptosis: CD4+ Memory Cell Population [6 Months]
6 months
Rates of ex Vivo T Cell Apoptosis: CD4+ naïve Cell Population [6 Months]
6 months
Rates of ex Vivo T Cell Apoptosis: CD8+ Cell Population [3 Months]
3 months
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Kaletra + Current Dual NRTI Backbone
EXPERIMENTALPatients in this arm received Kaletra in addition to their current Dual NRTI Backbone.
Current Regimen
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this study arm continued their current regimen.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- HIV Infection documented CD4+ count within the last 30 days (or drawn with screening labs)
- Currently on a stable 3-drug HAART regimen including 2 NRTIs for \> 6 month viral load (VL) \< 50/mm3 for \> 6 months, last within the last 30 days (or drawn with screening labs)
- Partial immune responder or immune non-responder
- Age \> 18 years
- Labs (drawn at screening)
- Alanine transaminase (ALT) \< 5 X the upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Total bili \< 2 X ULN
- Creatinine \< 2.0 mg/dL
You may not qualify if:
- Prior therapy with Kaletra
- Known hypersensitivity to Ritonavir
- Therapy the drugs with potential serious drug interactions: flecainide, propafenone, astemizole, terfenadine, rifampin, dihydroergotamine, ergonovine, ergotamine, methylergonovine, cisapride, pimozide, lovastatin, simvastatin, midazolam, triazolam, and St. John's wart.
- Pregnancy; breast feeding
- Current malignancy requiring CT
- Use of systemic corticosteroids, immunosuppressive, or cytotoxic agents within the last 45 days
- Fever and/or evidence of an active infectious complication
- Currently in another interventional clinical trial
- Receiving Interleukin-2 (IL-2) or any other cytokine or growth factor
- Enrollment in another interventional clinical trial
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Chicagolead
- Abbottcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Illinois at Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60607, United States
Related Publications (1)
Pitrak DL, Estes R, Novak RM, Linnares-Diaz M, Tschampa JM. Beneficial effects of a switch to a Lopinavir/ritonavir-containing regimen for patients with partial or no immune reconstitution with highly active antiretroviral therapy despite complete viral suppression. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2011 Jun;27(6):659-67. doi: 10.1089/aid.2010.0230. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
PMID: 21054216RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. David Pitrak
- Organization
- The University of Chicago Department of Health Studies, Section of Infectious Diseases and Global Health
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Pitrak, MD
University of Chicago
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 1, 2005
First Posted
September 5, 2005
Study Start
April 1, 2004
Primary Completion
June 1, 2009
Study Completion
December 1, 2009
Last Updated
June 15, 2022
Results First Posted
August 27, 2013
Record last verified: 2022-05